Rayman Pirate-Community

RayFan9876 wrote:The bouncing animation on the dragon at the end was awful. However, I'll give the trailer credit for including the PEGI rating dialogue at the beginning, it can make any mediocre trailer look half decent.

You just came to my house, ate my brain, stole my thoughts and then gave me back whatever was left of it when you were done.

I don't like trailers that don't show you anything concerning the actual gameplay or at least anything that's remotely related. What can you expect from this game after seeing this trailer? Will it be a sidescroller, 3D, arena, FPS, RTS, dress-'em-up...? For all I know it's a cooking show with a cook with an eccentric outfit and his pet dragon functioning as his firelighter.

Absolutely. I really have nothing to make of this trailer, and I feel a cent of pity for those who are swindled into buying it from that before even seeing any gameplay.

RayFan9876 wrote:Absolutely. I really have nothing to make of this trailer, and I feel a cent of pity for those who are swindled into buying it from that before even seeing any gameplay.

My original thought was fighting game. Then I looked at some screenshots and was like "Hey this is something I would like" and decided that I was probably gonna get it.

If I want a game, It will be through studying trailers, screenshots and most importantly, gameplay.
If a game doesn't have any gameplay shown until release, then I'd follow some playthroughs just to see what it's like.

Shrooblord wrote:

RayFan9876 wrote:The bouncing animation on the dragon at the end was awful. However, I'll give the trailer credit for including the PEGI rating dialogue at the beginning, it can make any mediocre trailer look half decent.

You just came to my house, ate my brain, stole my thoughts and then gave me back whatever was left of it when you were done.

+1

I do need to share the same point of view. It is amazing how the trailer doesn't show gameplay at all, Ubisoft must be with fear of something. To be honest I expect everything since I played RRTiT and read reviews of RRA&K.

Bionichute wrote:My original thought was fighting game. Then I looked at some screenshots and was like "Hey this is something I would like" and decided that I was probably gonna get it.

And what if it turns out to be something completely different than you expect?

Sure you can watch some gameplay to see what it's like before buying it, but it's the principle: a company should be able to make a coherent trailer that isn't just random unrelated nonsense. This is probably one of the most unrelated, nonsensical trailers to a game I've seen in a very long time.

RayFan9876 wrote:

Bionichute wrote:My original thought was fighting game. Then I looked at some screenshots and was like "Hey this is something I would like" and decided that I was probably gonna get it.

And what if it turns out to be something completely different than you expect?

It's a Pokemon styled RPG with minigames. My favorite part of Rabbids 2 was the costumes, and my favorite part of Pokemon is collecting the Pokemon. This appeals to me greatly.

Bionichute wrote:My favorite part of Rabbids 2 was the costumes

Can you help me get this dent out of my skull? I ran into a pole on purpose.

RayFan9876 wrote:

Bionichute wrote:My favorite part of Rabbids 2 was the costumes

Can you help me get this dent out of my skull? I ran into a pole on purpose.

Don't hate people because they have different opinions, man.

Bionichute wrote:

RayFan9876 wrote:

Bionichute wrote:My favorite part of Rabbids 2 was the costumes

Can you help me get this dent out of my skull? I ran into a pole on purpose.

Don't hate people because they have different opinions, man.

I don't hate you, and I'm not arguing with you, I'm just a bit vocal.

Then in his point of view, Raving Rabbids: Travel in Time is an excellent game.

Haruka wrote:Then in his point of view, Raving Rabbids: Travel in Time is an excellent game.

I can't judge that because I've never played it.

I have played RRR1 and my point of view changed little.
I do not hate Rabbids-I think they're funny and amusing. But making Rayman games into party was the worst idea which ever came.
Michel Ancel didn't want to make that game like this...

It was mostly because of Nintendo Power's pressure to make an interview about the game.

LKPettin2 wrote:I have played RRR1 and my point of view changed little.
I do not hate Rabbids-I think they're funny and amusing. But making Rayman games into party was the worst idea which ever came.
Michel Ancel didn't want to make that game like this...

I agree.
EDIT: with EVERYTHING you said.

You agree with a lot, don't you?

Woah... the first bouncing effect was pretty decent... the rest of them were just plain awful... like... they don't get deep enough to bounce like that, and they move too slow during the impact... what the hell happened to the gravity?

sergiomonty wrote:Woah... the first bouncing effect was pretty decent... the rest of them were just plain awful... like... they don't get deep enough to bounce like that, and they move too slow during the impact... what the hell happened to the gravity?

Also the way they richochet was a bit interesting.

Hang about what are we talking about here? 'Cause some minigames in RRR1 were more annoying than others like Bunnies are slow to react...

I wouldn't say Bunnies are slow to React is annoying...it's just hard.