Rate that signature!

For everything not related to either Rayman or Pirate-Community.
Forum rules
Please keep the forum rules and guidelines in mind when creating or replying to a topic.
technology4617
Antitoon
Posts: 2340
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 6:25 am
Location: Small children.
Tings: 10

Re: Rate that signature!

Post by technology4617 »

new sigz
Master wrote:Hm, yeah, the red of Gallifrey doesn't really work well with the blues of the other locations. Lemme see to that:
Image
10/10 :)
Bradandez
Annetta Fish
Posts: 18589
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 12:50 am
Tings: 137530

Re: Rate that signature!

Post by Bradandez »

5/10 for me. I don't find the text appealing.
technology4617
Antitoon
Posts: 2340
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 6:25 am
Location: Small children.
Tings: 10

Re: Rate that signature!

Post by technology4617 »

Bradandez wrote:5/10 for me. I don't find the text appealing.
:(

It's better than the one I had before, though, and, to be honest, it's just the watermark for some of my YouTube videos. :P
Serza5
Mr Dark
Posts: 48387
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 7:51 pm
Location: MOTHER FUCKING SCOTLAND OH YEAH BABY
Contact:
Tings: 490135

Re: Rate that signature!

Post by Serza5 »

5/10. Eh it's stylish but my main issues with it are :
- Why is the "gaming" text not italic? It doesn't look bad but it does seem kind of silly to do part rather than all or nothing
- Plain black backgrounds are just ugh, I guess some colours don't suit RPCs background but i'm sure you can get away with making yours transparent
- Plain and simple is nice but yours feel that bit too plain

In other words: It's not bad but it doesn't look all that nice either.
Adsolution
Holly Luya
Posts: 22233
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 4:55 pm
Contact:
Tings: 110541

Re: Rate that signature!

Post by Adsolution »

I kind of like the italics then non-italics, but other than that, I agree with what Serza has to say. Mind you, I think it can work, but it actually needs more effects.
technology4617
Antitoon
Posts: 2340
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 6:25 am
Location: Small children.
Tings: 10

Re: Rate that signature!

Post by technology4617 »

Serza5 wrote:5/10. Eh it's stylish but my main issues with it are :
- Why is the "gaming" text not italic? It doesn't look bad but it does seem kind of silly to do part rather than all or nothing
- Plain black backgrounds are just ugh, I guess some colours don't suit RPCs background but i'm sure you can get away with making yours transparent
- Plain and simple is nice but yours feel that bit too plain
In other words: It's not bad but it doesn't look all that nice either.
The "gaming" text is not italicized to make it easier to distinguish the two separate words. I agree that my new signature is not the best thing in the world, but it's more just a temporary-ish solution to provide something better than what I currently had.

To tell the truth, my signature is actually just the watermark I sometimes use for YouTube videos:
Serza5
Mr Dark
Posts: 48387
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 7:51 pm
Location: MOTHER FUCKING SCOTLAND OH YEAH BABY
Contact:
Tings: 490135

Re: Rate that signature!

Post by Serza5 »

I attempted a new sig that's randomized to each of my Pokeman boyfrands. Rates pls? It's still sorta WIP.
Serza5
Mr Dark
Posts: 48387
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 7:51 pm
Location: MOTHER FUCKING SCOTLAND OH YEAH BABY
Contact:
Tings: 490135

Re: Rate that signature!

Post by Serza5 »

May I ask which one you are referring to? I have 3 in the randomizer but it seems to favour Colress from my part.
Adsolution
Holly Luya
Posts: 22233
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 4:55 pm
Contact:
Tings: 110541

Re: Rate that signature!

Post by Adsolution »

Ooh! That's a 9.5/10 from me. I really like the placement and everything, and I think the colour scheme blends in great with RPC. You should have three randomised signatures, each one having a different character selected and displayed on the right.

