Page 695 of 2413
Re: Off Topic
Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2011 8:03 pm
by ikke471
Rulez wrote:Guys
Me and Bart/Trololo and Fat_Mario are making a webcomic about games
Cliché but nice
And here's a first version
http://gamingbunch.thecomicseries.com/
It's totally not finished obviously; Bart is coloring it now and he's doing a beautiful job as an inker, colorer etc.
XD goomba run!!!!
Re: Off Topic
Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2011 8:23 pm
by Rayman3DS
Rulez wrote:Guys
Me and Bart/Trololo and Fat_Mario are making a webcomic about games
Cliché but nice
And here's a first version
http://gamingbunch.thecomicseries.com/
It's totally not finished obviously; Bart is coloring it now and he's doing a beautiful job as an inker, colorer etc.
That's awesome1!!
Re: Off Topic
Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2011 8:25 pm
by Rulez
Rayman3DS wrote:Rulez wrote:Guys
Me and Bart/Trololo and Fat_Mario are making a webcomic about games
Cliché but nice
And here's a first version
http://gamingbunch.thecomicseries.com/
It's totally not finished obviously; Bart is coloring it now and he's doing a beautiful job as an inker, colorer etc.
That's awesome1!!
Thanks.
It still is ugly but when Bart's done with coloring, it will really look pretty; trust me, he's good at such things
And I'm the artist who does sketches and scans them.
Re: Off Topic
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 1:06 pm
by spiraldoor
Puruun wrote:spiraldoor wrote:Puruun wrote:This is why I don't want Spiral to be a mod.
Because I said something that made sense?
No, because of the arguments you get involved in.
Are you saying that moderators should not get involved in arguments?
Re: Off Topic
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 1:40 pm
by Louvis
spiraldoor wrote:Puruun wrote:spiraldoor wrote:Puruun wrote:This is why I don't want Spiral to be a mod.
Because I said something that made sense?
No, because of the arguments you get involved in.
Are you saying that moderators should not get involved in arguments?
Sorry spiral, but that's... ugh.
Absolutely no, moderators should not argue with users. They should be more like... peacemakers. Of course, that doesn't mean that moderators cannot have their own opinions about something, or fool around with other users, but... there are limits (known also as forum regulations, for example, or rules, however you call it), Palmitodamnit.
Re: Off Topic
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 2:01 pm
by spiraldoor
Louvis wrote: Sorry spiral, but that's... ugh.
Absolutely no, moderators should not argue with users. They should be more like... peacemakers. Of course, that doesn't mean that moderators cannot have their own opinions about something, or fool around with other users, but... there are limits (known also as forum regulations, for example, or rules, however you call it), Palmitodamnit.
Tobbe argued with several members in the religion thread yesterday. Are you saying that he should not be allowed to disagree? Or that he should be demoted?
Could someone please explain exactly where I ‘crossed the line’ and my posts in this thread became unforgivably argumentative? I would also like to know why I am personally being targeted while Rayfan, another candidate who participated in the ‘argument’, is being ignored.
Re: Off Topic
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 2:20 pm
by iambored2006
I have no problem with your posts. Argue all you want. I also have no problem with mods arguing. There's something about you being a mod that makes me uneasy. Don't get me wrong, it's nothing against you. I just don't think you're a moderator kind of guy.
Re: Off Topic
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 2:29 pm
by spiraldoor
So I give you a vague sense of foreboding? Excellent.
Re: Off Topic
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 3:23 pm
by iambored2006
spiraldoor wrote:So I give you a vague sense of foreboding? Excellent.
What?! No! I just don't see you as a moderator, just like I don't see Steven Spielberg as an FBI agent.
Re: Off Topic
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 4:53 pm
by Hunchman801
iambored2006 wrote:Also, the judges weren't really fare.
Maybe they were actually.
Re: Off Topic
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 4:58 pm
by spiraldoor
iambored2006 wrote:spiraldoor wrote:So I give you a vague sense of foreboding? Excellent.
What?! No! I just don't see you as a moderator, just like I don't see Steven Spielberg as an FBI agent.
It is difficult to refute such abstract criticism.
Re: Off Topic
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 5:19 pm
by stan423321
Still saying he doesn't see you as a moderator as he doesn't see me as a moderator would be grrreat offense.
Re: Off Topic
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 5:21 pm
by spiraldoor
stan423321 wrote:Still saying he doesn't see you as a moderator as he doesn't see me as a moderator would be grrreat offense.
Right you are, Stan. Right you are.
Re: Off Topic
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 5:37 pm
by iambored2006
Hunchman801 wrote:iambored2006 wrote:Also, the judges weren't really fare.
Maybe they were actually.
I said that? oops! I was seriously distracted at the moment. I also have a serious case of dysgraphia. I can sometimes forget whole words!
What do you mean, Stan?
Re: Off Topic
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 5:44 pm
by spiraldoor
iambored2006 wrote:What do you mean, Stan?
Your guess is as good as mine.
Re: Off Topic
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 5:48 pm
by stan423321
stan423321, a member of Rayman Pirate-Community born in 1994 who joined RPC in 2008 is responsible for roughly 0.8% of posts of RPC during his activity periods (which seem to be quite random, as his activity reportedly depends on real-life events). Stan, known for confusing grammar, a very low amount of English vocabulary, and love for potentially senseless posts, is discussably a non-wothy member of RPC; however a few of his statements regarded as examples were ultimately proven to be true, and so is tolerated by majority of English members, especially as he doesn't seem to try to take control of RPC.
Re: Off Topic
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 5:55 pm
by Rulez
stan423321 wrote:stan423321, a member of Rayman Pirate-Community born in 1994 who joined RPC in 2008 is responsible for roughly 0.8% of posts of RPC during his activity periods (which seem to be quite random, as his activity reportedly depends on real-life events). Stan, known for confusing grammar, a very low amount of English vocabulary, and love for potentially senseless posts, is discussably a non-wothy member of RPC; however a few of his statements regarded as examples were ultimately proven to be true, and so is tolerated by majority of English members, especially as he doesn't seem to try to take control of RPC.
Am I wothy then? Wothy? Wothy? Wooothyyy?
Re: Off Topic
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 5:57 pm
by spiraldoor
You see? Stan is tolerated only because he doesn’t try to take over the site.
Re: Off Topic
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 6:02 pm
by iambored2006
stan423321 wrote:stan423321, a member of Rayman Pirate-Community born in 1994 who joined RPC in 2008 is responsible for roughly 0.8% of posts of RPC during his activity periods (which seem to be quite random, as his activity reportedly depends on real-life events). Stan, known for confusing grammar, a very low amount of English vocabulary, and love for potentially senseless posts, is discussably a non-wothy member of RPC; however a few of his statements regarded as examples were ultimately proven to be true, and so is tolerated by majority of English members, especially as he doesn't seem to try to take control of RPC.
Who wrote that? Personally, I vote for ya, man. You do seem like a mod guy. You wouldn't abuse it or anything (not that you would, spiral...).
Re: Off Topic
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 6:06 pm
by spiraldoor
iambored2006 wrote:You do seem like a mod guy. You wouldn't abuse it or anything (not that you would, spiral...).
You are being very vague and confusing.