Page 121 of 467

Re: Rayman 3

Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 11:55 pm
by spiraldoor
I need some help. I want to make a list of all the minigames in Rayman 3, in their correct order. Here they are:

2D Madness
Racket Jump
Crush
Razoff Circus
Sentinel
Missile Command
Balloons
Special Invaders
Commando
2D Nightmare

But I’m not sure where Mad Trax and Wheelis go, and there might be another one or two I’ve forgotten.

Re: Rayman 3

Posted: Sun Nov 21, 2010 12:22 am
by Danone
hm?, I dont remember ''2D Nightmare''

Re: Rayman 3

Posted: Sun Nov 21, 2010 1:24 pm
by Haruka
spiraldoor wrote:I need some help. I want to make a list of all the minigames in Rayman 3, in their correct order. Here they are:

2D Madness
Racket Jump
Crush
Razoff Circus
Sentinel
Missile Command
Balloons
Special Invaders
Commando
2D Nightmare

But I’m not sure where Mad Trax and Wheelis go, and there might be another one or two I’ve forgotten.
I can tell you that the PC ones are correct.

... I need to get Rayman 3 for GBA someday.

Re: Rayman 3

Posted: Fri Nov 26, 2010 2:45 pm
by Hedgehog673
I remember I had the Xbox version, and unlocked all the mini games. I sold after some time, and now I've bought it again for Gamecube. Got disappointed when I figured that you needed the GBA version of Rayman 3 to play 2D Madness :(

Re: Rayman 3

Posted: Fri Nov 26, 2010 3:24 pm
by Danone
how can I get the ''2D Nightmare''?

Re: Rayman 3

Posted: Fri Nov 26, 2010 5:55 pm
by spiraldoor
Danonanobadray327 wrote:how can I get the ''2D Nightmare''?
No one knows.

Re: Rayman 3

Posted: Fri Nov 26, 2010 6:05 pm
by Jewish Candy
Danonanobadray327 wrote:how can I get the ''2D Nightmare''?
Some say you have to inadvertently divide by zero while eating a croissant. Only one way to find out!

Re: Rayman 3

Posted: Fri Nov 26, 2010 6:40 pm
by DesLife
Don't ever do that. That would unravel the very fabric of the space-time continuum and destroy the entire universe !

Re: Rayman 3

Posted: Fri Nov 26, 2010 6:41 pm
by Jewish Candy
It would also increase my bra size. :mrgreen: Which makes up for everything.

Re: Rayman 3

Posted: Fri Nov 26, 2010 7:02 pm
by DesLife
I strongly disagree here. Plus, you might get even shorter instead.

Re: Rayman 3

Posted: Fri Nov 26, 2010 7:07 pm
by Jewish Candy
To be honest, me shrinking would defy all laws of nat--



Oh yeah. :oops2:

Re: Rayman 3

Posted: Fri Nov 26, 2010 7:31 pm
by DesLife
So don't divide by zero.

Re: Rayman 3

Posted: Fri Nov 26, 2010 11:22 pm
by spiraldoor
On a related note, I seem to have grown taller in the last few weeks. Maybe it’s because of my birthday or something.

Re: Rayman 3

Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 11:32 pm
by Rsandee
DesLife wrote:So don't divide by zero.
Take the root of a negative number instead.

Re: Rayman 3

Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 11:34 pm
by DesLife
There's no problem with taking the root of a negative number. It's just a common complex number.

Re: Rayman 3

Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 11:43 pm
by Jewish Candy
I think that, one day, people WILL find a way to divide by zero successfully - in a similar fashion to complex numbers, which no doubt would have seemed impossible to the average caveman. And when we do so, everyone (even the men) will have enormous breasts, technology will accelerate to the point that a singularity is a ridiculous concept, and equality, acceptance and solidarity will at last reign throughout humankind. :mrgreen: I have a dream indeed.

Re: Rayman 3

Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 11:57 pm
by DesLife
This is impossible. What is a division ? To divide by x is to multiply by x's multiplicative inverse, x^-1. Here's the definition of the multiplicative inverse of x : x*x^-1=1. But 0*x=1 can't be solved : this x, which would be zero's multiplicative inverse, doesn't exist. Which means you can't multiply by zero's multiplicative inverse, which means you can't divide by zero.

Re: Rayman 3

Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 12:20 am
by Jewish Candy
DesLife wrote:Zero's multiplicative inverse doesn't exist.
How narrow-minded of you. 0^-1=x= the multiplicative inverse of nothing, correct?
If we assume from our petty human perspective that x is thus 0 or nothing, we get "nothing = something", or 0x0=1, 0=1. This doesn't downgrade 'something'ness, it simply shows that it is equal in value to nothingness, showing that all things comprehensible and incomprehensible are of equal value, resulting in worldwide nirvana and massive moobs.
You know I'm just messin' with you in order to fulfil my 'DD-chested men' fantasy. :wink:

Re: Rayman 3

Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 12:23 am
by DesLife
Messing with me won't make your breasts bigger. :mrgreen:

Re: Rayman 3

Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 12:24 am
by Jewish Candy
Messing with the cosmic balance of existence and void(ness?) just might, though. :mryellow: