For everything not related to either Rayman or Pirate-Community.
GrandKittymus
Posts: 253 Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2013 11:36 pm
Location: Where I shouldn't be. Up to no good once again.
Contact:
Tings: 1210
Post
by GrandKittymus » Wed Mar 06, 2013 1:27 am
Adsolution wrote: I didn't realise how low-quality the production was until I just saw that clip again. Even for an independent film, I'm sure they could have rendered out something higher quality than that.
Nonetheless though, a good movie.
I'm all with ya there. It's been ages since I've seen it, so when I found this, I was like, "Oh my. They've done some improvement with graphics, haven't they?"
And yes. A good movie indeed. That's one I'm not throwing off my shelf.
Minor-T5
Posts: 983 Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 10:59 pm
Location: United States, Florida
Tings: 5654
Post
by Minor-T5 » Wed Mar 06, 2013 1:56 am
I absolutely loved this movie!
GrandKittymus
Posts: 253 Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2013 11:36 pm
Location: Where I shouldn't be. Up to no good once again.
Contact:
Tings: 1210
Post
by GrandKittymus » Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:22 am
Minor-T5 wrote: I absolutely loved this movie!
Same here man. Most people who see this movie end up loving this movie. XD
Minor-T5
Posts: 983 Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 10:59 pm
Location: United States, Florida
Tings: 5654
Post
by Minor-T5 » Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:32 am
You are very right!
The second one just didn't seem as good as the first one. It was okay, out of 5 stars, I would give it a 3.
GrandKittymus
Posts: 253 Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2013 11:36 pm
Location: Where I shouldn't be. Up to no good once again.
Contact:
Tings: 1210
Post
by GrandKittymus » Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:41 am
Minor-T5 wrote: You are very right!
The second one just didn't seem as good as the first one. It was okay, out of 5 stars, I would give it a 3.
I fully agree with you there. Original rules. Second one could have done better.
Minor-T5
Posts: 983 Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 10:59 pm
Location: United States, Florida
Tings: 5654
Post
by Minor-T5 » Wed Mar 06, 2013 3:01 am
And I hate the characters redesigns
.
GrandKittymus
Posts: 253 Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2013 11:36 pm
Location: Where I shouldn't be. Up to no good once again.
Contact:
Tings: 1210
Post
by GrandKittymus » Wed Mar 06, 2013 4:11 am
Minor-T5 wrote: And I hate the characters redesigns
.
Same here. Yeesh. You can obviously tell on that movie they tried WAY too hard. X(
Minor-T5
Posts: 983 Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 10:59 pm
Location: United States, Florida
Tings: 5654
Post
by Minor-T5 » Wed Mar 06, 2013 4:12 am
Sometimes sequels are only good once or twice, take Spider-Man 3 for example, that movie was BAD, and the others were great.
Adsolution
Posts: 22233 Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 4:55 pm
Contact:
Tings: 110541
Post
by Adsolution » Wed Mar 06, 2013 10:52 am
I liked Spider-Man 3 actually. There were a lot of silly parts, but I thought that some of the greatest moments in the trilogy were from it.
I didn't even have that much of a problem with emo-Toby.
Minor-T5
Posts: 983 Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 10:59 pm
Location: United States, Florida
Tings: 5654
Post
by Minor-T5 » Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:48 pm
It was only okay. It was only good to the Sandman fight, then the movie just got stupid. The Amazing Spider-Man was so much better than the older ones.
Adsolution
Posts: 22233 Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 4:55 pm
Contact:
Tings: 110541
Post
by Adsolution » Wed Mar 06, 2013 7:34 pm
That point I do agree on. It was one of my favourite movies of the year.
Rulez
Posts: 14881 Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 4:38 pm
Location: Poland
Contact:
Tings: 5745
Post
by Rulez » Wed Mar 06, 2013 7:40 pm
Hoodwinked is quite a bit slightly worse than I remember.
Minor-T5
Posts: 983 Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 10:59 pm
Location: United States, Florida
Tings: 5654
Post
by Minor-T5 » Wed Mar 06, 2013 7:45 pm
One of my favorite characters from the move was the Lumberjack. The movie wouldn't be the same without him.
Rulez
Posts: 14881 Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 4:38 pm
Location: Poland
Contact:
Tings: 5745
Post
by Rulez » Wed Mar 06, 2013 7:52 pm
Minor-T5 wrote: One of my favorite characters from the move was the Lumberjack. The movie wouldn't be the same without him.
Obviously. If you were to remove any character from any movie ever, the movie would in no way be the same. Technically.
Minor-T5
Posts: 983 Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 10:59 pm
Location: United States, Florida
Tings: 5654
Post
by Minor-T5 » Wed Mar 06, 2013 7:59 pm
Rulez wrote: Obviously. If you were to remove any character from any movie ever, the movie would in no way be the same. Technically.
I know, but if they took Lumberjack guy out, the movie wouldn't be good at all.
Rulez
Posts: 14881 Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 4:38 pm
Location: Poland
Contact:
Tings: 5745
Post
by Rulez » Wed Mar 06, 2013 8:06 pm
If a single character makes a movie good for you, you must b
Minor-T5
Posts: 983 Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 10:59 pm
Location: United States, Florida
Tings: 5654
Post
by Minor-T5 » Wed Mar 06, 2013 8:15 pm
Did you finish that sentence?
Rulez
Posts: 14881 Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 4:38 pm
Location: Poland
Contact:
Tings: 5745
Post
by Rulez » Wed Mar 06, 2013 8:16 pm
In a way, yes. It's not exactly worth finishing, considering your opinion on what makes a movie good.
Minor-T5
Posts: 983 Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 10:59 pm
Location: United States, Florida
Tings: 5654
Post
by Minor-T5 » Wed Mar 06, 2013 8:20 pm
You're not getting what I'm trying to say.
Lets just drop this conversation, okay?
Rulez
Posts: 14881 Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 4:38 pm
Location: Poland
Contact:
Tings: 5745
Post
by Rulez » Wed Mar 06, 2013 9:02 pm
You're not getting what I'm trying to say.