Rayman Pirate-Community

Dart wrote:< drew something

< wants to see what you drew

Tunderous wrote:

Dart wrote:< drew something

< wants to see what you drew

< has a draft here: http://zelda-mays.tumblr.com/image/157223578559

Dart wrote:< has a draft here: http://zelda-mays.tumblr.com/image/157223578559

< says its very nice
< wonders what it looks like with color

Dart wrote: < drew something

< Quite excited to see the finished results!
< Will probably draw soon, too.

< just noticed there's a really good humble bundle on at the moment if anyone's interested: https://www.humblebundle.com/freedom

< agrees it is a very nice humble bundle
< says good morning

< has an obnoxious write up that was made even more obnoxious due to a last minute change to the assignment brief
< was supposed to work on it during today and tomorrow, but <'s enthusiasm for said write up is so minimal, that <'s not made any further progress on it.
That being said, < has done a significant portion of it already, but it's not been of great interest.

< is too lazy to read ^'s message because its so fucking long in <'s vision

< sees ^ ripped off part of <'s signature.

Tunderous wrote:< Has just joined the forums

< thinks you should also join the RaymanPC Discord server

https://discord.me/RaymanPC

< says "HOLY FUCK THANK YOU"

< is disappointed that the special rank is gone. No matter, < will try to win Season 100.

< says "HOLY FUCK THANK YOU" to ^

Ray502 wrote:< sees ^ ripped off part of <'s signature.

< says "ayy lmao" to ^

Hmm, < sees ^ lost the transparency, did ^ try saving as a png?

< thinks ^^ is borderline spamming.

Master wrote:< has an obnoxious write up that was made even more obnoxious due to a last minute change to the assignment brief
< was supposed to work on it during today and tomorrow, but <'s enthusiasm for said write up is so minimal, that <'s not made any further progress on it.
That being said, < has done a significant portion of it already, but it's not been of great interest.

< cant seem to recall, but is ^ still in Uni?

Ayup, still in uni. < enjoys it for the most part, there are just some parts which < doesn't like. Then < whinges to the extreme for a bit, then gets it done.

< is stuck in bed, but <'s caffeine headache will soon change this...

PluMGMK wrote:If men wear perfume then < wonders what cologne is. < is obviously as clueless as Ray on this!

< says they're synonyms.

Ray502 wrote:< feels like <'s been one of the top posters so far this year.

< checked and you're in fact number one.

Ambidextroid wrote:< was mulling over the infinite monkeys with typewriters theory, where supposedly they would have a 100% chance of writing every conceivable string of characters, and came to a strange conclusion.

First of all, the theorem states that one monkey hitting keys at random forever will almost surely type any finite string. It says nothing about an army of monkeys, infinite or not, but we'll get there.

Ambidextroid wrote:< imagines its actually possible that every monkey just presses the A key forever, or just infinite gibberish, so there's no guarantee that they type any specific string.

There is a possibility that one or all of the monkeys press the A key forever, but the probability of it happening is zero. The theorem only states that the probability that one monkey types a certain finite string is 1, which you can easily extend to several monkeys or even an infinity of them, because, given two monkeys M1 and M2, and a finite string S, P(M1 types S) = P(M2 types S) = 1 (that's the theorem), and those two events being supposedly independent, P(M1 types S & M2 types S) = P(M1 types S) × P(M2 types S) = 1. Think proof by induction and you'll cover all cases. So, like you said, there is no guarantee, but the definition of almost surely is that the probability is 1, leaving room for other possible cases with probability 0.

Ambidextroid wrote:That being said, the likelihood of the monkeys typing any string increases proportionally to the amount of monkeys, and if the amount of monkeys is infinite then the possibility of them writing every conceivable word is multiplied by infinity, in other words an infinitely large possibility or 100%.

Let's bring back our monkeys M1 and M2 and finite string S. Your wording is quite confusing, but I assume you're talking about the probability that, among an infinite number of monkeys, one writes S. Well, P(M1 types S or M2 types S) = 1 - P(M1 does not type S & M2 does not type S) = 1 - P(M1 does not type S) × P(M2 does not type S) = 1 - (1 - P(M1 types S)) × (1 - P(M2 types S)) = 1 - (1 - 1) × (1 - 1) = 1 (using the theorem again). You can easily see why adding an infinite numbers of monkeys won't change the probability, therefore your assertion that said probability is proportional to the number of monkeys is incorrect. Don't forget that probabilities can never exceed 1.

Ambidextroid wrote:So basically it's a paradox, the monkeys have both a 100% chance of typing everything while at the same time not being guaranteed to type everything.

Interestingly enough, your incorrect proof led you to the right value as the monkeys (whether one or all, whether they're finite or infinite) have a 100% chance of typing a given finite string. It means that the probability is 1, which translates as almost sure, not sure or guaranteed. No paradox here.

Hunchman801 wrote:

Ray502 wrote:< feels like <'s been one of the top posters so far this year.

< checked and you're in fact number one.

Aaand damn, < got beaten. Hurt me, what about <'s score ? < became inactive as fuck for 2017

nr0r wrote:< is stuck in bed, but <'s caffeine headache will soon change this...

Aaarrrh, coffee withdrawal is abominable.
< remembers < got palpitations after two weeks without caffeine.