Rayman Pirate-Community

< is out of understanding. Perhaps < should have used > instead?

< found a game Fifo might play

< is thinking of what to do after this. Start the walkthrough now or finish Super Mario Sunshine? Maybe < should take R4Y's advice and take time off from R3. < practically was on the game nonstop for days now.

< is going to bed.

Seriously, Fifo, you really need to stop worrying and use your head. < does not have the slightest clue what you said there.

< is currently pondering on a theory < has in TLOTLD2's secret area.

< will surely remember this moment. This is just something else.

He believes that the action of emphasizing the "<" is harsh and there is no logical explanation or reason for what he is saying there...

That's Fifo for ya. Definitely...

< agrees with that most definitely. < actually finds his reasoning to a lot of things both quite amusing and ridiculous.

< thinks it's funny how the atmosphere around here became so comical again thanks to a feckin' angle bracket and Fifo

God.

R4Y_ANC3L wrote:He believes that the action of emphasizing the "<" is harsh and there is no logical explanation or reason for what he is saying there...

< just thought that he was taking advantage of the fact that I like doing such things. What’s wrong about that!?

< sees that ^ has broken the rules.

Actually it's thanks to ^ that < has begun to have a desire to make guides, both written and video, though I haven't written any yet of mine own. < thinks that could change soon.

< thinks Fifo is angry.

The Jonster wrote:Actually it's thanks to ^ that < has begun to have a desire to make guides, both written and video, though I haven't written any yet of mine own. < thinks that could change soon.

<’s glad < could inspire you.

Also, I’m sorry for lashing out like that yesterday. That ‘I’ll be making the document this time’ sounded like you wanted to take away control from me **just** to annoy me. You know I don’t like it when stuff isn’t up to my standards (which I understand might be annoying to some).

Fifo wrote:

The Jonster wrote:Actually it's thanks to ^ that < has begun to have a desire to make guides, both written and video, though I haven't written any yet of mine own. < thinks that could change soon.

<’s glad < could inspire you.

Also, I’m sorry for lashing out like that yesterday. That ‘I’ll be making the document this time’ sounded like you wanted to take away control from me **just** to annoy me. You know I don’t like it when stuff isn’t up to my standards (which I understand might be annoying to some).

< says ^ is still breaking the rules

Now hang on, < didn't say that < was going to be making it <self, < said that < was going to create the document and then share it with everyone here so everyone can help edit it.

Also why did ^ have to bring up this 'take control away from me' ? Do ^ honestly think that ^ has any control over those documents anyway? < don't remember ^ helping to make this document aside from editing it so that our apparently mediocre and substandard additions can be even remotely acceptable to ^'s fucking perfectionist standards. Quit being so power-hungry and just accept the fact that not everybody can be like ^ and that's why < said that < or someone else should be in charge of it because knowing ^, ^ will mostly just stand there while we work hard to make this guide a success.

< wonders why ^^ wants "control" of a team effort and how exactly someone else leading a guide called theirs can "annoy" ^^? Maybe it could possibly annoy others if ^^ is in charge and they want to be? It's a team effort and if someone has "control" then it's not a fair team and nobody will join. Besides it was Jonster's idea for a Rayman 3 walkthrough in the first place anyway, ^^ was offering to help.

So the Rayman 1 guide Jonster and < done the work on wasn't up to ^^'s standards also then? Why does ^^ just proceed to be annoying every time < tries to be nice to ^^ seriously?

The Jonster wrote:Now hang on, < didn't say that < was going to be making it <self, < said that < was going to create the document <self and then share it with everyone here so everyone can help edit it.

Ah, <’s fault for misinterpreting it. Sorry.

The Jonster wrote:Also why do ^ keep bringing up this 'take control away from me'?

Because <’s not a fan of mess, complex stuff and such. < wants things to look perfect, y’know.

< wishes < could get over it.

But that's just the problem here, NOTHING In life is perfect. ^ needs to understand this and accept it otherwise nobody will help ^ with anything, < says. < also thinks that ^ should be mindful about what ^ should say on here because saying things like that will only get ^ in trouble with other people. What < is basically saying is, think before ^ say or do anything. Especially if ^ doesn't want anything like what happened with the RR Guide with ^^.

*sigh*

< doesn’t want to talk about this.

See, there ^ go again, giving that shit response of '< doesn't want to talk about this'! That's exactly the kind of thing that will piss people off!!! < isn't angry with ^, < is trying to help ^ by telling ^ what's wrong with ^'s pessimistic and narrow-minded thinking and ^ is just trying to run away from this situation again like ^ always do, though < isn't surprised by ^'s reaction, honestly. Seriously, give a minute and think about what ^ said. Surely ^ can do that at least?

< doesn’t know what the hell to say, dammit!!!

< fears that whatever < says may be judged.

< thinks ^ should start by avoiding saying things like that. If ^ doesn't know what to say then don't respond. Just give what < said a thought...please.

Fifo wrote: < fears that whatever < says may be judged.

And why was it necessary to write this? All < said was just to watch what ^ say. Seriously, that’s just an invitation for peopl to judge ^.