Re: The You Game!
Posted: Sat May 20, 2017 8:35 pm
IT WORKED IT WORKED !
< is completely euphoric now, may that thing continue to work.
< is completely euphoric now, may that thing continue to work.
< went into only only seeing a couple of others from this season. <'s main gripe (?) is that the way they're trying to skip from going to one scene in time to another and it felt all over the place and in <'s opinion felt un-neeedMaster wrote:< really enjoyed it, though < is a bit wary. Moffat has a tendency to have a really good build-up, and then flop with the payoff. < isn't sure <'ll be able to catch next week's episode for a while, so < might wait until the whole thing is done before < gives <'s thoughts.
< is happy for ^^. < knows how difficult it can be to get Linux stuff working on NTFS partitions…incognito wrote:IT WORKED IT WORKED !
< is completely euphoric now, may that thing continue to work.
It's a fair point, < does think the flashbacks didn't need to be spread out as they were, < wonders if Moffat was unsure about how to put the vault reveal in place.Serza5 wrote:< went into only only seeing a couple of others from this season. <'s main gripe (?) is that the way they're trying to skip from going to one scene in time to another and it felt all over the place and in <'s opinion felt un-neeedMaster wrote:< really enjoyed it, though < is a bit wary. Moffat has a tendency to have a really good build-up, and then flop with the payoff. < isn't sure <'ll be able to catch next week's episode for a while, so < might wait until the whole thing is done before < gives <'s thoughts.
Then again from what <'s heard and is semi related to ^'s point < believes Moffat has the tendency to make things complicated for no reason other than possibly aesthetic
< actually realizes that NTFS is in fact a really good tool, not everything from Microsoft is shit seemingly, the file system in fact supports POSIX.PluMGMK wrote:< is happy for ^^. < knows how difficult it can be to get Linux stuff working on NTFS partitions…incognito wrote:IT WORKED IT WORKED !
< is completely euphoric now, may that thing continue to work.
< has an NTFS partition mounted normally, but has to unmount it when starting <'s shiny new Windows VM. < would like to use cifs-utils to be able to remount it as an SMB share. For some reason though Windows doesn't want me to be able to access SMB shares of entire partitions, even though I can mount subdirectories just fine…
< once did that but then at some point <'s distro decided to start shipping an NTFS module that prevented files on NTFS partitions from being executable.incognito wrote:< was able to set up a fake PlayOnLinux folder using symlinks pointing to his NTFS hard disk, to save the Linux Disk Space. It wasn't easy.
< wonders which distro started doing that?PluMGMK wrote:< once did that but then at some point <'s distro decided to start shipping an NTFS module that prevented files on NTFS partitions from being executable.incognito wrote:< was able to set up a fake PlayOnLinux folder using symlinks pointing to his NTFS hard disk, to save the Linux Disk Space. It wasn't easy.Thankfully < is no longer bound to the vagaries of distros…
< wonders if they were really needed in the first place. < can't help but ponder if it'd been best just to reveal who was in the vault, and have the flashback later on to clarify. Either ways, it is Moffat's last series, so time will tell if the next series will wobble on this.Serza5 wrote:< thinks at the very least they'd be better if each segment before the next flashbacks where bigger so they don't feel as scattered
< thinks it was Mint.Hoodcom wrote:< wonders which distro started doing that?PluMGMK wrote:< once did that but then at some point <'s distro decided to start shipping an NTFS module that prevented files on NTFS partitions from being executable.incognito wrote:< was able to set up a fake PlayOnLinux folder using symlinks pointing to his NTFS hard disk, to save the Linux Disk Space. It wasn't easy.Thankfully < is no longer bound to the vagaries of distros…
< could sort of see them working? But even then given that the next epsisode would continue on this arc it might've been better to have episodes dedicated to the particular flash back and then bring them together at one pointMaster wrote:< wonders if they were really needed in the first place. < can't help but ponder if it'd been best just to reveal who was in the vault, and have the flashback later on to clarify. Either ways, it is Moffat's last series, so time will tell if the next series will wobble on this.Serza5 wrote:< thinks at the very least they'd be better if each segment before the next flashbacks where bigger so they don't feel as scattered
The thing is, < isn't sure if the vault will play a part in the next parts of this 3-parter, or if it's just more slow burn until the series finale. If it does turn out to tie into this arc, then < thinks it'd be alright. But if it's just a small part of the overall series arc, then < probably would have preferred to have waited on it.Serza5 wrote:< could sort of see them working? But even then given that the next epsisode would continue on this arc it might've been better to have episodes dedicated to the particular flash back and then bring them together at one pointMaster wrote:< wonders if they were really needed in the first place. < can't help but ponder if it'd been best just to reveal who was in the vault, and have the flashback later on to clarify. Either ways, it is Moffat's last series, so time will tell if the next series will wobble on this.Serza5 wrote:< thinks at the very least they'd be better if each segment before the next flashbacks where bigger so they don't feel as scattered
< wonders what ^ uses now?PluMGMK wrote:
< thinks it was Mint.
< just upgraded to GNOME 3.24 and now the fonts in qutebrowser look much nicer!