Rayman Pirate-Community

MLII wrote:could i very politely remind everyone i use they pronouns, though? X:

Sorry sorry, fixed.

OldClassicGamer wrote:Thanks for being very honest Ad, this is exactly why I have respect for you. I do however have one question. I am more than aware what you mean by content ownership, but I am a bit confused when you mentioned privacy because while I know myself that my views on copyright are not very good by standards of some people, I am really surprised you mentioned privacy since I consider myself to be person who respects others privacy. Please tell me what you mean by that Ad because while I will never change my view on copyright, I want to improve everything else there is, expecially if it is something regarding privacy. I really do not want to violate anyone's privacy

If you recall that trailer discussion, I was arguing that it was an invasion of privacy.

Rulez wrote:Adsolution: easily my best friend overall, anytime, everywhere. Without you, I would have no idea what to do in the future. You're really important in my life, and probably the only person I can be brutally honest and share ALL of my problems with, plus it's like we were created specifically to meet and start a band, wow. I can't believe I've never seen your poop, though. We have to change that. And while we're at it let's fuck already.

Thanks you guy! <3

GOT4N wrote:Adsolution:
I know he's not liking me a lot, but I won't do reverse for that, I think he's doin' a pretty good job with ROTD I'm following since a long time, good member!

Don't worry, I like you now. :>

Master wrote:Ad:
Blimey, you've got quite a track record. While I can't say I always appreciate your approach to some scenarios,

I presume you're referring to the abrasiveness at times?

Also, hue, I noticed I'm the only one on your list who got an abbreviated name.

Sny wrote:Adsolution: I think you meant ditzy and not ditsy? That would make sense because indeed I'm a childish person.. And that's my main problem and reason why I have certain problems in talking with other ones :/

They're alternate spellings of the same word. But I didn't mean childish, rather silly in sort of a good way, if you know what I mean.

Such kind words from everyone. I'll make sure to respond this weekend.

Alright, time for the people that joined in the meantime:

Rayfist: You also evolved as person since you joined RPC. You are a participative member in both Rayman and non-Rayman related discussions. You're a good friend that also likes to talk about gaming and ocasionally play online matches. I only think that sometimes you are a bit impulsive towards some opinions/critiques due to misinterpretations. I think I know who to do a call in case I visit the Eastern United States one day!

GOT4N: Probably one of the biggest contributors in the community for discovering many hidden information in the Rayman games by extracting and modding them. You also make impressive tool-assisted speedruns!

Master: A very nice person and one of the biggest contributors in the Rayman community. Even before you became a moderator (you are doing a fantastic job!), you did countless contributions and it is impressive how much help you give to RPC everyday, knowing that you are also studying in the university. You are also one of the most friendly people I've met in these surroundings. You have my great respect. I would like to meet you personally if one day I was visiting the United Kingdom.

Haruka wrote:I only think that sometimes you are a bit impulsive towards some opinions/critiques due to misinterpretations. I think I know who to do a call in case I visit the Eastern United States one day!

This has happened before due to me missing obvious sarcasm on the internet, luckily I think I've improved upon this lately, thank you Haruka!

Hmm, so whatever happened to this, Roles?

Well, round 1 finished, and it's really too soon to start another round.

Aw, I wanted to make another round!
bring on da drinks on da table

Bleh, I'll just take a cuppa, as always.

It could be fun to do a negative round, where only negative (yet constructive) analyses are allowed!

That'd make for an interesting shake-up, though I wonder if all members would be quite so approving.

You are all free to write anything negative about me if you want to, whatever you write I wouldn't mind as long as it is not personal attack on me but rather constructive criticism.

Aye, I still haven't said mine yet.

The golden rule: Criticism =/= Personal attacks

If you guys would like a 'negative round' then that can totally happen! As long as it does follow the OP rules, and comes under 'constructive criticism' - I've got a feeling that we're a mature enough bunch to be able to cope with this.

Also, if we have 2 rounds (positive & negative) it means we can do one of these more frequently

P.S - This thread hasn't been forgotten by me, I just thought we needed to leave it a while longer till we had another go (not a go as in 'attack' that's for this upcoming round buahahha)

I'd be up for that.

Me too
Would I need to sign up again, or are all the previous members automatically signed up?

Me too because why not? :3

Okay so signups for the NEGATIVE (-) WDYTOTM have started!

(right after my previous post!)

I think people re-signing up for the negative one is necessary because it's a totally different aspect of 'the game'.

This will be very interesting in my case, haha. I sign up once more.

ja signup