Rayman Raving Rabbids

[Hoodie74]

It seems that they are pretty awesome.....
...altough my damn stupid computer wont let me even go on it!

[Marley]

Is it me or am I the only person on this forum who has played the DS version of RRR and actually liked it?

[spiraldoor]

Hoodie: You are missing out on the best thing ever. I pity you.

Marley: You are in the minority.

[Haruka]

Is it me or am I the only person on this forum who has played the DS version of RRR and actually liked it?

You're not the only one.

[Acarr]

It was a pretty good game, but then I found it far too easy.

[Hunchman801]

I have never played it, is it a platformer too?

[Acarr]

Yeah, it's a platformer. Generally much better than the GBA version anyway. I'm surpried how little information about it is on the wiki. I might play through it again and write stuff about it.

[Haruka]

I think I still have my written review about the game when I finished it for the first time. Let me check it out later to see if something can be used to write about the game on the wiki.

[Darkkr]

Is it me or am I the only person on this forum who has played the DS version of RRR and actually liked it?

no i kinda liked

[Sabertooth]

You know, the one good thing about the absence of a Rayman 4 is that we can all refer to the series as "The Rayman Trilogy"

[PluMGMK]

I've been thinking the same thing.
Then we also have the R³ Trilogy.

[spiraldoor]

You know, the one good thing about the absence of a Rayman 4 is that we can all refer to the series as "The Rayman Trilogy"

Not really a worthy trade-off, that.

Then we also have the R³ Trilogy.

I have no idea what you mean.

[PluMGMK]

R³ = RRR. We have an RRR Trilogy.

I hope they don't make a Rabbids Trilogy. (RGH=1, Rabbids something else=2, Rabbids something else again=3)

[Sabertooth]

You know, the one good thing about the absence of a Rayman 4 is that we can all refer to the series as "The Rayman Trilogy"

Not really a worthy trade-off, that.

I'm trying to be optimistic here.

[Joshua822]

You know, the one good thing about the absence of a Rayman 4 is that we can all refer to the series as "The Rayman Trilogy"

Not really, the plots of the Rayman platformers where (officially) not connected to each other, and that's something I think needs to be the case in order to call three story's a trilogy ( even if they are about the same character ).

But, well, trying to be optimistic is nevertheless better than just being sad.

[spiraldoor]

A trilogy doesn't need to have its constituent works cosely related to each other to qualify as a trilogy. All it needs are three works set within the same continuity and in chronological order; conditions which are fulfilled by the Rayman series.

However I don't see the point in calling it a 'trilogy', as that's clearly not what it was intended to be.

[iHeckler9]

I suggest a seperate 'Kids Forum' which members such as Hoodie74 and iHeckler can be confined to until they become mature enough to make some contribution to the main forum.

I am a teenager. Mature is my middle name.

[PluMGMK]

Making posts like that doesn't help.

[spiraldoor]

I suggest a seperate 'Kids Forum' which members such as Hoodie74 and iHeckler can be confined to until they become mature enough to make some contribution to the main forum.

I am a teenager. Mature is my middle name.

Your reply to my three-month-old post is a perfect example of why your presence here displeases me so. If you intend to continue posting such useless bullshit as the above, please do so outside of the Rayman forum.

[Rsandee]

Why did he even searched in those pages anyway?