Page 151 of 551

Re: Rayman 2

Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 7:15 pm
by PluMGMK
spiraldoor wrote:how the hell was I meant to know that I was supposed to shoot at the piranhas?
I never shot the piranhas. :?

Re: Rayman 2

Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 7:32 pm
by spiraldoor
Xenon wrote:All I can find are some other Raydragon arguments. If you could provide the direct link I'll look into it. As far as I can remember (and as far as I knew at the time), Raydragon never argued that the second and third game were set in the same universe.
Here is the thread in question. Raydragon argued at length that Rayman 1 took place in another universe, but nobody ever argued that Rayman 2 and 3 were set in different universes, as you seem to think he did.
Xenon wrote:It was an instruction. An instruction which required no response other than an understanding. But if you'd like to debate about the multi-layered levels of 'experience' of the game then I'm more than happy to commit myself to this.
You asked me to ‘draw a line between ‘understand’ and ‘discuss in great detail’’. Now you tell me that you didn’t want me to post an actual response, but rather to meditate on your ‘instruction’? I don’t think it was reasonable of you to assume that I would know that you did not want me to respond to your ‘instruction’.

Assuming that you’re not joking, I certainly wouldn’t mind a discussion about the ‘experience’ of gaming.
Xenon wrote:I never argued about it; you were the one who primarily brought me into this discussion by mentioning the Rayman 1 map.
I made a single offhand reference to the Rayman 1 map in a discussion about the Hall of Doors. This reference was completely apt, as it was meant to do no more than draw attention to the entirely relevant near-identicality of the R1 map and the Hall in terms of the gameplay function they provide. I noted that you may not understand this gameplay reference, as you had not played the game in question and had given me significant reason to doubt your knowledge of it, as I have explained above. A page later, you picked out this quote and in doing so started a discussion about how it annoyed you.

I don’t think I can be held responsible for your presence in this discussion.
PluMGMK wrote:I never shot the piranhas. :?
What the hell? How did you finish the level without shooting the piranhas to scare them away from the air bubbles?

Re: Rayman 2

Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 7:35 pm
by Jewish Candy
Spiral, you need to be quick and grab the blue lums/air bubbles before they do... :| Though shooting makes things easier.

Re: Rayman 2

Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 8:44 pm
by El Dango
How is it possible to swim that fast then?

Re: Rayman 2

Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 8:50 pm
by Jewish Candy
Plan your route beforehand. It's easier to shoot but you don't need to if you USEZ UR BRAINZ :proud:

Re: Rayman 2

Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 11:03 pm
by Xenon
I seem to remember avoiding some bubbles to 'shortcut' my route, but I didn't know it was possible to get through the entire part without killing any piranhas. Interesting
Here is the thread in question. Raydragon argued at length that Rayman 1 took place in another universe, but nobody ever argued that Rayman 2 and 3 were set in different universes, as you seem to think he did.
That seems reasonable. I must have missed that point. However, I still question your thinking about me making such a fundamental mistake. Yes, I misconceived an argument put forward by Raydragon (and let's be honest, this is understandable :wink: ), but having posted tens of thousands of messages here and being a member for five years, do you really think I could have somehow overlooked this elementary difference between R1 and the other games?
You asked me to ‘draw a line between ‘understand’ and ‘discuss in great detail’’. Now you tell me that you didn’t want me to post an actual response, but rather to meditate on your ‘instruction’? I don’t think it was reasonable of you to assume that I would know that you did not want me to respond to your ‘instruction’.
There wasn't much to reply to and I required no written response, so no. I simply drew a differentiation between the knowledge required to discuss R1 in depth and my own personal knowledge as explained, and understanding your intellectual capabilities asked you to do the same! Case closed!
I made a single offhand reference to the Rayman 1 map in a discussion about the Hall of Doors. This reference was completely apt, as it was meant to do no more than draw attention to the entirely relevant near-identicality of the R1 map and the Hall in terms of the gameplay function they provide. I noted that you may not understand this gameplay reference, as you had not played the game in question and had given me significant reason to doubt your knowledge of it, as I have explained above. A page later, you picked out this quote and in doing so started a discussion about how it annoyed you.

I don’t think I can be held responsible for your presence in this discussion.
You said "Nonetheless I don’t think that anyone should argue about a game they’ve not experienced", presumably implying that I did this. I have not argued about Rayman 1, I have argued about my knowledge of the game, which is of course completely different.

