Now try creating a Portable ID with the European PSN site.CHRdutch wrote:< thinks the new portable IDs look like sh*t
The image isn’t displaying correctly for me. Try embedding this in your sig:CHRdutch wrote:< says that looks alot better
Code: Select all
https://raymanpc.com/forum/storage/23352/9eeaa0fdd90caa185cc5d1cb30eb143f< thinks the portable IDs look nice, especially the EU ones.Imco wrote:< thinks those portable IDs look like shit either way
New?CHRdutch wrote:< thinks the new portable IDs look like sh*t
< didn't know the eu ones and the us one were differentOldClassicGamer wrote:New?CHRdutch wrote:< thinks the new portable IDs look like sh*t
< has the one styled like that for years.
Fifo wrote:< doesn’t have any ideas.Imco wrote:Well currently it's a forum about nothing, right?
Maybe ^ should give it a theme.
< means, forums tend to be the place where people with similar interests get in touch, but since ^'s forum doesn't really revolve around one particular theme or interest, it's not as appetizing for people to actual make an account and log in.
< doesn’t see any issues with the layout.Imco wrote:Also, ^ should do something about the current lay-out
BUt < can’t get any ideas for a theme for <’s forum. Also, < doesn’t see any issues with the layout.Imco wrote:< saw it, but < doesn't really have a response to that, since there's literally nothing more to say.
Actually, < asked Harpic for an explanation a while back and his answer was (and < quotes) : "cacaprout". But yeah, < is the one who's not willing to discuss.Canard WC wrote:Without question? You're the one who's not willing to discuss, not me. Your fate is sealed anyway.Pirez wrote:Also, thank you for making < right.Pirez wrote:So, there you go : the Jlfksjlfl felt insulted and < should comply without question. < feels insulted and nobody cares. I feel disrespected by the majority of you and, should the hacking occur, < will leave the RPC. It's as simple as that.
Now, let's analyse.Harpic fraîcheur wrote:Pirez,Pirez wrote:Unless somebody clearly explains to me the joke (and even then...) you can all screw yourselves.
Sincerely.
It is not a joke. The angered the Great Flying Poo, which is an unacceptable affront for our religion.
Canard WC is our prophet, I'm a member of the Jlfksjlfl club. You made a mockery of both of us...
Thanks in advance for the 250 Tings transaction towards our prophet Canard WC or King Comment ?.
If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask.
Harpic fraîcheur wrote:It is not a joke.
< is sure that < is gonna get flak for that, but since I'm already down : you aren't an actually registered religion, thus is a joke. I know it won't be a joke when < is going to get hacked, but it seems inevitable anyway.Harpic fraîcheur wrote:our religion.
Since he is the face of your religion, shouldn't prophet come with a capital P? You don't seem to put much faith in him, especially when you refer to King Comment ? with a capital K.Harpic fraîcheur wrote:Canard WC is our prophet
That's the point of debate between both side. You claim < insulted you, < claim < didn't. For academic purposes (again), I found the bits of commentsHarpic fraîcheur wrote:You made a mockery of both of us...
That was a legitimate question since it was the very first time < had ever heard of Canard WC.Pirez wrote:Wait, you mean that Canard WC and Harpic Fraîcheur are NOT the same guy?
So yeah, < confused the two, and as a result, made a cynical quip (at worst). Hardly an insult. But you seem to disagree. And since we're on the subject, I guess insulting you is fair game when you have administrator powers, case and point :Pirez wrote:Forgive me for mixing up two gels that are used to clean toilets. I do that every day.
Let us continue the analysis :[b][color=#FF0000]DesLife[/color][/b] wrote:Probably because you have a wonderful and strong personality, not at all because you'd suck Canard's dick just to get a pat on your head.Harpic fraîcheur wrote:< is 100% with Canard WC.
You still didn't explain squat, and now <'s discussed my share of the story even though < feels < didn't need to (because come on). But the ransom still applies because doubles standards, < guesses.Harpic fraîcheur wrote:Thanks in advance for the 250 Tings transaction towards our prophet Canard WC or King Comment ?.
If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask.
< send you a PM but you even replied to it. But you were reading this PM ...Pirez wrote:Actually, < asked Harpic for an explanation a while back and his answer was (and < quotes) : "cacaprout". But yeah, < is the one who's not willing to discuss.
< is sad to see that some people still think they can freely insult others and walk away with it.Pirez wrote:Actually, < asked Harpic for an explanation a while back and his answer was (and < quotes) : "cacaprout". But yeah, < is the one who's not willing to discuss.