Page 2 of 2

Re: ~~*Font sig maker*~~

Posted: Sat Aug 21, 2004 8:22 am
by Gigaman
I mean big things. And thats big things :roll:

Re: ~~*Font sig maker*~~

Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2004 7:18 pm
by Matyuv
Somehow, I think TK understood that.




:/

Re: ~~*Font sig maker*~~

Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2004 4:04 pm
by Gigaman
Well, it don't happen anymore.

Re: ~~*Font sig maker*~~

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2004 2:14 pm
by Matyuv
A Conversational Network is the most personal of all four because introductions are made through actual communication instead of just a profile or a list of interests. The medium of Conversational Networks are weblogs or blogs, which is a journal published on the Internet that contains a mixture of what is happening in a person’s life as well as the latest web trends. Blogs are updated regularly and can be maintained even by people with little technical knowledge through the use of a program or script. What happens is that a person read someone’s blog, and then gets a general idea of the author based on what he or she writes in the blog. One can even participate in someone’s blog by adding comments on their entries. Bloggers—those who own and write in blogs—have the choice to ignore their readers or reciprocate by reading and placing comments on the blogs of their readers. Then they can develop a more personal relationship through e-mails, chat, or an eyeball, a term used for people from the Internet who meet face-to-face for the first time.

Re: ~~*Font sig maker*~~

Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 5:47 pm
by th3()ne
There were and continue to be, several challenges to the development of this course, not least of them the electronic component. I developed this course as an independent, adjunct instructor in a matter of a few months, left largely to my own devices. There were cross-platform issues to deal with; the need to quickly design an application that would be easy to use and reliable; software distribution and assignment submission issues; and the electronic equivalent of paperwork in order to keep track of student progress, grading, etc. Nevertheless, students have responded to the course generally favourably. I was pleased upon reviewing course evaluations for the spring term that many students singled out the helpfulness of the meaning/value paradigm in increasing their understanding of the course material.

Re: ~~*Font sig maker*~~

Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 7:58 pm
by th3()ne
c00l

Re: ~~*Font sig maker*~~

Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 10:20 pm
by supmachin
Sign maker : signz.free.fr : french but good...

Re: ~~*Font sig maker*~~

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 9:09 am
by th3()ne
that sucks

Re: ~~*Font sig maker*~~

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 2:44 pm
by supmachin
You don't comes, so don't speak about this?
If you're normal, test it's really good !

Re: ~~*Font sig maker*~~

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 5:30 pm
by th3()ne
a good way to increase post count frencchie.

Re: ~~*Font sig maker*~~

Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 2:02 pm
by supmachin
I'm not a frenchie, i'm just a Covenant and I invaded your poor wretch planet, landers!
:twisted:

Re: ~~*Font sig maker*~~

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 3:36 pm
by th3()ne
Please don't spam.

Re: ~~*Font sig maker*~~

Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2006 12:01 am
by Hunchman801
You had better ways to increase your postcount.

Re: ~~*Font sig maker*~~

Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2006 9:50 am
by th3()ne
Yeah, such as this post...

Re: ~~*Font sig maker*~~

Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2006 12:34 pm
by Hunchman801
Exactly, if spam was not punished, it would be a great way to increase postcounts.

Re: ~~*Font sig maker*~~

Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2006 2:00 pm
by Matyuv
I agree.

Re: ~~*Font sig maker*~~

Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2006 5:56 pm
by Hunchman801
Here we go, let us subtract you about 10000 Tings :D

Re: ~~*Font sig maker*~~

Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2006 9:01 pm
by Matyuv
WHAT THE FUCK?

Re: ~~*Font sig maker*~~

Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2006 9:37 pm
by th3()ne
lol?

Re: ~~*Font sig maker*~~

Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2006 9:13 am
by Matyuv
When you save an HTML file, you can use either the .htm or the .html extension. We have used .htm in our examples. It might be a bad habit inherited from the past when some of the commonly used software only allowed three letter extensions.

With newer software we think it will be perfectly safe to use .html.