Rayman Pirate-Community

Serza5 wrote:I do not car if that plush is Hitler I want it.

A car is an object Serza.

RayFan9876 wrote:Excuse me?

That's a gift for spiral !

DesLife wrote:

RayFan9876 wrote:Excuse me?

That's a gift for spiral !

Ah.

DesLife wrote:

RayFan9876 wrote:Excuse me?

That's a gift for spiral !

Can Serza have one too pretty please?

Serza5 wrote:

DesLife wrote:

RayFan9876 wrote:Excuse me?

That's a gift for spiral !

Can Serza have one too pretty please?

Me too!

That does not mean that the history has been completely scrubed clean.

Noone is saying England's history is glistening clean. The point is that not every historical event is subject to the shaping of a country's culture. If you can't accept that then there is no use in discussing this further

Des is going to need loads more plushies now

spiraldoor wrote:Your bare-faced denial of the Famine shows that you have not learned a single thing from the crimes of your ancestors. What is your opinion regarding those who still deny the Jewish Holocaust? Your remarks place you on the same moral ground as them.

I happen to say some sources overesimate number of killed Jews. What the heck does it do in Anti-British topic?
And why are some of you Anti-British? No the heck this time, I wanna know.

Xenon wrote:

That does not mean that the history has been completely scrubed clean.

Noone is saying England's history is glistening clean. The point is that not every historical event is subject to the shaping of a country's culture. If you can't accept that then there is no use in discussing this further

No one seems to understand this.

Xenon wrote:

That does not mean that the history has been completely scrubed clean.

Noone is saying England's history is glistening clean. The point is that not every historical event is subject to the shaping of a country's culture. If you can't accept that then there is no use in discussing this further

I understand that and not saying that as well but you were saying that they aren't linked together which is what I opposed to, while they don't link together much that doesn't mean they don't link at all.

Serza5 wrote:

Xenon wrote:

That does not mean that the history has been completely scrubed clean.

Noone is saying England's history is glistening clean. The point is that not every historical event is subject to the shaping of a country's culture. If you can't accept that then there is no use in discussing this further

I understand that and not saying that as well but you were saying that they aren't linked together which is what I opposed to, while they don't link together much that doesn't mean they don't link at all.

But with some people it links very little.

RayFan9876 wrote:

spiraldoor wrote:

RayFan9876 wrote:

spiraldoor wrote:

RayFan9876 wrote:

Serza5 wrote:That makes no sense. Historical events are part of history, these events influence how people view the history and thus affecting their culture.

It depends how you were brought up an educated. If you were brought up in a Liberal family I doubt that history would matter much.

Being ‘liberal’ does not absolve one of past crimes.

It doesn't absolve past crimes of your country, but it means you learn from your culture's past mistakes, making negative history not as relevant to you.

Your bare-faced denial of the Famine shows that you have not learned a single thing from the crimes of your ancestors. What is your opinion regarding those who still deny the Jewish Holocaust? Your remarks place you on the same moral ground as them.

Lol Spiral you big dork I'm not denying anything, as I myself had nothing to do with the famine. An individual doesn't make up a whole country you butt-bar-buddy.

I don’t see why I should accept your backpedalling since you have specifically stated that ‘history lies’ when confronted with the fact of the Famine which your ancestors caused. You and your attitude are indicative of the general moral corruption of the English nation as a whole. Dirty English bastards!

Recommended reading

spiraldoor wrote:

RayFan9876 wrote:

spiraldoor wrote:

RayFan9876 wrote:

spiraldoor wrote:

RayFan9876 wrote:

Serza5 wrote:That makes no sense. Historical events are part of history, these events influence how people view the history and thus affecting their culture.

It depends how you were brought up an educated. If you were brought up in a Liberal family I doubt that history would matter much.

Being ‘liberal’ does not absolve one of past crimes.

It doesn't absolve past crimes of your country, but it means you learn from your culture's past mistakes, making negative history not as relevant to you.

Your bare-faced denial of the Famine shows that you have not learned a single thing from the crimes of your ancestors. What is your opinion regarding those who still deny the Jewish Holocaust? Your remarks place you on the same moral ground as them.

Lol Spiral you big dork I'm not denying anything, as I myself had nothing to do with the famine. An individual doesn't make up a whole country you butt-bar-buddy.

I don’t see why I should accept your backpedalling since you have specifically stated that ‘history lies’ when confronted with the fact of the Famine which your ancestors caused. You and your attitude are indicative of the general moral corruption of the English nation as a whole. Dirty English bastards!

Recommended reading

I said that before we got serious you funny guy.

Hitler plushies for everybody !

RayFan9876 wrote:

Serza5 wrote:

Xenon wrote:

That does not mean that the history has been completely scrubed clean.

Noone is saying England's history is glistening clean. The point is that not every historical event is subject to the shaping of a country's culture. If you can't accept that then there is no use in discussing this further

I understand that and not saying that as well but you were saying that they aren't linked together which is what I opposed to, while they don't link together much that doesn't mean they don't link at all.

But with some people it links very little.

That's not what i'm opposing against, I know there are stonger ilinks in some cases than others but i'm opposing against it having very little or no link at all.

DesLife wrote:Hitler plushies for everybody !

It's funny because my mom's side opa (grandpa) was brothers with one of Hitler's high-ranking assistants. However my opa was the complete opposite and freed a bunch of people. That's right, I got stories.

RayFan9876 wrote:

DesLife wrote:Hitler plushies for everybody !

It's funny because my mom's side opa (grandpa) was brothers with one of Hitler's high-ranking assistants. However my opa was the complete opposite and freed a bunch of people. That's right, I got stories.

I beleive my Ukraine Granddad served Hitler during the war, and ended up in a prison camp up in Haddington (Town near me) when it ended, when he was released he met my gran.

Serza5 wrote:

Xenon wrote:

That does not mean that the history has been completely scrubed clean.

Noone is saying England's history is glistening clean. The point is that not every historical event is subject to the shaping of a country's culture. If you can't accept that then there is no use in discussing this further

I understand that and not saying that as well but you were saying that they aren't linked together which is what I opposed to, while they don't link together much that doesn't mean they don't link at all.

I simply pointed out the difference betwen history and historical events. I never said there was no link; I just said there is a huge difference.

Serza5 wrote:

RayFan9876 wrote:

DesLife wrote:Hitler plushies for everybody !

It's funny because my mom's side opa (grandpa) was brothers with one of Hitler's high-ranking assistants. However my opa was the complete opposite and freed a bunch of people. That's right, I got stories.

I beleive my Ukraine Granddad served Hitler during the war, and ended up in a prison camp up in Haddington (Town near me) when it ended, when he was released he met my gran.

Aw

FOUR MINUTE BREAK.