Re: Finding Out The Original Rayman 2
Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:06 pm
Every accent is crap.
Huh? W-what? How does that work?spiraldoor said:
Every accent is crap.
That technically means that yours is as well.
Rayman Pirate-Community
Finding Out The Original Rayman 2
Page 10 of 11
Re: Finding Out The Original Rayman 2
Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 6:46 am
That technically means that yours is as well.
Re: Finding Out The Original Rayman 2
Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 1:15 pm
I don't have one.
If I did, it would be crap, just like any other.
If I did, it would be crap, just like any other.
Re: Finding Out The Original Rayman 2
Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 2:33 pm
This makes no sense.spiraldoor wrote:I don't have one.
Re: Finding Out The Original Rayman 2
Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 2:08 am
Agreed. Everyone has an accent of some description.
Re: Finding Out The Original Rayman 2
Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 3:57 pm
Not me.
Re: Finding Out The Original Rayman 2
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 2:02 am
Well there are only two ways that could work (NOTE: Only one of them makes sense):
1. You have a background consisting of every different culture, meaning your voice sounds like all accents moulded together, which makes them cancel each other out and gives you no accent.
OR
2. You are an inanimate object, so you have no accent.
1. You have a background consisting of every different culture, meaning your voice sounds like all accents moulded together, which makes them cancel each other out and gives you no accent.
OR
2. You are an inanimate object, so you have no accent.
Re: Finding Out The Original Rayman 2
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 4:34 pm
The first one is correct, except for that multicultural shit.
Re: Finding Out The Original Rayman 2
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 4:40 pm
'Accent' tends to refer to ways of speaking OUTSIDE your region. So in essence everyone who shares your "accent", has no accent. I think.
Re: Finding Out The Original Rayman 2
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 4:47 pm
That's deep, man...
Re: Finding Out The Original Rayman 2
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 7:33 pm
Miserable attempt at a pun, there.spiraldoor wrote:That's deep, man...
Re: Finding Out The Original Rayman 2
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 1:55 pm
That was in NO way an attempt at a pun. Did you think that my use of the word "deep" was in some way a reference to people who have deep voices or something? No. 
Re: Finding Out The Original Rayman 2
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 1:11 pm
aaaaaahhh... Now I'm really confused. Could we please try and get back on topic? This accent stuff is hurting my brain.
Re: Finding Out The Original Rayman 2
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 3:19 pm
Xenon is looking for puns where there aren't any, then complaining about them.
Re: Finding Out The Original Rayman 2
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 6:00 pm
Haha, my mistake. I thought you were referring to deep (strong) accent, deep voice tone.. you get it.
Re: Finding Out The Original Rayman 2
Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 3:42 pm
I was referring to the overall profoundness of your post.
If what you said was true, it would revolutionise the way we talk about...accents.
If what you said was true, it would revolutionise the way we talk about...accents.
Re: Finding Out The Original Rayman 2
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 10:51 am
Hehe, what next? Confrences on accents? Lectures about accents? Holidays celebrating certain accents?
The list goes on.
The list goes on.
Re: Finding Out The Original Rayman 2
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 5:47 pm
Perhaps we should return to the topic.
I combined the two EGM scans into one image. It looks better now:
I combined the two EGM scans into one image. It looks better now:
Re: Finding Out The Original Rayman 2
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 6:23 pm
Neat.
Dude, there are some people with accents I couldn't share a room with, never mind celebrating that they exist!Marley wrote:Holidays celebrating certain accents?
Re: Finding Out The Original Rayman 2
Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 3:00 pm
Whoa, never seen that before. I'm quite glad Rayman 2 became 3D...spiraldoor wrote:Perhaps we should return to the topic.
I combined the two EGM scans into one image. It looks better now: