Re: Rayman M-Arena
Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 10:21 am
Like you three did, welcoming me to the forum.Holy Crap wrote:Well, I'd suggest you avoid making posts solely for post count.
Rayman Pirate-Community
Rayman M-Arena
Page 79 of 164
Re: Rayman M-Arena
Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 10:48 am
Then you're obviously assuming those welcome messages were insincere. But well, why would I give a shit?Romagia wrote:Like you three did, welcoming me to the forum.
Re: Rayman M-Arena
Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 1:51 pm
Why would i assume otherwise?Hunchman801 wrote:Then you're obviously assuming those welcome messages were insincere. But well, why would I give a shit?Romagia wrote:Like you three did, welcoming me to the forum.
Re: Rayman M-Arena
Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 1:58 pm
Who said you should assume otherwise?Romagia wrote:Why would i assume otherwise?
Re: Rayman M-Arena
Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 3:47 pm
But was i assuming wrong?
Re: Rayman M-Arena
Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 5:25 pm
My welcome post was not made for post count. 
Re: Rayman M-Arena
Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 6:21 pm
But you didn't welcome me... at least in this threadPluMGMK wrote:My welcome post was not made for post count.
Re: Rayman M-Arena
Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 6:24 pm
I meant in the Introducing Topic.
Re: Rayman M-Arena
Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 7:00 pm
I'm a bit confused, but let's stay on topic [...]
Re: Rayman M-Arena
Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 7:03 pm
What's there to be confused about? 
Re: Rayman M-Arena
Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 7:20 pm
Thought of multiple meanings about Plu's postAcarr wrote:What's there to be confused about?
Re: Rayman M-Arena
Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 7:33 pm
Actually, I don't think you should assume either of those propositions, considering that it is absolutely impossible to find out.Romagia wrote:But was i assuming wrong?
Re: Rayman M-Arena
Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 7:46 pm
Unless they tell me what they have been thinking when they made the posts.Hunchman801 wrote:Actually, I don't think you should assume either of those propositions, considering that it is absolutely impossible to find out.Romagia wrote:But was i assuming wrong?
Re: Rayman M-Arena
Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 7:59 pm
Then you will have to assume that they are telling the truth, which is not always the case.Romagia wrote:Unless they tell me what they have been thinking when they made the posts.
Re: Rayman M-Arena
Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 10:32 pm
All this assumptions confuse me...Hunchman801 wrote:Then you will have to assume that they are telling the truth, which is not always the case.Romagia wrote:Unless they tell me what they have been thinking when they made the posts.
Re: Rayman M-Arena
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 7:18 am
This conversation seems completely pointless.
Re: Rayman M-Arena
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 3:15 pm
It's not really a great first impression to accuse people who welcome you of posting messages solely to increase their post count... 
Re: Rayman M-Arena
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 3:25 pm
Mhm...Xenon wrote:It's not really a great first impression to accuse people who welcome you of posting messages solely to increase their post count...
I'm sorry...
Re: Rayman M-Arena
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 6:34 pm
I was hoping to win over your loyalty so that I may be able to use it to my advantage at some point in the future, though this post rather destroys that particular avenue.Romagia wrote:Unless they tell me what they have been thinking when they made the posts.Hunchman801 wrote:Actually, I don't think you should assume either of those propositions, considering that it is absolutely impossible to find out.Romagia wrote:But was i assuming wrong?
Re: Rayman M-Arena
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 6:58 pm
I was immagining something like thatspiraldoor wrote:I was hoping to win over your loyalty so that I may be able to use it to my advantage at some point in the future, though this post rather destroys that particular avenue.Romagia wrote:Unless they tell me what they have been thinking when they made the posts.Hunchman801 wrote:Actually, I don't think you should assume either of those propositions, considering that it is absolutely impossible to find out.Romagia wrote:But was i assuming wrong?
