Re: Pictures of yourself!!!
Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 10:32 am
I liked both last photos.
MLII[2Random4U] wrote: I call him Kirby
Acarr's complaint was about a single use of the smiley by MGMK. I take it he posted more than one and Tobbe removed all but one of them from his post?Hunchman801 wrote:The main problem is not the use of the boon smiley itself but the its overuse.spiraldoor wrote:This would not happen if people stopped complaining about others' use of the boon smiley. It is a complex and ambiguous icon that can convey a wide range of emotions, and its use should not be discouraged. This is like Sean complaining about the 'indifferent' one.

We encourage use of written explanation. If you disapprove of something someone has said, it's far better to justify it with explained criticism than uselessly posting one emoticon.It is a complex and ambiguous icon that can convey a wide range of emotions, and its use should not be discouraged.
No, it wasn't.spiraldoor wrote:Acarr's complaint was about a single use of the smiley by MGMK.Hunchman801 wrote:The main problem is not the use of the boon smiley itself but the its overuse.spiraldoor wrote:This would not happen if people stopped complaining about others' use of the boon smiley. It is a complex and ambiguous icon that can convey a wide range of emotions, and its use should not be discouraged. This is like Sean complaining about the 'indifferent' one.
No, why the fuck would I do that?spiraldoor wrote:I take it he posted more than one and Tobbe removed all but one of them from his post?
Serza5 wrote:MLII[2Random4U] wrote: I call him Kirby![]()
You should paint him pink! : D
You could do only one layer.. Meh, that would look strange.MLII[2Random4U] wrote:Serza5 wrote:MLII[2Random4U] wrote: I call him Kirby![]()
You should paint him pink! : D
But then he wouldn't work. The light wouldn't go through the paint as strongly.
No? Then what was it about?Tobbe wrote:No, it wasn't.spiraldoor wrote:Acarr's complaint was about a single use of the smiley by MGMK.Hunchman801 wrote:The main problem is not the use of the boon smiley itself but the its overuse.spiraldoor wrote:This would not happen if people stopped complaining about others' use of the boon smiley. It is a complex and ambiguous icon that can convey a wide range of emotions, and its use should not be discouraged. This is like Sean complaining about the 'indifferent' one.
His post had "EDITED TO PLEASE TOBBE." written in it. You are a moderator, and can edit other people's posts. The reason I did not notice the "This post has been edited by PluMGMK" message was that it was in a similar font, size and colour as several consecutive lines of his signature, which I generally don't focus on.Tobbe wrote:No, why the fuck would I do that?spiraldoor wrote:I take it he posted more than one and Tobbe removed all but one of them from his post?
You in general (you can't see the real complaint btw).spiraldoor wrote:No? Then what was it about?Tobbe wrote:No, it wasn't.spiraldoor wrote:Acarr's complaint was about a single use of the smiley by MGMK.Hunchman801 wrote:The main problem is not the use of the boon smiley itself but the its overuse.spiraldoor wrote:This would not happen if people stopped complaining about others' use of the boon smiley. It is a complex and ambiguous icon that can convey a wide range of emotions, and its use should not be discouraged. This is like Sean complaining about the 'indifferent' one.
Yeah, but I don't abuse my powers.spiraldoor wrote:His post had "EDITED TO PLEASE TOBBE." written in it. You are a moderator, and can edit other people's posts.Tobbe wrote:No, why the fuck would I do that?spiraldoor wrote:I take it he posted more than one and Tobbe removed all but one of them from his post?
How could a complaint about the boon smiley's overuse be about me and not Plum when I hadn't even posted a boon smiley in this thread, and he just had?Tobbe wrote:You in general (you can't see the real complaint btw).spiraldoor wrote:No? Then what was it about?Tobbe wrote:No, it wasn't.spiraldoor wrote:Acarr's complaint was about a single use of the smiley by MGMK.Hunchman801 wrote:The main problem is not the use of the boon smiley itself but the its overuse.spiraldoor wrote:This would not happen if people stopped complaining about others' use of the boon smiley. It is a complex and ambiguous icon that can convey a wide range of emotions, and its use should not be discouraged. This is like Sean complaining about the 'indifferent' one.
That's irrelevant, all I did was tell you why I thought you edited it.Tobbe wrote:Yeah, but I don't abuse my powers.spiraldoor wrote:His post had "EDITED TO PLEASE TOBBE." written in it. You are a moderator, and can edit other people's posts.Tobbe wrote:No, why the fuck would I do that?spiraldoor wrote:I take it he posted more than one and Tobbe removed all but one of them from his post?
So that you and the rest of us would know that he was the one who edited your post?PluMGMK wrote:If Tobbe had changed it, why would he have put "to please Tobbe"?
