10/10Master wrote:Hm, yeah, the red of Gallifrey doesn't really work well with the blues of the other locations. Lemme see to that:
Rate that signature!
Forum rules
Please keep the forum rules and guidelines in mind when creating or replying to a topic.
Please keep the forum rules and guidelines in mind when creating or replying to a topic.
-
technology4617

- Posts: 2340
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 6:25 am
- Location: Small children.
- Tings: 10
Re: Rate that signature!
new sigz

Re: Rate that signature!
5/10 for me. I don't find the text appealing.
-
technology4617

- Posts: 2340
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 6:25 am
- Location: Small children.
- Tings: 10
Re: Rate that signature!
Bradandez wrote:5/10 for me. I don't find the text appealing.
It's better than the one I had before, though, and, to be honest, it's just the watermark for some of my YouTube videos.
-
Serza5

- Posts: 48387
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 7:51 pm
- Location: MOTHER FUCKING SCOTLAND OH YEAH BABY
- Contact:
- Tings: 490135
Re: Rate that signature!
5/10. Eh it's stylish but my main issues with it are :
- Why is the "gaming" text not italic? It doesn't look bad but it does seem kind of silly to do part rather than all or nothing
- Plain black backgrounds are just ugh, I guess some colours don't suit RPCs background but i'm sure you can get away with making yours transparent
- Plain and simple is nice but yours feel that bit too plain
In other words: It's not bad but it doesn't look all that nice either.
- Why is the "gaming" text not italic? It doesn't look bad but it does seem kind of silly to do part rather than all or nothing
- Plain black backgrounds are just ugh, I guess some colours don't suit RPCs background but i'm sure you can get away with making yours transparent
- Plain and simple is nice but yours feel that bit too plain
In other words: It's not bad but it doesn't look all that nice either.
-
Adsolution

- Posts: 22233
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 4:55 pm
- Contact:
- Tings: 110541
Re: Rate that signature!
I kind of like the italics then non-italics, but other than that, I agree with what Serza has to say. Mind you, I think it can work, but it actually needs more effects.
-
technology4617

- Posts: 2340
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 6:25 am
- Location: Small children.
- Tings: 10
Re: Rate that signature!
The "gaming" text is not italicized to make it easier to distinguish the two separate words. I agree that my new signature is not the best thing in the world, but it's more just a temporary-ish solution to provide something better than what I currently had.Serza5 wrote:5/10. Eh it's stylish but my main issues with it are :
- Why is the "gaming" text not italic? It doesn't look bad but it does seem kind of silly to do part rather than all or nothing
- Plain black backgrounds are just ugh, I guess some colours don't suit RPCs background but i'm sure you can get away with making yours transparent
- Plain and simple is nice but yours feel that bit too plain
In other words: It's not bad but it doesn't look all that nice either.
To tell the truth, my signature is actually just the watermark I sometimes use for YouTube videos:
-
Serza5

- Posts: 48387
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 7:51 pm
- Location: MOTHER FUCKING SCOTLAND OH YEAH BABY
- Contact:
- Tings: 490135
Re: Rate that signature!
I attempted a new sig that's randomized to each of my Pokeman boyfrands. Rates pls? It's still sorta WIP.
-
Serza5

- Posts: 48387
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 7:51 pm
- Location: MOTHER FUCKING SCOTLAND OH YEAH BABY
- Contact:
- Tings: 490135
Re: Rate that signature!
May I ask which one you are referring to? I have 3 in the randomizer but it seems to favour Colress from my part.
-
Adsolution

- Posts: 22233
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 4:55 pm
- Contact:
- Tings: 110541
Re: Rate that signature!
Ooh! That's a 9.5/10 from me. I really like the placement and everything, and I think the colour scheme blends in great with RPC. You should have three randomised signatures, each one having a different character selected and displayed on the right.
EDIT:
Sorry, I accidentally deleted my post instead of editing it. This is supposed to be between Serza's two posts.
EDIT:
Sorry, I accidentally deleted my post instead of editing it. This is supposed to be between Serza's two posts.
-
Serza5

- Posts: 48387
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 7:51 pm
- Location: MOTHER FUCKING SCOTLAND OH YEAH BABY
- Contact:
- Tings: 490135
Re: Rate that signature!
Hehe Ads messed up.
-
Adsolution

- Posts: 22233
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 4:55 pm
- Contact:
- Tings: 110541
Re: Rate that signature!
Oh, you do have them randomised, heheh. It's only displaying Colress then for me as well.Serza5 wrote:May I ask which one you are referring to? I have 3 in the randomizer but it seems to favour Colress from my part.
-
Serza5

- Posts: 48387
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 7:51 pm
- Location: MOTHER FUCKING SCOTLAND OH YEAH BABY
- Contact:
- Tings: 490135
Re: Rate that signature!
The other two has popped up for me but yeah heavily favours Colress by the sight of it. Colress is my favourite one though as I have issues with the other two.
Sycamore being that i'm not fond of his colours which I could fix. Wallace on the other hand has a much lower quality image than the other two and I have no idea where the original source of his image is.
Sycamore being that i'm not fond of his colours which I could fix. Wallace on the other hand has a much lower quality image than the other two and I have no idea where the original source of his image is.
-
Adsolution

- Posts: 22233
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 4:55 pm
- Contact:
- Tings: 110541
Re: Rate that signature!
Ah, Sycamore just showed up now.
At a glance, I think the blue is almost too saturated in front of the RPC theme, but then only after a second I stopped noticing the clash. I quite like it this way, that's a great blue and I think it should stay as such.
At a glance, I think the blue is almost too saturated in front of the RPC theme, but then only after a second I stopped noticing the clash. I quite like it this way, that's a great blue and I think it should stay as such.
-
Adsolution

- Posts: 22233
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 4:55 pm
- Contact:
- Tings: 110541
Re: Rate that signature!
Wallace (first time seeing his sig) has the best chemistry with the RPC theme, but against the white background, I like them all equally. I wouldn't worry about it.
-
Serza5

- Posts: 48387
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 7:51 pm
- Location: MOTHER FUCKING SCOTLAND OH YEAH BABY
- Contact:
- Tings: 490135
Re: Rate that signature!
Heh thanks a bunch.
I still feel like I want to do a bit more to it though.
-
Reese Riverson

- Posts: 40215
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 5:32 pm
- Location: R̸̨̧̛̝͎͔̹͉̫̞͚͎͈̫̲̘͕̞͔̼̣͍̞̤̹̫̘̼͚̤̮̟͍̺̯͍̜̹͓̤͖͎͌̀̿͗̍͌̈́̿̿͑̄̀͌̒̅͛̄̾̈͠ͅayman Pirate-Community Lodge
- Contact:
- Tings: 533722
Re: Rate that signature!
9.5/10. Great work, Serza. 
-
Master

- Posts: 53542
- Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 10:14 am
- Location: Somewhere specific, I'd assume.
- Tings: 468310
Re: Rate that signature!
Looking good indeed, like how there's a change in the background colour to reflect their different shades of blue.
-
Serza5

- Posts: 48387
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 7:51 pm
- Location: MOTHER FUCKING SCOTLAND OH YEAH BABY
- Contact:
- Tings: 490135
Re: Rate that signature!
Thanks much! 
Re: Rate that signature!
That's a lovely sig! I like it a lot. At first, when it turns to the middle guy (I'm sorry) I thought it's a bit too light, like Ad did, but that was just because I was too used to the other, not Wallace guy. 11/10


