Off Topic

[spiraldoor]

Then why does he bother to log in?

[PluMGMK]

It's easier to keep up when you're logged in. The unread posts feature doesn't work for guests, you know.

[Cairnie]

Perhaps it's something to do with this lovely jam tart.

http://takadox.deviantart.com/journal/28059285

[PluMGMK]

He put too many asterisks in that swear he censored. I feel sympathy for him anyway.

[Acarr]

He sounds quite depressed. I thought he made up that Fawful account for a laugh. :/
Also I didn't know he had a DA account, huh.

Spiraldoor + people he dislikes = bitchy.

Aww, I thought Spiral liked me. xD

[spiraldoor]

It's easier to keep up when you're logged in. The unread posts feature doesn't work for guests, you know.

I never pay any attention to the unread posts thing and I get by just fine.


Why doesn't FAB just tick the "hide my online status" box? I assume he's too stupid to. He's probably too stupid to find this hidden message, too. The reason I made this post look strange (I skipped two lines) is so that this message will only be found by reasonably intelligent people. If you find it, keep quiet... or FAB may find out that he's able to hide his online status. And we don't want that, do we?

[Xenon]

I find the comments on that DA account to be strangely amusing. I certainly don't remember bullying him, and I can't remember any instances where Stacey or Hunchman did either.

Who said "scuttle back to your sewer", by the way?

[Cairnie]

What I'd like to know is HOW saying "when will you ever learn" is bullying?!!? Sadly my response hasn't been good enough.

[spiraldoor]

I was the one who made the sewer comment. I think it was in this thread.

Edit: No, wait, it was in this one. I recommend that you read the page I just linked to, as well as the subsequent one or two, just to get the full picture of what went on.

If no one can confort me right now then I'm f***ked.

This sentence is pathetic in so many ways. I could name at least three. No, four!

~And Mlii I caught you using my signature tilde paragraph thing on DA. Thought you could get away with it there eh?

[MLII]

Sorry ^^

Also, I kinda feel sorry for him. I was in that position once too yaknow.

[El Dango]

I wouldn't say you were in that position.

[spiraldoor]

Your position was not quite rock-bottom of the forum hierarchy (as his was), and you also made the effort to recover (unlike him).

[MLII]

2 things there:

1. Do you think the effort was good enough...?

2. Sorry to sound dumb, but I don't quite remember what a heirarchy is :p

[Acarr]

Every member of this community has the right to be respected. :0)

[MLII]

Well said Annie.

EDIT: The Annie part was meant solely to wind you up/ XD

[spiraldoor]

Mlii 1: Yes it was fine.
Mlii 2:

A hierarchy (Greek: hierarchia (ἱεραρχία), from hierarches, "leader of sacred rites") is an arrangement of items (objects, names, values, categories, etc.) in which the items are represented as being "above," "below," or "at the same level as" one another and with only one "neighbor" above and below each level. These classifications are made with regard to rank, importance, seniority, power status or authority. A hierarchy of power is called a power structure. Abstractly, a hierarchy is simply an ordered set or an acyclic graph.

A hierarchy can link entities either directly or indirectly, and either vertically or horizontally. The only direct links in a hierarchy, insofar as they are hierarchical, are to one's immediate superior or to one of one's subordinates, although a system that is largely hierarchical can also incorporate other organizational patterns. Indirect hierarchical links can extend "vertically" upwards or downwards via multiple links in the same direction, following a path. All parts of the hierarchy which are not linked vertically to one another nevertheless can be "horizontally" linked through a path by traveling up the hierarchy to find a common direct or indirect superior, and then down again. This is akin to two co-workers or colleagues; each reports to a common superior, but they have the same relative amount of authority.

In short:

moderating team > normal members > FAB
{Mlii} ∈ normal members
{FAB} ∉ normal members

Acarr: No they do not. Respect should be earned. And FAB has earned whatever the opposite of respect is. Disrespect? Yes, that will do.

Mlii again: There's no use in trying to wind her up if you're going to tell her that that's what you're doing in the same post that you're doing it in. It rather undermines the whole thing.

[Acarr]

Acarr: No they do not. Respect should be earned. And FAB has earned whatever the opposite of respect is. Disrespect? Yes, that will do.

Maybe socially, but every member has the right to feel wanted, happy and safe in this environment. If you get my drift.

[MLII]

Thanks Spiral.

Also, I agree with Acarr.

[spiraldoor]

Acarr: No they do not. Respect should be earned. And FAB has earned whatever the opposite of respect is. Disrespect? Yes, that will do.

Maybe socially, but every member has the right to feel wanted, happy and safe in this environment. If you get my drift.

I agree with the "safe" part. Not "happy" or "wanted", though.

[PluMGMK]

Maybe socially, but every member has the right to feel wanted, happy and safe in this environment. If you get my drift.

Isn't that what I said in my mod application?