Rayman Pirate-Community

< never learned C++ so < would find it difficult.

Hunchman801 wrote:

Serza5 wrote:< thinks C++ is alright and is amazed people find it that difficult

< asks you when and why you should make a destructor virtual then.

< wonders why you ask that

Serza5 wrote:< wonders why you ask that

< is just curious how well you know C++.

PluMGMK wrote:Meat? Well, < is a vegetarian…

So, < has something to ask you :
You could even have that young girl for dessert.

Lysol wrote:You could even have that young girl for dessert.

< is afraid Plum is probably not Bambooz alike.

Hunchman801 wrote:

Serza5 wrote:< wonders why you ask that

< is just curious how well you know C++.

< isn't too versed in using de/constructors in practice but from what < understands virtual destructors are used for when you want to delete an instance of a class using a pointer

Serza5 wrote:< isn't too versed in using de/constructors in practice but from what < understands virtual destructors are used for when you want to delete an instance of a class using a pointer

< says that's why you don't find C++ hard: you've only scratched the surface of it, and trust me, there's much more complex than the example I gave.

That's why < has been attempting to get back into c++ via unreal although other priorities have taken place

< wonders if anyone around here has 3d skills to help me with the manipulation of a 3d file.

Serza5 wrote:That's why < has been attempting to get back into c++ via unreal although other priorities have taken place

< wishes you luck for the next step then (start with OOP)!

< is hardly that far behind

< has been continuing <'s week of playing old games < haven't played in a long time.

< should probably break out the Half-Life series at some point in the near future…

< tried HL 1 & 2 at some point before but < stopped mostly because < was terrible at the games

< didn't let terribleness stop < from finishing HL1 though. Sure < was looking at YouTube every ten minutes, but whatever…
< thinks the problem was that < hadn't figured out how to increase the game's resolution and so couldn't really make anything out. < guesses that since the only other game < knew from that era was Rayman 2, < assumed lo-res was part of the experience.
< has got a lot better since!

< tends to drop games as soon as < gets one that < can play
< should pick it up again eventually especially since < has had a lot more FPS experience

< will be getting another haircut tomorrow since the 1/2 inch cut at the barber shop a couple weeks ago wasn't enough.

PluMGMK wrote:< didn't let terribleness stop < from finishing HL1 though.

How can you longer play vanilla HL1 ?
Ther's this < says. The version in the video does not longer seem to be here, but the author who commented the page made a new version (link in comments), a tad different, too bad he got rid of the super badass soundtrack though, but anyway, mechanics like slowmotion were added.

This talk of Half Life reminds < that < still has to go through them. They're in <'s library, waiting...

<'s only played HL1, < was planning on playing 2 but < heard a spoiler somewhere and was waiting until < forgot it before starting. That was years ago now and <'s certainly forgotten so < doesn't have an excuse not to play it now