Rayman Pirate-Community

3D is irritating. I rarely ever use the 3D slide on my 3DS, even if I can handle with for a full hour or so.

When it comes to 3DS 3D, I never use it. It irritates me after five minutes, and my left eye is offset so I need to hold it a foot and a half away for it to even work.

Master4lyf1 wrote:I was asking for that, wasn't I?
In honesty though, that's what I think of 3D, some might enjoy it, but I just can't, it physically sickens me.

I don’t like it when people attack things they can’t have. 3D doesn’t entirely work for me either, but I let the people with superior eyesight have their fun.

RayFan9876 wrote: We're talking about stereoscopic 3D, not CGI.

[/list]

Oops, I didn't have time to read well the posts (as you might understand the consequences of a Record Day).

When I have the opportunity to see a 3D movie I watch. I watched Avatar in the cinema with 3D glasses, same thing for UP.

In my 3DS I always play with the 3D view activated.

Haruka wrote:

RayFan9876 wrote: We're talking about stereoscopic 3D, not CGI.

[/list]

Oops, I didn't have time to read well the posts (as you might understand the consequences of a Record Day).

When I have the opportunity to see a 3D movie I watch. I watched Avatar in the cinema with 3D glasses, same thing for UP.

What happens Haruka?

Rayman502 wrote:

Haruka wrote:

RayFan9876 wrote: We're talking about stereoscopic 3D, not CGI.

[/list]

Oops, I didn't have time to read well the posts (as you might understand the consequences of a Record Day).

When I have the opportunity to see a 3D movie I watch. I watched Avatar in the cinema with 3D glasses, same thing for UP.

What happens Haruka?

You see stuff in"3D" apparently

Its pretty cool (at least for me) since it adds more visual impact. For example in Avatar, it was cool the last moments of the movie with the war between humans and the Na'Vi: some explosions were so realistic that it even looked like there were pieces of destruction projecting against the spectators in the whole cinema room.

Remember this is a forum about "Future Rayman games"

skellydude7 wrote:Remember this is a forum about "Future Rayman games"

There's only so much conversation that can be made before we start to go off topic, if you were to read the official topics for each game you'd notice that going off-topic is rather common.

Not to mention that the staff is here to see who is going too off-topic for real.

I would find interesting if Ubisoft planned later a RPG Rayman game with a similar gameplay system of Paper Mario.

After Legends I want to see a return to 3D, preferably a game like rayman 2. I think they should tone down abit on the wacky aspect,sometimes i question if rayman and his chums were possessed by rabbids these days Also the return of both Ly and Clark would make me very happy indeed.

Haruka wrote:I would find interesting if Ubisoft planned later a RPG Rayman game with a similar gameplay system of Paper Mario.

I wonder if this'd work at all, or if it'd fail miserably. I'm not sure if the Rayman universe is suited for a big talks, like RPGs (usually) require.

RPGs usually require far more intricate stories, I'm not sure how the Rayman series would approach this.

I dont agree with the RPG idea. In my opinion its too complicated for Rayman. For me the way the future Rayman games should be like is open action adventures with many elements, like Rayman Revolution and Beyond Good & Evil.

Rayman is about jumping around and collecting sparkly stuff while looking at cool backgrounds and listening to weird music. That is almost the entire attraction of the series. An RPG is a bad idea; even Revolution was more complicated than it should have been.

spiraldoor wrote:Rayman is about jumping around and collecting sparkly stuff while looking at cool backgrounds and listening to weird music. That is almost the entire attraction of the series. An RPG is a bad idea; even Revolution was more complicated than it should have been.

That was basically the same case for Mario but they managed to pump out a few awesome RPGS based round his world, Raymans universe would suit the RPG genre much better than Marios actually. Still im unsure about the concept, would be weird giving rayman more than 2 lines of dialogue in a game

I also hope that they will keep changing action in Rayman games. For me one of the main attraction in the series is that the action in Rayman games dont repeat itself but changes. Not just running and jumping but also flying, swimming, receiving help from friends like Globox, Sssssam, Carmen etc., riding vehicles like the warship, armaguiddon, Kaags legs and much more.

I see your points, you guys are right now that I'm thinking better: it would indeed require a lot of talking and it would require a big variety of fauna in the Glade of Dreams (much minor to a Mario game for example). The only single player RPGs that I enjoy are Mario ones, so I agree. It was a stupid idea of mine, it wouldn't really work at all. Afterall Rayman is much more recognized by the platforming department than in the other games (lets not count the minigames of the Rabbids, ok?) I admit I only thought in this at first because of Rayman's team in RO and their adventures together and the possibility of co-operating in attacks. I didn't really think in the rest (boy I must be tired today ).

When if first put this on Rayman PC I thought i would get about 3 reply's!

Oh and Also they should make a Rayman Collection! (They've been making a lot of those)

spiraldoor wrote:Rayman is about jumping around and collecting sparkly stuff while looking at cool backgrounds and listening to weird music. That is almost the entire attraction of the series. An RPG is a bad idea; even Revolution was more complicated than it should have been.

Yes, thank you! I've never been able to understand why some people are so desperate for a Rayman RPG in the first place. To me it makes about as much sense as wanting a bowling game based on Need for Speed.

Bzzit wrote: That was basically the same case for Mario but they managed to pump out a few awesome RPGS based round his world, Raymans universe would suit the RPG genre much better than Marios actually. Still im unsure about the concept, would be weird giving rayman more than 2 lines of dialogue in a game

Mario is so insanely popular that you can build almost any sort of game around the franchise and still expect it to sell. This isn't at all the case with Rayman, so suddenly going off into strange new directions like that is probably going to end in failure.