Rayman Pirate-Community

Shrooblord wrote:< doesn't think Ambs should pay much attention to that friend's advice, then, if all he does is criticise others hypocritically without any real reason for it.

Well it's odd, it was only today. He's usually quite funny and stuff, but then again he can be odd at times. He always gets in arguments with < and he can be judgemental and sometimes hypocritical. He's a bit strange though, he can be careless and thoughtless and can overreact to a lot of stuff, but I don't think he's a negative norton, particularly not a nasty one.

< is a big fan of Brad's current sig, < remembers it from about a year ago. < can't believe it's been so long.

< has charming nose pains which < tends to get when working "too much"

< likes ^'s new signature (y)

< finds <'s new sig awfully refreshing, especially the aesthetic of <'s last one was wearing off on <
< wouldn't mind going for something like the last one again except <'d want it to be not so plain

< is liking ^’s new sig!

< is bored. < is going to the English lessons in a hour, however.

< basically never misses studying English in school.
< dreamed about Macbeth last night.

That has to be the most weird dream ever, according to <.

Serza5 wrote:< finds <'s new sig awfully refreshing, especially the aesthetic of <'s last one was wearing off on <

Your new one feels very nostalgic to <.

In the end we didn't go to the debate and just had a celebratory meal out instead. < drank one too many caipirinhas, ie. more than one

Jewish Candy wrote:In the end we didn't go to the debate and just had a celebratory meal out instead. < drank one too many caipirinhas, ie. more than
one

Hopefully you didn't drank too much!


What's happening with <'s Chrome? < is using Safari, however.

Hoozang wrote:That has to be the most weird dream ever, according to <.

< didn't even mention the bit about it mixing up Macbeth with Dante's Inferno! Not the first time < has had such "mixing-up" dreams, but probably the first in which only "classical" fiction was involved, for want of a better term.

Jewish Candy wrote:In the end we didn't go to the debate and just had a celebratory meal out instead.

< is glad to hear it!

Hoozang wrote:What's happening with <'s Chrome? < is using Safari, however.

< says the stylesheet didn't load, probably because the connection was interrupted. So it's a problem with the connection, not the browser.

Jewish Candy wrote:

Serza5 wrote:< finds <'s new sig awfully refreshing, especially the aesthetic of <'s last one was wearing off on <

Your new one feels very nostalgic to <.

< is the same, < does like <'s "old school" sigs especially when it gives the feeling of "You still got it"

And ya do Funnily enough < doesn't think < has never attempted that style of sig. Next month, perhaps.

< also likes ^^'s new, good old-fashioned sig!

< is not used to seeing the rough, square edges on ^^^'s signature.

Tbh the background of the sig has the effect of softening its edges quite a bit, at least to <'s eyes.

< can see the softening only by a bit, but still.

Bradandez wrote:< is not used to seeing the rough, square edges on ^^^'s signature.

< was pondering whether or not do the rounded edges and the only reason < didn't go with it was because it looked fine as is

< also feels nostalgic about ^'s sig for some reason. It kind of reminds < of one of <'s own, perhaps made by Matyuv or someone, though < has no idea which one. Could just be the green-ness.