Re: Rayman 2

Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 5:07 pm
by spiraldoor
Xenon wrote:That seems reasonable. I must have missed that point. However, I still question your thinking about me making such a fundamental mistake. Yes, I misconceived an argument put forward by Raydragon (and let's be honest, this is understandable :wink: ), but having posted tens of thousands of messages here and being a member for five years, do you really think I could have somehow overlooked this elementary difference between R1 and the other games?
Stranger things have certainly happened. I had no real way to gauge your interest in Rayman 1 (without bringing the subject to your attention, which I eventually did), apart from the fact that you haven’t been motivated to play it even after all these years. The thought that you completely misinterpreted the core point of the argument we took part in at RaymanZone didn’t occur to me, but then again, I didn’t give it a great deal of thought to begin with, as I did not expect the ensuing discussion to drag out for this long.
Xenon wrote:There wasn't much to reply to and I required no written response, so no. I simply drew a differentiation between the knowledge required to discuss R1 in depth and my own personal knowledge as explained, and understanding your intellectual capabilities asked you to do the same! Case closed!
I assumed at the time that you wished for a response, so I reflected that I was unable to give one. Yes, case closed.
Xenon wrote:You said "Nonetheless I don’t think that anyone should argue about a game they’ve not experienced", presumably implying that I did this. I have not argued about Rayman 1, I have argued about my knowledge of the game, which is of course completely different.
The statement you’ve quoted was part of my response to your response to my attempted answer to your instruction that I ‘draw a line between ‘understand’ and ‘discuss in great detail’’. My underlying point was that videogames are such ‘interactive and multisensory experiences’ that while somebody may be able to ‘understand’ them without playing them, they cannot ‘discuss in great detail’ an experience they have not had. The statement was intended in a broader and more general sense, and was not meant to specifically relate to any one person and game. As with above, I didn’t contemplate my statement or its implications for very long, as that would make the writing of such lengthy posts within a short while impossible. I apologise for the misunderstanding.

Re: Rayman 2

Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 6:11 pm
by Xenon
It happens to the best of us, and apology accepted. In the future make sure you ask me about anything I post that seems peculiar before making such assumptions. I'm sure you can understand why I took offence to your thoughts.

Anyway yes, let's get back to Rayman 2.

Re: Rayman 2

Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2010 2:36 pm
by phj
I didn't knew it was possible to kill those piranhas. Shooting slows down a lot underwater.

Re: Rayman 2

Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2010 3:12 pm
by Jewish Candy
That's why it's best not to bother :wink:

And I'd love to know what the 'least known part of the Netherlands' is. :fou:

Re: Rayman 2

Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2010 4:25 pm
by spiraldoor
Image
I found this on Rayman Fanpage. It looks like a different version of the map of the Glade of Dreams. It’s more colourful, the Prison Ship appears to be on the left of the map rather than the top, and the Archipelago has been replaced by a single large island in the bottom-left. Has anyone seen a larger version of this map anywhere?

Re: Rayman 2

Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 1:11 am
by Marley
I found this on Rayman Fanpage. It looks like a different version of the map of the Glade of Dreams. It’s more colourful, the Prison Ship appears to be on the left of the map rather than the top, and the Archipelago has been replaced by a single large island in the bottom-left. Has anyone seen a larger version of this map anywhere?
I think I have, but the quality was terrible. I don't remember it being much bigger than that either, so I can't help you sorry... wait!
Isn't there a bigger version on the RayWiki? ...no, that's a different one, isn't it? DAMN! They look so similar. I think the one you found might be the same, but with minor colour alterations around the watery areas and border, but I'm not totally sure.

Re: Rayman 2

Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 12:23 pm
by Droolie
Actually, the only 'other' map I know of is the map in the textures of the Isle of Doors in the Dreamcast version. That reminds me, I still need to rip that one and put it online.

Re: Rayman 2

Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 1:39 pm
by Rsandee
Wait, isn't it possible to port Rayman Revolution to the gamecube?
It would help me since i have a wii.

Re: Rayman 2

Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 3:10 pm
by Haruka
Remember that Gamecube uses Mini-DVDs which contain around 1GB plus some megabytes. I don't believe that reducing the graphical quality of the game would be enough to fit on the GC disk.

Re: Rayman 2

Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 4:32 pm
by Rsandee
Could we make an wii exclusive RR then?
As an .gc file, i don't think that's possible but it's an question.

Re: Rayman 2

Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 6:19 pm
by spiraldoor
Drolpiraat wrote:Actually, the only 'other' map I know of is the map in the textures of the Isle of Doors in the Dreamcast version. That reminds me, I still need to rip that one and put it online.
I’ve been meaning to ask you about that for a few days now. Since the Isle of Doors is a sort of miniature version of the Glade of Dreams, it would be fascinating to have the texture by itself and compare it to the actual map.

Re: Rayman 2

Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 2:48 am
by Marley
It could explain why there's more water on the map he found. Imean, the Isle of Doors has TONS of water, while the Glade of Dreams... not so much, only really in the Dreamcast version.

Re: Rayman 2

Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 2:49 am
by Henchman1028
The music in the PS1 version is the best, though.

Re: Rayman 2

Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 2:55 am
by Marley
You mean the music in the PSone, PC and Dreamcast versions? (and a bit with Rayman Revolution, too)