Re: Anti-British!!!!
Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2011 9:37 pm
History lies to us!Xenon wrote:Always resort to history
History lies to us!Xenon wrote:Always resort to history
Stfu u ignorant bastardsRayFan9876 wrote:History lies to us!Xenon wrote:Always resort to history
Des, you're about as resourceful as a toilet.DesLife wrote:Stfu u ignorant bastardsRayFan9876 wrote:History lies to us!Xenon wrote:Always resort to history
Nah you just can't handle the truth because no matter how you look at it the England is always the bad guy.RayFan9876 wrote:History lies to us!Xenon wrote:Always resort to history
That's a pretty one-sided "fact".spiraldoor wrote:You fail at history. The English oppressed us for eight hundred years and only agreed to fuck off when we gave them a large chunk of our country. Fact.RayFan9876 wrote:No, Scots.spiraldoor wrote:Pointing guns at my head would actually be much more of an English thing to do. The dirty oppressive bastards.RayFan9876 wrote:Where do you live? Just curious because wherever it is there must be dirty Scottish pulling guns at your head.spiraldoor wrote:The Scottish are a lot better than the English. Fact.
I got nothin' but I'm proud to be English!Serza5 wrote:Nah you just can't handle the truth because no matter how you look at it the England is always the bad guy.RayFan9876 wrote:History lies to us!Xenon wrote:Always resort to history
I'd like to see you prove historically that Scots are bastards.Xenon wrote:More groundless allegations
That is very true indeed.Xenon wrote:Historical arguments are always weak. A country's culture can never be defined through the actions of individual dictators.
Since when was this about the culture alone? I was talking about the countries as a whole.Xenon wrote:Historical arguments are always weak. A country's culture can never be defined through the actions of individual dictators.
Tell that to the million Irish people who were starved to death by the English during the Famine.RayFan9876 wrote:History lies to us!Xenon wrote:Always resort to history
Go away Plum, you meek traitor.PluMGMK wrote:That's a pretty one-sided "fact".
No, British refers to the people not the country. Notice the title of the thread.Serza5 wrote:Since when was this about the culture alone? I was talking about the countries as a whole.Xenon wrote:Historical arguments are always weak. A country's culture can never be defined through the actions of individual dictators.
But I thought you were insulting British people...?Serza5 wrote:Since when was this about the culture alone? I was talking about the countries as a whole.Xenon wrote:Historical arguments are always weak. A country's culture can never be defined through the actions of individual dictators.
Plum, I am disappoint.spiraldoor wrote:Go away Plum, you meek traitor.PluMGMK wrote:That's a pretty one-sided "fact".
The people and their culture define one another. You cannot separate them.Xenon wrote:But I thought you were insulting British people...?Serza5 wrote:Since when was this about the culture alone? I was talking about the countries as a whole.Xenon wrote:Historical arguments are always weak. A country's culture can never be defined through the actions of individual dictators.
I love you all, your so horriblePluMGMK wrote:That is grossly unfair.Xenon wrote:So you're allowed to say Brits suck while I'm not allowed to say Scots suck, just because you're sensitive?
Even so, what happens in History effects what they become now, if that weren't the case Scotland and England won't still be brutal rivals (although it's not as extreme now as it was then the links are still there). Culture is simply something that history creates, you cannot make cake without the flour.Xenon wrote:But I thought you were insulting British people...?Serza5 wrote:Since when was this about the culture alone? I was talking about the countries as a whole.Xenon wrote:Historical arguments are always weak. A country's culture can never be defined through the actions of individual dictators.