Rayman Pirate-Community

technology4617 wrote:

Adsolution wrote:Great, just as we get over one conflict, another begins. Leave it out of this topic.

Definitely fine by me; I didn't at all expect to get that kind of backlash from someone who I wasn't even addressing.

But you definitely had to reply just one more time, didn't you. (:

Adsolution: my problem is simply that... tell you what, I'll PM you the rest of the post. (it's already finished, just thought I wouldn't clutter the thread up even more)

Truner wrote:But you definitely had to reply just one more time, didn't you. (:

*sigh*

Anyway, I've been having a bit of trouble with the game treating any input I press while loading after a death as something I'm holding right then, and while it is entirely fixable (and hence why I hadn't posted about it until now), it's a bit annoying to have something you do by habit actually act as a danger when you're playing. This is possibly a glitch with the game itself I suppose, but I don't remember this happening with my old DOSBox configuration.

technology4617 wrote:

Truner wrote:But you definitely had to reply just one more time, didn't you. (:

*sigh*

Anyway, I've been having a bit of trouble with the game treating any input I press while loading after a death as something I'm holding right then, and while it is entirely fixable (and hence why I hadn't posted about it until now), it's a bit annoying to have something you do by habit actually act as a danger when you're playing. This is possibly a glitch with the game itself I suppose, but I don't remember this happening with my old DOSBox configuration.

Do you have that old DOSBox config still? It might be worth checking the differences to see what's acting up. Haven't had this issue myself actually, but I also haven't played the game all that much. It'd be nice to get the game 100% working with the next release.

I think you all guys may shut up about Truner and tje disputs, there's no point doing this. Ignore between yourselves

Come on guys, its Christmas

It's joy and gifts we should be giving each other, not bullshit :c

Truner wrote:Do you have that old DOSBox config still? It might be worth checking the differences to see what's acting up. Haven't had this issue myself actually, but I also haven't played the game all that much. It'd be nice to get the game 100% working with the next release.

I have it on my other computer, which I'll have access to in around a week or so.

rayman optimum 1.40 the last version ???

raymandesigner wrote:My New Rayman Designer 24 Maps Created 6 Worlds Level 100% completed
Enjoy Fun Play.
Rayman Designer New 24 Levels walkthrough Video http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL ... Eh-9YZ-_FI_

Download: https://app.box.com/s/hcs8xr8qeddcrxdi7oin

Dude, you should OR create your own topic for this stuff OR post it in the Rayman 1 topic, but this is NOT, I repeat NOT, where your Rayman Designer posts belong. I hope to have informed you sufficiently.

Please create your own topic.
자신의 주제를 만드십시오.

That's enough, Imco and OCG.

Any more hostility or posts against raymandesigner will be faced with ting deductions. We are tired of all these useless bickering over harmless posts. Especially after everything has settled already.

Sorry, Hoodcom :/

Sorry Hood, didn't mean to be hostile :/
Looking at my post I see I might have been a bit harsh, but the intentions were good, I swear

Hoodcom wrote:That's enough, Imco and OCG.

Any more hostility or posts against raymandesigner will be faced with ting deductions. We are tired of all these useless bickering over harmless posts. Especially after everything has settled already.

How was this being hostile? I just asked him to create his own topic for unrelated Rayman Optimum things he makes. Never did I insult him and I even tried to help when he had problem in the past. Truner (who is in charge for Rayman Optimum) already said that he does not wish for this thread being used for non Rayman Optimum downloads and works. Please do not consider this post as going against you Hood, all I am asking is a clarification why does my post clssify as acting hostile towards raymandesigner. Imagine if I was posting links to something that is not related to RoTD thread multiple times. Wouldn't that annoy others who came to a thread to see latest progress on RoTD?

OldClassicGamer wrote:How was this being hostile? I just asked him to create his own topic for unrelated Rayman Optimum things he makes. Never did I insult him and I even tried to help when he had problem in the past. Truner (who is in charge for Rayman Optimum) already said that he does not wish for this thread being used for non Rayman Optimum downloads and works. Please do not consider this post as going against you Hood, all I am asking is a clarification why does my post clssify as acting hostile towards raymandesigner. Imagine if I was posting links to something that is not related to RoTD thread multiple times. Wouldn't that annoy others who came to a thread to see latest progress on RoTD?

You do not understand, OCG. This is a forum without rules, where total chaos is okay and therefore we should NOT expect the staff to do anything for the community as a whole, simple as that. If you disagree, you are considered being hostile, so do not get yourself banned over some korean prick littering shit all over the thread. (:

ting deduction is a scary thing

raymandesigner wrote:rayman optimum 1.40 the last version ???

No, it isn't. We are planning one final update with support for the main OS trio sometime... I guess in 2015? I'd like to see it finished before Summer, but no promises.

Truner wrote:You do not understand, OCG. This is a forum without rules, where total chaos is okay and therefore we should NOT expect the staff to do anything for the community as a whole, simple as that. If you disagree, you are considered being hostile, so do not get yourself banned over some korean prick littering shit all over the thread. (:

Hoodcom was referring to the hostility, specifically coming from you, not whether you think the staff is handling the situation properly.

Truner wrote:ting deduction is a scary thing

A very scary thing indeed, empirically noted by how you keep giving away your tings to OCG because you know it's coming, and you're trying to weasel your way out of it.

Given that you still seem to have no desire to withhold your hostility towards raymandesigner (the only thing being asked of you), here's a 200-ting deduction. Now you have a negative ting count, well done!

Adsolution wrote:Now you have a negative ting count, well done!

Check again.

Adsolution wrote:A very scary thing indeed, empirically noted by how you keep giving away your tings to OCG because you know it's coming, and you're trying to weasel your way out of it.

Given that you still seem to have no desire to withhold your hostility towards raymandesigner (the only thing being asked of you), here's a 200-ting deduction. Now you have a negative ting count, well done!

Actually, I was giving them away because I have no need for them, nor do I care enough to collect them. However, having a negative count is pretty unique, so thanks. (:

Adsolution wrote:Hoodcom was referring to the hostility, specifically coming from you, not whether you think the staff is handling the situation properly.

Actually, Hoodcom mentioned me and Imco in a post and not Truner.

I still wish to know why was my post where I just asked raymandesigner to post links of his creations in different topic without using any inappropriate language considered hostile. Also, how would you feel Ad if I posted random unrelated links on RoTD thread and ignored others when they tell me to stop?

I am not trying to pick a fight with you or Hoodcom, but I just want to have better understanding of this so I do not repeat it in the future.

OldClassicGamer wrote:
Actually, Hoodcom mentioned me and Imco in a post and not Truner.

I still wish to know why was my post where I just asked raymandesigner to post links of his creations in different topic without using any inappropriate language considered hostile. Also, how would you feel Ad if I posted random unrelated links on RoTD thread and ignored others when they tell me to stop?

I am not trying to pick a fight with you or Hoodcom, but I just want to have better understanding of this so I do not repeat it in the future.

I had the sentences separated. I simply said enough to you and Imco in specific.


Then the other was a general warning to everyone.