EDIT:

Sorry, I accidentally deleted my post instead of editing it. This is supposed to be between Serza's two posts.
Serza5
Mr Dark
Posts: 48387
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 7:51 pm
Location: MOTHER FUCKING SCOTLAND OH YEAH BABY
Contact:
Tings: 490135

Re: Rate that signature!

Post by Serza5 »

Hehe Ads messed up.
Adsolution
Holly Luya
Posts: 22233
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 4:55 pm
Contact:
Tings: 110541

Re: Rate that signature!

Post by Adsolution »

Serza5 wrote:May I ask which one you are referring to? I have 3 in the randomizer but it seems to favour Colress from my part.
Oh, you do have them randomised, heheh. It's only displaying Colress then for me as well.
Serza5
Mr Dark
Posts: 48387
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 7:51 pm
Location: MOTHER FUCKING SCOTLAND OH YEAH BABY
Contact:
Tings: 490135

Re: Rate that signature!

Post by Serza5 »

The other two has popped up for me but yeah heavily favours Colress by the sight of it. Colress is my favourite one though as I have issues with the other two.

Sycamore being that i'm not fond of his colours which I could fix. Wallace on the other hand has a much lower quality image than the other two and I have no idea where the original source of his image is.
Adsolution
Holly Luya
Posts: 22233
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 4:55 pm
Contact:
Tings: 110541

Re: Rate that signature!

Post by Adsolution »

Ah, Sycamore just showed up now.

At a glance, I think the blue is almost too saturated in front of the RPC theme, but then only after a second I stopped noticing the clash. I quite like it this way, that's a great blue and I think it should stay as such.
Serza5
Mr Dark
Posts: 48387
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 7:51 pm
Location: MOTHER FUCKING SCOTLAND OH YEAH BABY
Contact:
Tings: 490135

Re: Rate that signature!

Post by Serza5 »

That's exactly my thinking but hm. I guess I could link all of them individually since I do have them on my dropbox:
Colress
Sycamore
Wallace

Right now it's liking Wallace for me.
Adsolution
Holly Luya
Posts: 22233
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 4:55 pm
Contact:
Tings: 110541

Re: Rate that signature!

Post by Adsolution »

Wallace (first time seeing his sig) has the best chemistry with the RPC theme, but against the white background, I like them all equally. I wouldn't worry about it.
Serza5
Mr Dark
Posts: 48387
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 7:51 pm
Location: MOTHER FUCKING SCOTLAND OH YEAH BABY
Contact:
Tings: 490135

Re: Rate that signature!

Post by Serza5 »

Heh thanks a bunch. :) I still feel like I want to do a bit more to it though.
Reese Riverson
Razorbeard
Posts: 40215
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 5:32 pm
Location: R̸̨̧̛̝͎͔̹͉̫̞͚͎͈̫̲̘͕̞͔̼̣͍̞̤̹̫̘̼͚̤̮̟͍̺̯͍̜̹͓̤͖͎͌̀̿͗̍͌̈́̿̿͑̄̀͌̒̅͛̄̾̈͠ͅayman Pirate-Community Lodge
Contact:
Tings: 533722

Re: Rate that signature!

Post by Reese Riverson »

9.5/10. Great work, Serza. :)
Master
Rayman 1
Posts: 53542
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 10:14 am
Location: Somewhere specific, I'd assume.
Tings: 468310

Re: Rate that signature!

Post by Master »

Looking good indeed, like how there's a change in the background colour to reflect their different shades of blue.
Serza5
Mr Dark
Posts: 48387
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 7:51 pm
Location: MOTHER FUCKING SCOTLAND OH YEAH BABY
Contact:
Tings: 490135

Re: Rate that signature!

Post by Serza5 »

Thanks much! :D
Rulez
Knaaren
Posts: 14881
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 4:38 pm
Location: Poland
Contact:
Tings: 5745

Re: Rate that signature!

Post by Rulez »

That's a lovely sig! I like it a lot. At first, when it turns to the middle guy (I'm sorry) I thought it's a bit too light, like Ad did, but that was just because I was too used to the other, not Wallace guy. 11/10
Post Reply