Re: 3D Rayman Sequel?
Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2014 2:36 am
Everything I would not say, apart from personal opinions, I hold speeches balances, not him!everything Bradandez said is true
Everything I would not say, apart from personal opinions, I hold speeches balances, not him!everything Bradandez said is true
Yes, we both lack that. What's yer point?Lexis wrote:What you lack!Intelligence? Is that what you call it?
Why should I save it for my self only? I like to share with others through my own expressions!Lexis wrote:Congratulations! Save it for yourself like I did (after your provocation).Oh! So just cause you got fancy equipment you think you have a higher knowledge of art forms? Please, you're going to make me die of laughter. I'm a cartoonist and yet I can appreciate various art forms. I can tell the difference between past & present and with that Origins/Legends both look way better than previous installments because I can see the pure beauty in them. And that's my opinion.
Wow, you really don't make sense. I can't take you seriously now!Lexis wrote:Yes, so what better term talking about you!Haha! Cabbages!
Yes, you care about the "REAL RAYMAN".Lexis wrote:According to you, I care about anything?Is that an insult you piece of stale bread? I don't need your respect because I cannot take you seriously! ISN'T THAT IRONIC!?
You say shoddy, but according to many reviews both Origins/Legends have been considered as the best Platforming Games in years. True Masterpieces to BEHOLD! See my opinion, that can be shared with others! Not just blatant text saying Ancel is doing wrong.Lexis wrote:Or about yourself that guarantees shoddy products as Origins and Legends, who have defamed and distorted the real Rayman!Wow, you've really sunk low when you think ANCEL, freaking glorious, fabulous MICHEL ANCEL needs to change to make "A BETTER RAYMAN GAME". Shame on you .
You, also, having taste and touch! But please!
Clearly you do care, or you would have left all the way back on the previous page.Lexis wrote:To me the ting that you''ve taken I do not care, I want to leave this place!
All in all, also I enjoyed with this "strong tones" discussion!Oi, we're done with this. Bygones be bygones. I've had my fun, so let's get back onto topic.
Well! : )Okay, so if we're getting on topic, I think I'll say what I want out of a new 3D Rayman game.
I want a Rabbids remake.
Not a remake of the minigame collection Rabbids, but a remake of the original idea, with a few new things. For example, mix in a bit of the original Rayman 4 idea, have Rayman travel to areas from the original game, tainted by whatever evil force he's fighting. The main villains don't even have to be the Rabbids, though I personally wouldn't mind that.
Maybe the game would be like Super Mario 64, having Rayman explore huge worlds to find items in order to move on to the next.
I dunno, I just really want something like the cancelled Rayman 4.
A Rabbids remake? And it's a platformer? Not a bad idea. Though, the Rabbids can have their own world within the game if they're not going to be the main antagonists.Bionichute wrote:Okay, so if we're getting on topic, I think I'll say what I want out of a new 3D Rayman game.
I want a Rabbids remake.
Not a remake of the minigame collection Rabbids, but a remake of the original idea, with a few new things. For example, mix in a bit of the original Rayman 4 idea, have Rayman travel to areas from the original game, tainted by whatever evil force he's fighting. The main villains don't even have to be the Rabbids, though I personally wouldn't mind that.
Maybe the game would be like Super Mario 64, having Rayman explore huge worlds to find items in order to move on to the next.
I dunno, I just really want something like the cancelled Rayman 4.
But amazing concept art does!OldClassicGamer wrote:Rayman 4 by Phoenix will always be the greatest 3D Rayman game never made. Shame that no in-game screenshot or video exist.
Without forgetting Rayman 2 for Dreamcast.will always be the greatest 3D Rayman game never made.
I said "never made" which means cancelled.
Nope, I don't think Brits are a race.Adsolution wrote:The former is a racist generalisation of British people (and an entirely baseless one at that)Lexis wrote:I knew that British people were much traditionalists and conservators!
Well, it depends how sensitive your taxonomic scale is.Hunchman801 wrote:Nope, I don't think Brits are a race.Adsolution wrote:The former is a racist generalisation of British people (and an entirely baseless one at that)Lexis wrote:I knew that British people were much traditionalists and conservators!