Page 72 of 263
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 1:17 am
by Jman
Xenon wrote:I think I have had a few problems with JPGs. Wait, are JPGs and JPEGs one of the same?
Yeah they are.
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 1:22 am
by Xenon
Well, I'm not friendly with them then. As far as I remember, I encountered similar problems I had with GIFs.
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 1:23 am
by Jman
You should avoid using that file type as much as possible.
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 1:25 am
by Xenon
Yeah, I can't stand GIFs. I stay on the safe side nowadays and choose PNG.
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 1:26 am
by Acarr
GIF = Problems.
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 1:28 am
by Xenon
Though I know PNGs don't support image transparency, which disables me from using it when making a transparent pic

Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 1:29 am
by Acarr
Ah, so that must be the problem I keep encountering...
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 1:30 am
by Xenon
Do you see white corners for each of the avatars we have?
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 1:32 am
by Jman
Actually some of the avatars that we use are in PNG format. PNGs support transparency.
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 1:32 am
by Acarr
@Xenon: Nope, only on Google or if they're saved.
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 1:34 am
by Xenon
Jman wrote:Actually some of the avatars that we use are in PNG format. PNGs support transparency.
Are you sure? I know we have avatars with no white corners, but I thought these were all GIFs?
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 1:35 am
by Acarr
I know the top pic is GIF, but the ranks...?
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 1:38 am
by Xenon
Some of the older ranks we have here are GIFs. Like most of the Hoodlum ones.
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 1:40 am
by Acarr
It's quite hard to tell.
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 1:51 am
by Jman
Xenon wrote:Jman wrote:Actually some of the avatars that we use are in PNG format. PNGs support transparency.
Are you sure? I know we have avatars with no white corners, but I thought these were all GIFs?
I am sure. I had to go back and edit them when a while ago before we switched to PHPbb3. Take a look at Acarr's rank.
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 1:53 am
by Xenon
Yeah, but from my downstairs computer the Hippie rank has white edges.
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 1:58 am
by Acarr
Aww, it's gotta be the hippy, eh?
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 2:06 am
by Jman
Xenon wrote:Yeah, but from my downstairs computer the Hippie rank has white edges.
Then the browser that you use probably doesn't support PNG transparencies. IE7 (not any older IE's) and other web browsers can recognize PNG transparencies.
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:02 am
by Acarr
7/10

Looks cool, but I've seen it before.
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:22 am
by Holy Crap
Xenon wrote:Though I know PNGs don't support image transparency, which disables me from using it when making a transparent pic

You're silly. PNG's have transparency.