Re: Rayman Origins
Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 9:27 pm
It happens, let the conversation flow, if it gets way out of hand, the mods are here to put things straight.
Nah, I'm not what you'd ever call a member of the "forum police". I'm actually really OK with off-topic discussion, as long as there is a clear link back to the original topic matter (which there is in this case). As you said, no need to disrupt the flow so long as it's relatively calm and orderly.Master wrote:Ah, ok.
Hm, that could be a good thing though, newer members tend to demand that the intended topic be stuck to, it's nice to see that you value the conversation more than being limited to a topic which conversation can be burnt out upon. Going off-topic is perfectly fine if there's interesting discussion to be had.
Actually, he looks more like Darkwing Duck.SegaNintendoUbisoft wrote:Oh my god, that is EXACTLY what he reminded me of. It's been bothering me for quite a while.THEdragon wrote:And he looks like the stranger kids are warned about in those 'stranger danger' educational shorts.SegaNintendoUbisoft wrote:Yeah, it sounds like the name of a pre-school tv show villain.THEdragon wrote:Don't get mad at me for this but I don't think "Mr Dark" is a very creative villain name.
Hey there kid wanna see the puppy in the back of my van
No, he looks like Tricky Dicky.Henchman1028 wrote:Actually, he looks more like Darkwing Duck.SegaNintendoUbisoft wrote:Oh my god, that is EXACTLY what he reminded me of. It's been bothering me for quite a while.THEdragon wrote:And he looks like the stranger kids are warned about in those 'stranger danger' educational shorts.SegaNintendoUbisoft wrote:Yeah, it sounds like the name of a pre-school tv show villain.THEdragon wrote:Don't get mad at me for this but I don't think "Mr Dark" is a very creative villain name.
Hey there kid wanna see the puppy in the back of my van
Adsolution wrote:So we should remove grounded theories from the Wiki, even when it's stated to only be hypothetical due to a lack of clarity? That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard. A Wiki is a source of collective knowledge, and where there is none, we provide very plausible and likely intended speculation as to what they truth may be. This is the same for every single Wikipedia article that speaks about a topic science hasn't mastered yet.sergiomonty wrote:The Mr Dark article should be edited to a more generic representation of the battle until a new source confirms what is truly happening.
It should be something like "During the final encounter, Mr Dark flies off-screen, and a big monster appears. The Atari Jaguar version, which holds a lifebar with the face of Mr Dark, suggests that this monster could possibly be a transformation of Mr. Dark himself. The monster attacks with blah blah blah..."
Anyone here agrees?

Well at least we will all agree on one thing. That is creepy looking.sergiomonty wrote:Adsolution wrote:So we should remove grounded theories from the Wiki, even when it's stated to only be hypothetical due to a lack of clarity? That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard. A Wiki is a source of collective knowledge, and where there is none, we provide very plausible and likely intended speculation as to what they truth may be. This is the same for every single Wikipedia article that speaks about a topic science hasn't mastered yet.sergiomonty wrote:The Mr Dark article should be edited to a more generic representation of the battle until a new source confirms what is truly happening.
It should be something like "During the final encounter, Mr Dark flies off-screen, and a big monster appears. The Atari Jaguar version, which holds a lifebar with the face of Mr Dark, suggests that this monster could possibly be a transformation of Mr. Dark himself. The monster attacks with blah blah blah..."
Anyone here agrees?
Fuck Raywiki and its made up theories, then.
Shapeshifting my balls. Or what? is that shapeshifting and clonation at the same time?... right.