Rayman Pirate-Community

Thats good

Amazing!

I know, really good!

Great!

Yep

What am I supposed to reply?

You can reply if you want, I suppose.

Hunchman801 wrote:What am I supposed to reply?

Something like "ORSUM!" will do.

Or awesome. it doesn't matter really.

Bump!

may I change my vote in the poll? I’m using a 19-inch 1280x1024 (yes, 5:4) display.

Mine is 1600 x 900

1336x768

Fifo wrote:Bump!

may I change my vote in the poll? I’m using a 19-inch 1280x1024 (yes, 5:4) display.

I'm afraid that won't be possible with out changing the poll. Which is out of date, yet historical.


Though I gotta admit, I'm highly amused with this option. "2048x1536 (LOL)". Nice one Matyuv.


As for my current resolution, it is 2560 x 1440, an IPS display. I do have a CRT that'll do 1920 x 1200 native or even be pushed to 2560 x 1600 at 70Hz.

Hmm, given how much displays have changed since this poll was first put up, perhaps a refresh is in order.

Hoodcom wrote:I do have a CRT that'll do 1920 x 1200 native or even be pushed to 2560 x 1600 at 70Hz.

Makes me wonder how 240p will end up looking on this if your CRT does 1920x1200 native.

Master wrote:Hmm, given how much displays have changed since this poll was first put up, perhaps a refresh is in order.

Could make for quite a big poll too.

Afterall, we gotta count for a lot of various displays.

Granted I supposed anything below 1024 x 768 is no longer needed unless we are talking retro computing use, but we have up to 5k displays in this day and age.

emshomar wrote:

Hoodcom wrote:I do have a CRT that'll do 1920 x 1200 native or even be pushed to 2560 x 1600 at 70Hz.

Makes me wonder how 240p will end up looking on this if your CRT does 1920x1200 native.

Pretty freaking good, because here's the fun part about CRT. Lower resolutions actually DO look good. Unlike LCD technology.

Hoodcom wrote:I do have a CRT that'll do 1920 x 1200 native or even be pushed to 2560 x 1600 at 70Hz.

A 1920x1200 CRT!? Wow! How big/heavy is it?

Check this out! http://www.geek.com/games/john-carmack- ... 5-1422971/

Hoodcom wrote:Lower resolutions actually DO look good. Unlike LCD technology.

Very true!

If I could only find a cheap way to hook up a PC to a CRT television.

Fifo wrote:Check this out! http://www.geek.com/games/john-carmack- ... 5-1422971/

I bet that must have been horribly expensive at that time...

Fifo wrote:A 1920x1200 CRT!? Wow! How big/heavy is it?

Weight is about 100 pounds / 42kg, it's quite heavy. Manual on it, if you wish to look: https://docs.sony.com/release/GDMFW900.PDF

Hoodcom wrote:

Fifo wrote:A 1920x1200 CRT!? Wow! How big/heavy is it?

Weight is about 100 pounds / 42kg, it's quite heavy. Manual on it, if you wish to look: https://docs.sony.com/release/GDMFW900.PDF

I don’t think I’d be able to handle such a thing myself!

I’m currently reading the manual.