Rayman Pirate-Community

It seems that they are pretty awesome.....
...altough my damn stupid computer wont let me even go on it!

Is it me or am I the only person on this forum who has played the DS version of RRR and actually liked it?

Hoodie: You are missing out on the best thing ever. I pity you.

Marley: You are in the minority.

Marley wrote:Is it me or am I the only person on this forum who has played the DS version of RRR and actually liked it?

You're not the only one.

It was a pretty good game, but then I found it far too easy.

I have never played it, is it a platformer too?

Yeah, it's a platformer. Generally much better than the GBA version anyway. I'm surpried how little information about it is on the wiki. I might play through it again and write stuff about it.

I think I still have my written review about the game when I finished it for the first time. Let me check it out later to see if something can be used to write about the game on the wiki.

Marley wrote:Is it me or am I the only person on this forum who has played the DS version of RRR and actually liked it?

no i kinda liked

You know, the one good thing about the absence of a Rayman 4 is that we can all refer to the series as "The Rayman Trilogy"

I've been thinking the same thing.
Then we also have the R³ Trilogy.

Sabertooth1000000000 wrote:You know, the one good thing about the absence of a Rayman 4 is that we can all refer to the series as "The Rayman Trilogy"

Not really a worthy trade-off, that.

PluMGMK wrote:Then we also have the R³ Trilogy.

I have no idea what you mean.

R³ = RRR. We have an RRR Trilogy.

I hope they don't make a Rabbids Trilogy. (RGH=1, Rabbids something else=2, Rabbids something else again=3)

spiraldoor wrote:

Sabertooth1000000000 wrote:You know, the one good thing about the absence of a Rayman 4 is that we can all refer to the series as "The Rayman Trilogy"

Not really a worthy trade-off, that.

I'm trying to be optimistic here.

You know, the one good thing about the absence of a Rayman 4 is that we can all refer to the series as "The Rayman Trilogy"

Not really, the plots of the Rayman platformers where (officially) not connected to each other, and that's something I think needs to be the case in order to call three story's a trilogy ( even if they are about the same character ).

But, well, trying to be optimistic is nevertheless better than just being sad.

A trilogy doesn't need to have its constituent works cosely related to each other to qualify as a trilogy. All it needs are three works set within the same continuity and in chronological order; conditions which are fulfilled by the Rayman series.

However I don't see the point in calling it a 'trilogy', as that's clearly not what it was intended to be.

spiraldoor wrote:I suggest a seperate 'Kids Forum' which members such as Hoodie74 and iHeckler can be confined to until they become mature enough to make some contribution to the main forum.

I am a teenager. Mature is my middle name.

Making posts like that doesn't help.

iHeckler9 wrote:

spiraldoor wrote:I suggest a seperate 'Kids Forum' which members such as Hoodie74 and iHeckler can be confined to until they become mature enough to make some contribution to the main forum.

I am a teenager. Mature is my middle name.

Your reply to my three-month-old post is a perfect example of why your presence here displeases me so. If you intend to continue posting such useless bullshit as the above, please do so outside of the Rayman forum.

Why did he even searched in those pages anyway?