Rayman Pirate-Community

WARNING! The following statement is sarcastic. I don't like Lars Ulrich at all. In fact, I think he's an asshole.

Current list:
2. - 10. Irrelevant

1. Lars Ulrich (Guitar Hero: Metallica)

El Dango wrote:

Xenon wrote:Guys, we seem to have a sudden gush of game threads being dumped on us - it would be much better for everyone if they were pigeonholed into this one mother topic. Cheers!

This is really just a top 10 topic, not a general game discussion topic. But i agree about the "sub-sub-sub forum" thingie.

A normal subforum would be better. It could go next to the Guests forum.

But it's not just a games topic in general, it's a topic which asks what games people are currently playing.

It merits as a topic where people can discuss games... this is good enough.

I think there should be a games section. Discussing every single game in one topic makes the topic quite unreadable and doesn't leave room for several discussions at the same time.

We need a games subforum. All game threads could be unlocked and moved there. This thread, and the "What games are you currently playing?" thread, could be stickied.

A lot of good boards have a Games forum somwhere. I honestly don't see what the problem is.

Maybe it's something worth bringing up, though to be honest I really can't see the point in a subforum dedicated to hundreds of game topics. I mean, what's wrong with, for example, creating a sticky 'Games' topic?

Xenon wrote:Maybe it's something worth bringing up, though to be honest I really can't see the point in a subforum dedicated to hundreds of game topics. I mean, what's wrong with, for example, creating a sticky 'Games' topic?

Umm...hundreds of discussions going on at the same time in the same thread?

Uh, wait a sec...

Spyrodifusion wrote:...................

Spam.

spiraldoor wrote:

Xenon wrote:Maybe it's something worth bringing up, though to be honest I really can't see the point in a subforum dedicated to hundreds of game topics. I mean, what's wrong with, for example, creating a sticky 'Games' topic?

Umm...hundreds of discussions going on at the same time in the same thread?

Wouldn't be much different from several other sticky threads we have.

So if I want to have a game discussion, you're saying I have to interrupt someone else's game discussion?

WHY isn't there a subforum?! Everyone except you thinks it's a good idea! Where is Hunch? He seems to have stopped coming online recently.

Also, is the PC or PSX version of Abe's Exoddus better?

Xenon wrote:It merits as a topic where people can discuss games... this is good enough.

So let's make only one topic about Rayman.

Not really, since Rayman is the primary element of this forum.

Anyway, I don't know why you're all getting hissy with me - I don't have powers to create subforums. This is something you'll have to take up with Hunch.

We simply want to change your opinion, that's all.

I just don't see the point. Segregating a few old forgotten games topics into a subforum (which won't get many posts) seems like a worthless idea.

And look at the activity. Most game topics don't even reach 20 posts.

You're saved by word "most".

Xenon wrote:And look at the activity. Most game topics don't even reach 20 posts.

That's because you lock them. And don't act like all non-game topics reach 20 posts...they don't.

Xenon wrote:Not really, since Rayman is the primary element of this forum.

And Rayman is...a game. Therefore, those with enough interest in Rayman to become members of a Rayman forum are...gamers. We are all gamers here. Naturally, we would like to be allowed to talk about games, and not just have one thread for all the thousands of games we've played.

I also think there should be a Spam subforum, where pointless and stupid threads could be moved after they've been locked. And nobody would be able to post there. I'm sick of looking at a bunch of locked threads every single time I visit this place. But I would rather talk about the games forum first.