Page 653 of 1084

Re: Ranks

Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 4:00 pm
by neo
Depends on what people like. Who cares, its their money.

Re: Ranks

Posted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 3:14 pm
by stan423321
Hunchman801 wrote:Depends on your point of view, maybe they find it useful and funny :winkgrin:
30 new cars in collection. Never used. ONly ones in series. Do you find it funny? Or useful?

Collecting art or already existing things is another thing, though...

Re: Ranks

Posted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 9:31 pm
by Hunchman801
stan423321 wrote:30 new cars in collection. Never used. ONly ones in series. Do you find it funny? Or useful?
That is not the question :|

Re: Ranks

Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 2:48 pm
by Jman
I didn't even understand it...

Re: Ranks

Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 3:21 pm
by stan423321
Jman wrote:I didn't even understand it...
Oh ****! So, a human bought 30 new cars at the factory. And, none of them has got a identical "twin" somewhere in the world. Volvo S40 is simply one of a thousands of Volvoes S40. And cars of human are only ones in series! Got it?

Re: Ranks

Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 4:07 pm
by Jman
But how do you know that they don't have a twin car.

Re: Ranks

Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 4:09 pm
by stan423321
Cause human paid for having the only one.

Re: Ranks

Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 8:37 pm
by neo
stan423321 wrote:
Jman wrote:I didn't even understand it...
Oh ****! So, a human bought 30 new cars at the factory. And, none of them has got a identical "twin" somewhere in the world. Volvo S40 is simply one of a thousands of Volvoes S40. And cars of human are only ones in series! Got it?
There is no need for censoring here. :mrgreen:

Re: Ranks

Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 2:34 am
by Jman
Yeah, if this was RZ then they would call your post into question.

Re: Ranks

Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 4:54 pm
by neo
Into question? Wow. :pfff:

Re: Ranks

Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 4:59 pm
by stan423321
You mean, they would think it is childish or what?

Re: Ranks

Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:06 pm
by neo
No, children go there, so that would not be the case. :fou2:

Re: Ranks

Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:05 pm
by Xenon
Nobody questioned me when I bypassed the system because no admin or moderator dares to post in the scores topic :mrgreen:

Re: Ranks

Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:20 am
by Jman
neo wrote:Into question? Wow. :pfff:
Yeah, I typed the word "Fuck" about a year ago, and before it would show in the topic, it said that my message was being read by the admin.

Re: Ranks

Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 5:47 am
by Limely
That happened to me once too. :/

Re: Ranks

Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:35 pm
by Jman
I did it twice, and nothing really happened to me.

Re: Ranks

Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 3:43 pm
by Tobbe
I didn't do anything, and I was banned for 'disruptive behaviour' :roll:

Re: Ranks

Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:11 pm
by stan423321
I tried to register as baddie, and server didn't make way for me...

Re: Ranks

Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 3:23 pm
by Hunchman801
The Lums Quest is dead since 2004, if that's what you're referring to.

Re: Ranks

Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 6:45 pm
by stan423321
Yes, but it was 2002 or 2001 then.