Page 8 of 11

Re: >>> i'm a sig maker also

Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 5:27 pm
by Matyuv
NOOOOO, IT'S A RUY STYLE

Re: >>> i'm a sig maker also

Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 5:39 pm
by Xenon
Ruy's styles are okay, kind of.

Better than what I can do, lol.

Re: >>> i'm a sig maker also

Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 5:40 pm
by Matyuv
NOOO, RUY STYLE IS AWFUL
*vomits*

Re: >>> i'm a sig maker also

Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 5:50 pm
by Xenon
C'mon. Give over! :P

Re: >>> i'm a sig maker also

Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 6:59 pm
by th3()ne
ROFL. No Matyuv they're alright, my paint one is awful :lol:

Re: >>> i'm a sig maker also

Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 9:00 pm
by The Pasumanator
Ruy's style would be okay if it wasn't for the edges.

Re: >>> i'm a sig maker also

Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 9:06 pm
by Xenon
Meh, and the colors.

Re: >>> i'm a sig maker also

Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 9:08 pm
by Matyuv
PINKIE!

Re: >>> i'm a sig maker also

Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 9:11 pm
by Xenon
Pinkie pukie.

Re: >>> i'm a sig maker also

Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2005 10:37 am
by Punkard
Matyuv, could you make me another sig please?
You know the color and the theme, I guess.
Thanks.





....righto, I'll give you 50 tings for it! (No ruy style or another of those freaky ones allowed, k?)

Re: >>> i'm a sig maker also

Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:38 pm
by th3()ne
lol. How funny!

Re: >>> i'm a sig maker also

Posted: Sat Apr 02, 2005 11:16 am
by th3()ne
Whether taken by a photojournalist or captured by satellite; painted by Leonardo (Fig. 1) or by Breugel (Fig. 2); created by Malevich or drawn by Tatlin – there is no existing disciplinary model for understanding images that is definitive or exhaustive of the meanings that they convey to us and the value (or values) they have for us. This is why I began to develop a course in graphic design using a database model, with its potentially infinite archive and its defining filtering and sorting systems.

Re: >>> i'm a sig maker also

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 9:46 pm
by th3()ne
To get your attention... I wanna sig Matyuv

Re: >>> i'm a sig maker also

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 9:52 pm
by Xenon
Edit your posts man!

Re: >>> i'm a sig maker also

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 10:12 pm
by th3()ne
That last post was over a month ago. If I edit it, it won't count as a new post, and nobody will notice. See my logic?

Re: >>> i'm a sig maker also

Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 8:31 am
by Xenon
I vaguely see some form of logic in it, but just to get attention is not an invitation to double post.

Re: >>> i'm a sig maker also

Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 4:51 pm
by th3()ne
Read my post properly. When you edit a post, it dosn't count as a new one, so nobody will notice that this topic has been posted in and it will be ignored!!! See?? God...

Re: >>> i'm a sig maker also

Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 4:53 pm
by Jona
Th3()ne is right on this one. People practically never look in topics with white fists, and editing a post doesn't make it appear as gold (which means a new reply).

Re: >>> i'm a sig maker also

Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 5:09 pm
by th3()ne
Maybe you'll listen to Jona as he's more clever than me :lol: Maybe :D
...He is <_<

Re: >>> i'm a sig maker also

Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 5:24 pm
by Xenon
th3()ne wrote:Read my post properly. When you edit a post, it dosn't count as a new one, so nobody will notice that this topic has been posted in and it will be ignored!!! See?? God...
I'm just saying it (yes, as normal topics in PC) that it is bad to post twice. I'm not saying that in this topic, because I didn't know what you were talking about at first. :roll: