Page 16 of 55

Re: Of the extermination of furfags

Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 1:51 pm
by MLII
You know what guys? Screw this I agree with IAB.

Now, I completely believe most of this topic was meant to be a joke. I mean, RayFan isn't serious, Spiraldoor can't be serious (not about the furry thing anyway), and I'm pretty sure no-one else is being serious either- except for Comment.

While you guys may think that this is a joke, and so do I actually, I'm pretty sure Comment actually created this topic to either A be a troll and cause lots of outcry (Nice try dude, but it didn't work. Maybe you should leave that stuff to your hacker boyfriend xD) or B to be deadly serious. (Again, didn't work, cus people thought it was funny.)

I personally think this topic has no value on PC and if it had been anyone else starting it, it would've been locked on the first day. But, hey, if you guys want to leave it open I have no problem with that and can't really have one anyway.

For the record, that religion post of IABs up there was probably completely sarcastic from the "Does that mean they're Christian" part downwards. Did nobody else get that? I thought it was obvious.

Okay milly out

EDIT: Why am I CONSTANTLY STARTING NEW PAGES. @^@

Re: Of the extermination of furfags

Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 2:11 pm
by spiraldoor
MLII wrote:You know what guys? Screw this I agree with IAB.

Now, I completely believe most of this topic was meant to be a joke. I mean, RayFan isn't serious, Spiraldoor can't be serious (not about the furry thing anyway),
You seem awfully certain of that.
MLII wrote:While you guys may think that this is a joke, and so do I actually, I'm pretty sure Comment actually created this topic to either A be a troll and cause lots of outcry (Nice try dude, but it didn't work. Maybe you should leave that stuff to your hacker boyfriend xD) or B to be deadly serious. (Again, didn't work, cus people thought it was funny.)
Goodbye, MLII. It’s been nice knowing you.
MLII wrote:For the record, that religion post of IABs up there was probably completely sarcastic from the "Does that mean they're Christian" part downwards. Did nobody else get that? I thought it was obvious.
Even if he was, that wouldn’t mean his post was appropriate or acceptable. Or that he’s not a lunatic.

Re: Of the extermination of furfags

Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 3:37 pm
by Adsolution
MLII wrote:to either A be a troll
This isn't serious.
MLII wrote:For the record, that religion post of IABs up there was probably completely sarcastic from the "Does that mean they're Christian" part downwards. Did nobody else get that? I thought it was obvious.
This is serious.

Said opposing plot thickens.

Re: Of the extermination of furfags

Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 6:39 pm
by Rsandee
I personally think this topic has no value on PC and if it had been anyone else starting it, it would've been locked on the first day.
Implying any other topic here on RPC has value.

Re: Of the extermination of furfags

Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 6:52 pm
by MLII
spiraldoor wrote:
MLII wrote:You know what guys? Screw this I agree with IAB.

Now, I completely believe most of this topic was meant to be a joke. I mean, RayFan isn't serious, Spiraldoor can't be serious (not about the furry thing anyway),
You seem awfully certain of that.
Well posts like
spiraldoor wrote:I have no interest in leftist nonsense such as ‘tolerance’ or ‘open-mindedness’.

can't be real.

spiraldoor wrote:
MLII wrote:For the record, that religion post of IABs up there was probably completely sarcastic from the "Does that mean they're Christian" part downwards. Did nobody else get that? I thought it was obvious.
Even if he was, that wouldn’t mean his post was appropriate or acceptable. Or that he’s not a lunatic.
Did I say that it was? No. Did I say that it wasn't? No. I was just pointing out that so many of you seemed to think he was being serious (as opposed to sarcastic).
RayFan9876 wrote:
MLII wrote:to either A be a troll
This isn't serious.
...Oh come on you know what I mean. :P
Rsandee wrote:
I personally think this topic has no value on PC and if it had been anyone else starting it, it would've been locked on the first day.
Implying any other topic here on RPC has value.
Well they certainly have more value than this one. ^^

I'm not up for arguing on this.

Re: Of the extermination of furfags

Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 7:00 pm
by spiraldoor
MLII wrote:Well posts like
spiraldoor wrote:I have no interest in leftist nonsense such as ‘tolerance’ or ‘open-mindedness’.
can't be real.
Are you sure? Why not?
MLII wrote:Did I say that it was? No. Did I say that it wasn't? No. I was just pointing out that so many of you seemed to think he was being serious (as opposed to sarcastic).
It’s pretty clear that he was being serious; check the religion thread for more of his mad rants against Christians and Europeans and a couple of grovelling pseudo-apologies. If this is all some kind of elaborate joke, he’s the greatest joker we’ve ever had.
MLII wrote:Well they certainly have more value than this one. ^^
Not really. This is a very good thread.

Re: Of the extermination of furfags

Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 7:51 pm
by Adsolution
MLII wrote:
spiraldoor wrote:
MLII wrote:You know what guys? Screw this I agree with IAB.

Now, I completely believe most of this topic was meant to be a joke. I mean, RayFan isn't serious, Spiraldoor can't be serious (not about the furry thing anyway),
You seem awfully certain of that.
Well posts like
spiraldoor wrote:I have no interest in leftist nonsense such as ‘tolerance’ or ‘open-mindedness’.

can't be real.
Buddha will strike you down with a dumbbell for your lack of bigotry.

Re: Of the extermination of furfags

Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 8:21 pm
by timoo
Oh shi-

Re: Of the extermination of furfags

Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 8:27 pm
by DesLife
This topic has certainly been entertaining since it was created !

Re: Of the extermination of furfags

Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 8:28 pm
by Rulez
Yeah, I even wrote a wall of text but it got deleted by DesLife.

I need to make a new one Image

Re: Of the extermination of furfags

Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 9:05 pm
by timoo
MLII wrote:I personally think this topic has no value on PC and if it had been anyone else starting it, it would've been locked on the first day.
MLII suks hard
MLII suks hard
:mickey:

Re: Of the extermination of furfags

Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 10:13 pm
by stan423321
And still nobody seemingly answered whether my friend playing as goat in Revenge of Mutant Camels shall be considered a potential furry.

Re: Of the extermination of furfags

Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2011 12:51 am
by timoo
stan423321 wrote:And still nobody seemingly answered whether my friend playing as goat in Revenge of Mutant Camels shall be considered a potential furry.
stan never maeks sense
stan never maeks sense

Re: Of the extermination of furfags

Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2011 12:56 am
by Keane
DesLife wrote:This topic has certainly been entertaining since it was created !
I must agree on that. Too bad I found out about it so late.

Re: Of the extermination of furfags

Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2011 3:11 am
by Adsolution
RayTunes wrote:
DesLife wrote:This topic has certainly been entertaining since it was created !
I must agree on that. Too bad I found out about it so late.
There will be no mercy.

































































































Image

Re: Of the extermination of furfags

Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2011 4:48 am
by Keane
What was that? :P

Re: Of the extermination of furfags

Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2011 5:35 am
by Adsolution
RayTunes wrote:What was that? :P
A warning.


















Nothing more.

Re: Of the extermination of furfags

Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2011 5:52 am
by Keane
Image

Re: Of the extermination of furfags

Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2011 7:53 am
by iambored2006
Rsandee wrote: It only took one glance at this post to make me embarrased of the fact that I live on the same planet as you.
Well done.
Don't worry, buddy. It's mutual.

spiraldoor wrote:
MLII wrote:For the record, that religion post of IABs up there was probably completely sarcastic from the "Does that mean they're Christian" part downwards. Did nobody else get that? I thought it was obvious.
Even if he was, that wouldn’t mean his post was appropriate or acceptable. Or that he’s not a lunatic.
Wait, did you all think I was serious?! And you thought I was an idiot for not getting the joke in this topic! However, I agree with you- the post was not acceptable, and I'm a lunatic. And for the protocol, my last post before the ban was partially a joke. I'm planning a sig based on that post.
spiral, regarding the "pseudo-apologies" comment of yours, I wasn't apologizing for my opinion of Europe. I was apologizing for the radical and obscene way in which I was expressing myself. Apparently, I was banned for speaking ill of Europe.

Re: Of the extermination of furfags

Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2011 1:29 pm
by spiraldoor
iambored2006 wrote:Wait, did you all think I was serious?!
iambored2006 wrote:And for the protocol, my last post before the ban was partially a joke.
Backpedal harder.
iambored2006 wrote:I'm planning a sig based on that post.
Cool story, bro.
iambored2006 wrote:Apparently, I was banned for speaking ill of Europe.
Damn right! And don’t you forget it.