Rayman Pirate-Community

< likes that someone finds < amusing

Oh, so < is someone now???
Too bad nobody finds < amusing....
Just kidding, < knows all of you think < is amusing because < will fall for anything

< wonders would ^ rather be someone or something?

Yes. < would rather be ^ and ^ would rather be <.
Oh wait no ^ wouldn't because < isn't great like ^.

< wonders why ^ wouldn't see ^'s self as great?

Because < has never said < is great! DUH! Well now < has

< finds ^ should have that in the "I have never/I didn't" game

Yup, and once again < has caused everybody to leave
< is just kidding but < realizes that < can be very insensitive so < apologizes to anyone that > may have made unncomfortable in talking to <.

< noticed ^ like's >

< doesn't see insensitivity from ^ and ^ is usually just joking, though when < doesn't see an emoticon, < can assume something is serious

PluMGMK wrote:

Birds858 wrote:

The Jonster wrote:Droite...

Faut que j’aille demandé, il y a quoi à droite.

C'est pas aussi marrant que « Fixé mon portable » mais c'est un truc du même genre.

incognito wrote:Ah ouais elle est excellente

boomboleros7 wrote:

PluMGMK wrote:

Birds858 wrote:

The Jonster wrote:Droite...

Faut que j’aille demandé, il y a quoi à droite.

C'était excellent.
La suite est pas mal :

The Jonster wrote:

Steo wrote:

The Jonster wrote:

Birds858 wrote:

The Jonster wrote:Droite...

Faut que j’aille demandé, il y a quoi à droite.

Faut que j’aille demandé, quelle était cette environ alors?

Le contraire de gauche ?

Jamais l'esprit.

Well, at least < is going to become notoriously infamous for making the unfortunate mistake of saying "right" thinking < can use it as sarcasm...or < so believes
< is at least happy that everyone is laughing at < for <'s miserable failure instead of insulting < because < didn't have any intention to talk down on anyone
< must say, Birds is going to get a kick out of this tomorrow.
Speaking of which, < wonders if there's a bloopers topic on this forum.....
.....should < make more fails/bloopers for the Frenchies' entertainment???

< doesn't even know how bad < messed up yet. < is waiting to hear it

Yup, < is probably going to be punished for this later. < knows.
Oh well, at least < had fun trying.
Maybe < should also come up with a blooper topic on this forum and then everybody can laugh at how < messed up.

The Jonster wrote:

PluMGMK wrote:

Birds858 wrote:

The Jonster wrote:Droite...

Faut que j’aille demandé, il y a quoi à droite.

C'est pas aussi marrant que « Fixé mon portable » mais c'est un truc du même genre.

incognito wrote:Ah ouais elle est excellente

boomboleros7 wrote:

PluMGMK wrote:

Birds858 wrote:

The Jonster wrote:Droite...

Faut que j’aille demandé, il y a quoi à droite.

C'était excellent.
La suite est pas mal :

The Jonster wrote:

Steo wrote:

The Jonster wrote:

Birds858 wrote:

The Jonster wrote:Droite...

Faut que j’aille demandé, il y a quoi à droite.

Faut que j’aille demandé, quelle était cette environ alors?

Le contraire de gauche ?

Jamais l'esprit.

Well, at least < is going to become notoriously infamous for making the unfortunate mistake of saying "right" thinking < can use it as sarcasm...or < so believes
< is at least happy that everyone is laughing at < for <'s miserable failure instead of insulting < because < didn't have any intention to talk down on anyone
< must say, Birds is going to get a kick out of this tomorrow.
Speaking of which, < wonders if there's a bloopers topic on this forum.....
.....should < make more fails/bloopers for the Frenchies' entertainment???

There is a confusion here, in that post < was laughing at Pirez's post, to be more accurate, at the post < has in his sigg ATM

Oops, < bad then. Thanks though.

Hmmm... < still wonders about what < said earlier in that post, but nvm. < thinks it will be probably just make PluM mad at <

< has to get up early tomorrow so < is going to bed in a bit.
.....< hates getting up at 5 though...

Translated in fairly reasonable English it translates to this :

Oh no, I fuck everything and nothing. More of nothing. But potentially everything.

< says that it sums up the mindset of some members like < whom'st think they'll die alone.

< was thinking of adding that quote to <'s collection, but wasn't sure if Pirez would be comfortable with that. But now ^ has sigged it, obviating the need for < to do so. Also, "whom'st"?

^ has a collection??? What??
Edit: oh nvm, < forgot about THAT.

incognito wrote:Translated in fairly reasonable English it translates to this :

Oh no, I fuck everything and nothing. More of nothing. But potentially everything.

< says that it sums up the mindset of some members like < whom'st think they'll die alone.

< wonders that about <self from time to time...

< has gotten up earlier than usual. < has another long day today, but < hopes < can get some studying done for Monday/Tuesday (< might wait that long to start).

If < isn't mistaken though, < basically said something like "But I'm probably fails miserably" when the way the language structure varies, meaning < should have basically said "but I probably fail". < knows the context is different in French but that's more or less the English to <'s error from the previous page

< remembers PluM telling < when < made that post to say “agree” or somethibg instead of “right”. Now < is wondering how the word agree is used for sarcasm...

< assumes it's just like English. One must pick up on the Sarcasm.