Re: Ranks
Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:10 pm
I'm nit putting mine in. Cause I find it to be an unimportant factor in this community.
Yes. I like idea of "watching members", but there should be at least three competing groups with 3 members in each.Xenon09 wrote:Well, I'd say 75% of members would choose not to, either because the score is so high or because they don't approve of pr0oO.
It's not useless. Someone is proud of her/his 500-boon-points and want to make everybody knowing about it, someone thinks her/his 40-boon-points score is too small. So, if somebody REALLY wants to know, (s)he goes to topic. Otherwise, (s)he doesn't read it at all...Matyuv wrote:That's useless because if you want you can see the scores in the boon-o-metre topic anyway
Could you elaborate? To me that made no sense at all.stan423321 wrote:Yes. I like idea of "watching members", but there should be at least three competing groups with 3 members in each.
No offence here, but that wasn't well thought through. Every member who has 100 or more boonpoints hates pr0oO, so your first point is dead. Secondly, people who do want to present their boonscore can have it in their signature. But with all this pr0oO talk going on now it seems peoples' boonscores are common knowledge...It's not useless. Someone is proud of her/his 500-boon-points and want to make everybody knowing about it, someone thinks her/his 40-boon-points score is too small. So, if somebody REALLY wants to know, (s)he goes to topic. Otherwise, (s)he doesn't read it at all...
yes it isstan423321 wrote:It's not useless.
There already is a pr0oO group that creates "boon reports". There should be also a, for example, h0oOme group that would create example "impressivimeter" and a third group, example xSixtyF0oOur, that would create RISC-o-score.Xenon09 wrote:Could you elaborate? To me that made no sense at all.
That would blast boon-o-meter again and I would have 515 boon points, right? Wouldn't I be most boon person on this forum? Let's celebrate!Matyuv wrote:yes it isstan423321 wrote:It's not useless.
agree with me or get a penalty of 15 boonpoints
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I really don't think that would be a good idea. It would seem PC is already being half-run by the boon-o-metre, despite how people are tired of it, we couldn't cope with another. It would start yet more flames. This is another reason why boonscores shouldn't be added to public profile - because it would almost base PC on pr0oO. There's already hatred between the two.There already is a pr0oO group that creates "boon reports". There should be also a, for example, h0oOme group that would create example "impressivimeter" and a third group, example xSixtyF0oOur, that would create RISC-o-score.
what? you haven't been rated yet, what makes you think you have 500 already?stan423321 wrote:That would blast boon-o-meter again and I would have 515 boon points, right? Wouldn't I be most boon person on this forum? Let's celebrate!Matyuv wrote:yes it isstan423321 wrote:It's not useless.
agree with me or get a penalty of 15 boonpoints
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
wtfomgstan423321 wrote:I have to agree that pr0oO group is a bit too serious.
Oops, mistake. I meant 1015.Matyuv wrote:what? you haven't been rated yet, what makes you think you have 500 already?stan423321 wrote:That would blast boon-o-meter again and I would have 515 boon points, right? Wouldn't I be most boon person on this forum? Let's celebrate!Matyuv wrote:yes it isstan423321 wrote:It's not useless.
agree with me or get a penalty of 15 boonpoints
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
and spiraldoor has 550, so no.
roflorlfolrolfoomgomgololloollollolololol!!!!!!!11stan423321 wrote:Got your point. I have to agree that pr0oO group is a bit too serious.
I like Matyuv. He's pretty cool, and is actually funny at times where it's like.Tobbe7 wrote:The pr0oO group and The Boon-O-Metre are officially supported by hunchman.
You just don't care because you don't like me and matyuv, and obvsly cos u got 100/100.
I thank legendary boon stops on 500, and it stops on 1000. In other words, I meant x+15, o.k.?Matyuv wrote:no you didn't, stop making up random crap please