Page 75 of 90

Re: Rayman Zone Discussion.

Posted: Sat May 23, 2009 4:22 pm
by timoo
Was the game even OK?

Re: Rayman Zone Discussion.

Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 3:05 pm
by spiraldoor
Nobody knows. The only part of the game that was ever noticed or acknowledged was...that.

Re: Rayman Zone Discussion.

Posted: Tue May 26, 2009 7:16 pm
by Xenon
OMFG.

I have been banned from the RaymanZone for the following reason:
Flaming, arguing in forums despite being asked to discuss issue in PT. Several warnings given and ignored, suspended one month
Flaming? Where have I flamed anyone? Does Kleaneasy even know what flaming means?
Arguing? She said herself that our discussion "should not be an argument, and should not be considered as one".
Several warnings? She never warned me about anything - she just asked me to discuss issues in a private topic. And that's not 'several', either.

Fuck this shoddy administration.

Re: Rayman Zone Discussion.

Posted: Tue May 26, 2009 7:23 pm
by Cairnie
God what a bossy cunt

Re: Rayman Zone Discussion.

Posted: Tue May 26, 2009 7:35 pm
by stan423321
This reminds me how was I banned from a Polish Rayman forum. There was even no information WHY the admin banned me, buty I believe that's because I felt in nostalgia when reminded of old good times with old admin. What's even more annoying, a lot of users asked me to send them RRR-GBA rom, and post it in the forums - what means they didn't know I was banned! As long as I know, any information about my ban was hidden (dunno, as admin even din't let me VIEW FORUMS!).

Re: Rayman Zone Discussion.

Posted: Tue May 26, 2009 10:23 pm
by Tobbe
Xenon wrote:OMFG.

I have been banned from the RaymanZone for the following reason:
Flaming, arguing in forums despite being asked to discuss issue in PT. Several warnings given and ignored, suspended one month
Flaming? Where have I flamed anyone? Does Kleaneasy even know what flaming means?
Arguing? She said herself that our discussion "should not be an argument, and should not be considered as one".
Several warnings? She never warned me about anything - she just asked me to discuss issues in a private topic. And that's not 'several', either.
Welcome to the club, mate.

Re: Rayman Zone Discussion.

Posted: Tue May 26, 2009 10:39 pm
by Xenon
At least it's only RaymanZone I guess, haha. I just think it's ridiculous how she deals with certain situations - she just bans anyone who contests her perfect opinion. My argument was friendly anyway (hence the ' :P ' emoticon). Mark me she'll be getting a very friendly PT when I return!

Re: Rayman Zone Discussion.

Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 1:42 am
by Hunchman801
All I can say is that things haven't changed much in six years :)

Re: Rayman Zone Discussion.

Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 6:15 am
by Limely
You were sort of asking for it. Though I think she kind of took the easy way out... It's not a perma-ban, is it? Because that would be silly.

Re: Rayman Zone Discussion.

Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 7:50 am
by Holy Crap
What's he done?

Re: Rayman Zone Discussion.

Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 8:14 am
by Matyuv
link pls?

Re: Rayman Zone Discussion.

Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 11:00 am
by Cairnie

Re: Rayman Zone Discussion.

Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 11:14 am
by Xenon
Yeah, it's clearly just a cheap way around. The post in red (yes, I'm allowed to view a topic for a few seconds it seems) was originally a point against Kleaneasy's argument which was then deleted. I then posted another asking why she should delete my posts and also stating her post was hypocritical as she herself was not 'on topic' (again containing the ' :p ' emot) - but that seems to have been edited, haha.

I'll have to admit I've been giving Kleaneasy the run-around for the past few months, but that's clearly not an excuse to ban me. :P

Re: Rayman Zone Discussion.

Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 12:21 pm
by sfn42
This kleaneasy person is a real tyrant. I have some moderating-experience and I consider myself a pretty strict moderator but I'm nothing compared to her. I got the impression that every time she posts an argument she ends it with something with the meaning of "If you disagree and you say so, you'll get banned". IMO, she is totally unsuitable for managing a forum. But that's nothing new with Ubisoft. I was banned from the old forums without ever getting any explanation why it was done. I never even found out who did it.

Re: Rayman Zone Discussion.

Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 12:34 pm
by Cairnie
All the times I've ever banned people on a certain LJ community I mod, I usually give reason publicly though mostly I've dealt with spammers. I just think it's common courtesy to give an elaborate reason on why a person is banned from any community.

Re: Rayman Zone Discussion.

Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 3:32 pm
by spiraldoor
Xenon wrote:Yeah, it's clearly just a cheap way around. The post in red (yes, I'm allowed to view a topic for a few seconds it seems) was originally a point against Kleaneasy's argument which was then deleted.
What was the point she deleted?

Re: Rayman Zone Discussion.

Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 3:55 pm
by Xenon
I can't remember but it was something about off-topicness and its existence in every forum.

Re: Rayman Zone Discussion.

Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 6:08 pm
by Limely
Your avatars a while back probably didn't help, haha.

Re: Rayman Zone Discussion.

Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 6:16 pm
by Xenon
She still hasn't removed the "Speed Hump" one, I don't believe, which had some pretty strong implications!

Re: Rayman Zone Discussion.

Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 6:51 pm
by Limely
That one wasn't that bad.
Anyway, it's gone and has been so for a while I think.