Rayman Pirate-Community

I would choose the second option and then move to Europe

I doubt that that would be worth the hassle.

Yeah, that's not enough to track the one who found the money ^^

First post on the new poll I guess. I voted the second option (doesn't deserve it yet). So far, he hasn't quite done much more than let's say, Reagen with the end of the Cold War.

How many people in this forum even live in the U.S.? Anyway, I chose the third option, because I hate Obama.

I'm in Canada right now, but I'm an American citizen.

And I don't hate the guy, but he certainly was over-glorified quite early. They had books about his legacy out before he even MADE a legacy. You have to make a history for yourself, get a full head of gray hair, get a few more wrinkles, and get a few heart problems from your work-related stress before you get a goddamn book about your legacy and earn a freakin' medal for your hard work towards peace.

This needs an 'I don't care' option.

I'm with Dango on this one, if I'm honest I'm still trying not to let politics get to me.

I've never been able to see what it is about Obama that makes him so special. To me, he's just another world leader.

Third option. The whole Obama thing is ridiculously overblown. I would have voted for McCain if I was in a position to do so.

~On a related note, I found an amusing website.

El Dango wrote:This needs an 'I don't care' option.

I agree. I'm not voting.

I voted for the second option. I like Obama. The US desperately needed a non-Republican president, and Obama is definitely a huge step forward from Bush, who was the second biggest clown in the White House ever (Nixon was worse). However, he hasn't done anything to deserve the Nobel Peace Prize yet, and I doubt that he ever will deserve it.

Tobbe wrote:The US desperately needed a non-Republican president,

What makes you say this?

Tobbe wrote:List of fuckups

Hmm, none of these things bother me remotely. And that article is about the Bush administration, not the Republican party.

So the fact that the Republicans don't give a shit about the environment doesn't bother you? Are you one of the few morons who still don't accept that the current climate changes are man-made?

Tobbe wrote:So the fact that the Republicans don't give a shit about the environment doesn't bother you? Are you one of the few morons who still don't accept that the current climate changes are man-made?

I have seen no compelling evidence to suggest that it's any more than a lie or gross exaggeration created as an excuse to raise taxes, really. But feel free to prove me wrong.

El Dango wrote:This needs an 'I don't care' option.

It doesn't. Poll options have to be complementary, and if you don't care, you just don't vote I voted for the second option by the way.

He's held presidency for less than a year - how can this possibly reveal him to be some unparalleled political god? It can't. This whole inauguration process has been horrifically over-inflated. I'm voting for the second option because I like his ideologies, nothing more.

Hunchman801 wrote:

El Dango wrote:This needs an 'I don't care' option.

It doesn't. Poll options have to be complementary, and if you don't care, you just don't vote I voted for the second option by the way.

It could be fun to see how many people don't care though.