Rayman Pirate-Community

Must < repeat the answer that < gave Emshomar?

^ should extend the invitation to all.

< wonders if ^^ has any particular names in mind.

< accidentally went onto viewonline.php (curse my clumsy typing!), which says where everyone is on the forum, and noticed that BadGuy and Candish were listed as reading their PMs. < says not to worry, invisible users are still added to the total.

< had already told Omar to kiss <'s arse over that name suggestion.

PluMGMK wrote:< wonders if ^^ has any particular names in mind.

< accidentally went onto viewonline.php (curse my clumsy typing!), which says where everyone is on the forum, and noticed that BadGuy and Candish were listed as reading their PMs. < says not to worry, invisible users are still added to the total.

Now the whole world knows about our trysts
Welp, into <'s hermit-crab shell < goes...

< still thinks ^ should share ^'s candy with everyone.

Nah, only < gets <'s candy
< just saw this

Shrooblord wrote:

Jewish Candy wrote:< enquires once more, whom?

This person( of undesignated sex) for one:

PluMGMK wrote:*decides to just post what they were going to post before Hoodcom made this revelation*

But of course, we all know sapient mangosteens do not possess gender in the same way humans do.

Whatever Jewish Candy says about < is a complete lie anyway. As Master 1, Master 2, and Master 3.

What does < say about ^?

PluMGMK wrote:< accidentally went onto viewonline.php (curse my clumsy typing!), which says where everyone is on the forum, and noticed that BadGuy and Candish were listed as reading their PMs. < says not to worry, invisible users are still added to the total.

< finds that quite neat. < wonders why anybody cares whether other people know they're reading their PMs or not. Unless it actually displays what's in the PM, it's just like someone would be reading a text at the local pub. It's not like everyone suddenly realises what you're reading.

< having a serious conversation with Master on Skype.

< wonders if ^ is talking with Master, Master or Master. < remembers that ^ needn't tell me since that's all up to Master's discretion.

< hopes it isn't a sad-serious discussion.

Yes, < and Master decided, that ^ must share candy.

< wonders if the Master in question has the authority to make ^^. < knows ^ couldn't possibly, as ^ already has a food-related agreement with ^^ and everyone knows one can only make one active food-related agreement with anyone else.

< guesses < and ^ will find out sooner or later.

^ is confused about whether ^ is in discourse with Master, Master or Master? Has it spread outside the forum, too??

< will have to tender <'s resignation to ^^ if that turned out to be the case.

< hasn't a clue. < just knows of one Master.

^^ is talkative again, < sees! < hopes there can be no mistaking ^^'s identity for that of Master or Master, for ^^'s sake.