Rayman Pirate-Community

Ambidextroid wrote:Meh, < got back from the movie and it was pretty rubbish actually, it looked great but didn't make any sense. Most of the time the music didn't fit too.

Haha, well < thinks the exact opposite of this movie haha. Opinions can differ < susupposes.

< thinks that ^ may end up being pleased with some of the improvements to come on <'s server.

< Is going to have fish and chips for dinner

< thought Tomorrowland was pretty flawed, but surprisingly < actually did like the sort of unexpected twist on Tomorrowland itself.
< just finished the most successful game of Mario Party < ever played. It was pretty much an instant win from the third turn. < finds Amiibo Party much more enjoyable than the rubbish car modes, but it does leave < wishing < was playing one of the older games instead,

< was expecting Tomorrowland to be a bunch of fluffy, censored Disney cheese, and while there was some of that, < was pleasantly surprised with how seriously it took itself. < thought one of the biggest issues was the soundtrack, which, typical of live-action Disney, is too focused on trying to achieve magnitude-eleven whimsy. Overall, < liked it a lot, as < can easily correct its flaws in <'s head.

Imco wrote:Haha, well < thinks the exact opposite of this movie haha. Opinions can differ < susupposes.

Yeah I guess so, < thinks there's probably a lot < missed but < couldn't make any sense of it at all, < couldn't really pick up on any discernible plot either.

< watched Big Hero 6 just a couple of hours ago though and really liked it, < expected most of it to just be "random supervillain wants to destroy earth because who cares and random boy gets mutated by toxic waste and gets super powers somehow insert comedy here blah blah blah" but it actually did make sense (for the most part) and was just generally really good.

It's surprising actually because < normally loves sci-fi movies like Tomorrowland and < doesn't like superhero movies…

Thebananacrafter! wrote:< Is going to have fish and chips for dinner

< is jealous

Ambidextroid wrote:< watched Big Hero 6 just a couple of hours ago though and really liked it, < expected most of it to just be "random supervillain wants to destroy earth because who cares and random boy gets mutated by toxic waste and gets super powers somehow insert comedy here blah blah blah" but it actually did make sense (for the most part) and was just generally really good.

What did ^ think of the beginning versus the superhero portion? < loved the beginning, but < thought the superhero portion for the most part was really bland, especially when you compare it to the kinds of things the Marvel movies have been doing recently. It was just so... unoriginal.

< will play Rayman Legends (Wii U version)

< is tired.

< í̳̇s̎ͫ͛ ̋͑ͣg̞ͅla̦d̺ < is̨̜͚ w̘̥r҉͕i͖t̀̕͢t͏͆ing͍͞ ̈w͛ͫį̺͡t̟ͨ͏h c̢ͩor̪̈́͛rǔ̹͢p̛̎͝teͦ͑ḓͮ͂ ̳t͐͐eͥx̢͙͗t̡̳

Adsolution wrote:What did ^ think of the beginning versus the superhero portion? < loved the beginning, but < thought the superhero portion for the most part was really bland, especially when you compare it to the kinds of things the Marvel movies have been doing recently. It was just so... unoriginal.

< can't really speak from experience as < hasn't seen many superhero films (probably about 4 or 5) but < did think it was pretty cheesy.
[spoiler: < thought the twist of who the villain was was pretty good though, as < thought it would just be Krei all along, then when it was Callaghan < thought Krei would turn out to be innocent, but it turns out they were both pretty bad.] It's nice that they kind of thought about giving the villain a real motive instead of just wanting power or money etc. or whatever else Disney usually do (or used to from what < can remember).
< did prefer the beginning portion too and would have liked to see a bit more, but < still found the whole thing enjoyable.

< Is feeling like < might want to 're-brand' <'s self when it comes to this forum < feels that 'rolesfamily' isn't really a true reflection of <. When 'rolesfamily' was becoming infamous on the Rayman Zone he (aka me, aka <) was a very young kid and quite possibly the biggest noob on the planet. Even though some of you might disagree (haha) < is not like that these days.

< thinks you should embrace your noobiness and look at your name with pride, looking back at how you lived through such days.
< is biased with these kinds of things though because < generally disapproves when people change their handles, just because it becomes confusing. < was really confused when Sugar changed his handle, < didn't even know it was him at first...

< Is only thinking of perhaps changing the name to 'Roles' as most people refer to < as 'roles' anyhow

A bit like how < changed from Master4lyf1 to Master, < guesses.

< Wonders what people think about <'s idea

Oh, < approves if it's just shortening it or whatever, as long as it's not changed completely (which makes it very confusing).
< was considering changing <'s general handle to Ambi but, even though < likes it, it's not that original.

< Personally thinks ^'s username is fine as it is but that's just <'s opinion
< Needs to think about it a bit more, but tbh < sees it as a welcomed change
< Feels like < is living in <'s own shadow of a nooby past self

< quite likes 'Roles' as a username, < likes usernames that are single words or are apparently meaningless because they could feasibly be names. By the way, what does the 'family' bit mean?

< Came up with <'s username because at the time < had ambitions of becoming super rich and owning multiple Rolls' Royces and thus they'd be a 'Rolls family' but since < was pretty retarded back in the day < didn't bother to look up the spelling of 'Rolls Royce' and ended up with Roles Royce <'s username should have been rollsfamily but the bad spelling stuck (as with all of my posts too LOL)

< sadly didn't achieve the dream of being super rich hahahaha