Rayman Pirate-Community

Serza5 wrote:< knows Record day doesn't get cleaned up

< says it was hypothetical.

MrBadGuy99 wrote:< should be a mod

< asks if ^ is ready to clean everything up from this record day.

< have nothing to say.

< wants to share this to my lovers, lol.

At least our server is doing fine with the record activity :) But you should really think about switching to AJAX , which would make it faster for everyone by reloading the content instead of the whole pages. I know it's PHPBB, but maybe there's some framework available. Maybe I'll write a Greasemo...

Rsandee wrote:We are going to move to a different internet server... thing.

It's called an Internet Service Provider (ISP).

Hunchman801 wrote:< apologises again for the counters -_-

For every fail, ^ should give everybody a bonus extra.

Rsandee wrote:Joke?

< says no. http://www.healthyyounaturally.com/edu/xylitol.htm

Rsandee wrote:Sugar is way to go.

do ^ want to know what's both healthy and more sweet, and just looks like sugar? Xylitol.

Jewish Candy wrote:< keeps getting ninja'd. Life sucks.

< asks if it is Brazilian Subzero?

Rsandee wrote:< Won't drink vodka, but other... stuff.

< doesn't drink alcohol at all, and < am serious.

- says "never mind"

Matyuv wrote:< needs an air cleaner

< asks how long the smog is staying, because < is too lazy to search right now.

Tenderz wrote:<'s laptop is actually his father's but it's like 9 year's old

< guesses that it's too slow because of the operating system being bloated up.

Nope, unfortunately there isn't. 3D graphics do also require much much more work in this case.

RayFan9876 wrote:Who's Shawn?

Some religious guy with funny and weird tendencies.

Well, I thougt about someone who could expand the description at least. But I think that I should replace the table with templates instead.

Bump. No one has made any edits to the Wiki entry yet...

Jewish Candy wrote:Awesome collection of facepalms.
< knows what open source and packet sniffing means, but thanks anyhoo. Meh, < haz no available proof, so we'll end this in your favour.

< is sorry for overracting, but < is just absolutely intolerant of falsehoods, and < have a bad day.

Unfortunately for you, < HAS done the research. :| < knows certain people who have a managerial role in it. Though that was a year ago, and they may have finished the operation, so < isn't going to deny what you say entirely. :P Do you have any data, documentation and analysis that can prove it? NO...