Page 7 of 10
Re: RayGallery Website - Last updated: December 21, 2006
Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2007 7:21 pm
by Xenon
8 images aren't showing actually. And nice pics, even though 95% were found on Matthias's website

Re: RayGallery Website - Last updated: December 21, 2006
Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2007 7:22 pm
by Beebop
Matthias provides me with all my Rayman needs.

Re: RayGallery Website - Last updated: December 21, 2006
Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2007 10:35 pm
by Beebop
Re: RayGallery Website - Last updated: December 21, 2006
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 10:40 am
by Xenon
Some of those need linking, they're stretching the page!
Re: RayGallery Website - Last updated: December 21, 2006
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 11:29 am
by Newray
And that was another set of overused Rayman images.

Re: RayGallery Website - Last updated: December 21, 2006
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 12:10 pm
by Beebop
I can find many more.
Re: RayGallery Website - Last updated: December 21, 2006
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 5:21 pm
by Reese Riverson
Xenon09 wrote:Some of those need linking, they're stretching the page!
Umm... they are not stretching the page... they fit just fine from what I see.

Re: RayGallery Website - Last updated: December 21, 2006
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 6:45 pm
by Newray
Depends on how high your resolution is.
Re: RayGallery Website - Last updated: December 21, 2006
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 6:49 pm
by Reese Riverson
They would stretch the page for sure when Hunchman sets a style that was like the old one.
I'm using a 1280 x 1024 resolution.. so that may be why. What are you using?
Re: RayGallery Website - Last updated: December 21, 2006
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 7:08 pm
by Kelvin12
I use the same.
Oh and, I have a picture I will submit:
It may not be rare, but it hasn't been used before.

Re: RayGallery Website - Last updated: December 21, 2006
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 7:24 pm
by Xenon
This one doesn't stretch in a 1280 by 1024 resolution?
storage/3795/9bb705964f33aed722ccf74991d769af
Anyway, I use 800 by 600. ^^
Re: RayGallery Website - Last updated: December 21, 2006
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 7:26 pm
by Kelvin12
Well, you see, the pictures are pushed back causing it not to strech the page.
Re: RayGallery Website - Last updated: December 21, 2006
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 7:27 pm
by Xenon
Yes, I understand. I've never used 1280 by 1024.
Re: RayGallery Website - Last updated: December 21, 2006
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 7:49 pm
by Reese Riverson
I would sugguest you use at least 1024 x 768. ^^;
Though that would explain why you see the page stretch. So here is what we should have set...
1.) Do not poast images with a width over 500 pixels.
There are those (Like Xenon and Ryo) who uses lower resolutions. We must keep a good clean view for them too.
I know the whole forum fits the resolution on any computer right now...
Re: RayGallery Website - Last updated: December 21, 2006
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 8:01 pm
by Newray
It looks like phpBB3 has found a cure for image stretching, it will automaticly remove the image content that's over the limit entered in the admin panel, the same for sigs. Well that's what I call user friendly.
Re: RayGallery Website - Last updated: December 21, 2006
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 12:10 pm
by Beebop
It should allow full images to be shown.
Re: RayGallery Website - Last updated: December 21, 2006
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 7:14 pm
by Jman
I like it how it is now.
Re: RayGallery Website - Last updated: December 21, 2006
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 3:51 am
by Reese Riverson
anyways. o_o
Any one have any more R1 - 3 images for RayGallery?

Re: RayGallery Website - Last updated: December 21, 2006
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 10:46 am
by Beebop
Jman wrote:I like it how it is now.
But it sucks when you can't put whole images in posts.
Re: RayGallery Website - Last updated: December 21, 2006
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 5:53 pm
by Kelvin12
Hoodcom wrote:anyways. o_o
Any one have any more R1 - 3 images for RayGallery?

I'll upload mine soon.