Not necessarily. Depressive suicide could stem from a simple logical fallacy, in which an otherwise strong-willed and level-headed human being makes a very poor decision that costs them, well, their life. This is, admittedly, rarely the case, though.sonicbrawler182 wrote:I meant depressive suicide specifically. I've been multi-tasking, so I have made a few mistakes that I have edit out after the fact. Sorry for the confusion.
Off Topic
Forum rules
Please keep the forum rules and guidelines in mind when creating or replying to a topic.
Please keep the forum rules and guidelines in mind when creating or replying to a topic.
-
technology4617

- Posts: 2340
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 6:25 am
- Location: Small children.
- Tings: 10
Re: Off Topic
Re: Off Topic
But it still exists. I'm okay with people expressing their opinion about suicide, or a more specific kind of suicide, but you can understand that the notion of it being universal is rather shocking...technology4617 wrote:Not necessarily. Depressive suicide could stem from a simple logical fallacy, in which an otherwise strong-willed and level-headed human being makes a very poor decision that costs them, well, their life. This is, admittedly, rarely the case, though.
-
sonicbrawler182

- Posts: 2150
- Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2013 4:09 pm
- Location: Ireland
- Tings: 11810
Re: Off Topic
That's still technically displaying weak will, though. All that's required is to feel it for a brief moment, and that person's life is gone.technology4617 wrote:Not necessarily. Depressive suicide could stem from a simple logical fallacy, in which an otherwise strong-willed and level-headed human being makes a very poor decision that costs them, well, their life. This is, admittedly, rarely the case, though.sonicbrawler182 wrote:I meant depressive suicide specifically. I've been multi-tasking, so I have made a few mistakes that I have edit out after the fact. Sorry for the confusion.
I get what you're saying, but it's still technically displaying a weak will to live, even if something external is warping a person's thoughts and emotions, like being under the influence of certain drugs, and even if it's only for a moment.
Then as well as depressive suicide and euphoric suicide, there's even accidental suicide, where the suicide has nothing to do with a lack of will to live or a preference for death, but the person kills themselves without actually wanting or trying to. What you're describing sounds like accidental suicide, now that I've brought the concept in front of me...
-
Adsolution

- Posts: 22233
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 4:55 pm
- Contact:
- Tings: 110541
Re: Off Topic
All '
' mark statements that contain accusation with no actual statement.
If you aren't willing to move past that despite me personally dismissing something I said earlier as being inaccurate, then screw you man, you make me want to kill myself.
Typo due to a lack of context or a mental slip, they're both mistakes and both deserve a chance to be refuted, as they no longer apply to the current situation no matter what you think.
And to reiterate for the sake of others and for the sake of trying one final time to enable Sonicbrawler's reading ability: Cowardice is, like a lot of other things, a unit of measurement, much like temperature, though obviously abstract, and also reciprocatable. The lack of heat is described as coldness. The lack of cowardice is described as bravery, and the lack of bravery is described as cowardice. What one chooses to identify as 'cold' obviously changes depending on the person and the situation, as is the case with a coward or a courageous person - there is no objective statement that claims that one particular place is 'hot', much like how there is no objective statement that claims that one particular person who committed suicide is a coward. However, what is undeniable is that places that contain temperature contain heat, as that's a qualification for temperature - and likewise, cowardice and courage must also coexist. Obviously, I'm using the word 'cowardice' here and not 'bravery', because I've refuted the idea depressive suicide being an act of bravery (anti-cowardice) in my own point of view, and I'm not going to use the term 'lack of bravery', because that's literally what 'cowardice' means.
A particular plant that's naturally able to survive in incredible heat will be viewed as having an extremely high tolerance to temperature, but if the temperature raises to the point where it is no longer able to survive, it will still have succumbed to the effects of overheating; lost to overheating, but still high-tolerance. A particular person that's naturally able to put up with incredible hardship will be viewed as being extremely courageous, but if it becomes harder to the point where they will no longer be able to put up with it, they will have succumbed to the effects of cowardice; lost to cowardice, but still admirably courageous.
This is not a difficult concept to wrap your head around, Sonicbrawler. Pushing aside whether it is cowardice or not, this clearly describes why I'm not necessarily referring to people who succumb to what I believe to be cowardice as cowards.
sonicbrawler182 wrote:More pointless fluff where you talk big and show that you are ignoring nearly everything I say, yet again. Moving on...
sonicbrawler182 wrote:First of all, the dictionary definitions should have been enough because they make my point pretty concisely clear.
I like how topical puns aren't allowed for some reason, in spite of all else. I still don't understand why.sonicbrawler182 wrote:Also, cut it with the cheesy puns. You aren't being smart or funny with them, and frankly, I don't think anyone would appreciate someone going besides the point to try and make puns (that double as false, ignorant accusations) when discussing the matter of depressive suicide.
sonicbrawler182 wrote:merely pretend you have in your confirmation bias
sonicbrawler182 wrote:instead of trying to be witty, you'd actually be able to make a reasonable point, or maybe you'd actually see where your fault is, learn something from it and, as a result, have a better understanding of how depressive suicide (or even depression in general) works.
Search for the word 'threshold' in this thread.sonicbrawler182 wrote:Total of three times now. You have on three occasions likened suicidal people to cowards.
So one isn't allowed to back out of a claim that they hardly remember making? I don't believe they are the same thing, but at the time I made that post, your introduction of 'weak will' I guess left me somewhat off-guard.sonicbrawler182 wrote:You made the most direct claim you have made this entire time. That wasn't a matter of poor wording (way too stark a contrast to the opposite view), that was the truth coming out, the most defined and extreme stance you've claimed to have in this discussion.
If you aren't willing to move past that despite me personally dismissing something I said earlier as being inaccurate, then screw you man, you make me want to kill myself.
Oh? I don't believe you, I think that was the truth coming out.sonicbrawler182 wrote:I meant depressive suicide specifically. I've been multi-tasking, so I have made a few mistakes that I have edit out after the fact. Sorry for the confusion.
Typo due to a lack of context or a mental slip, they're both mistakes and both deserve a chance to be refuted, as they no longer apply to the current situation no matter what you think.
Search for the word 'threshold' in this thread.sonicbrawler182 wrote:At least some part of you believes all suicidal people are cowards (though considering how this whole discussion has gone, I doubt it's a small part, kinda was getting the impression you felt that before you even directly said it).
Again, don't simplify what someone's said. I'm not applying cowardice as strictly a motive for [depressive] suicide, rather as a motive for things on a more subconscious level, taking a prominent role in our day-to-day activities as well. Depressive suicide, and I've explained why, I find to be related to decisions that occur in our minds that reflect cowardice, or backing out of an ordeal. It doesn't matter if the ordeal is tedious and mundane and poses a high chance of failure, the failure to see it through is due to not wanting to have to put up with the challenge, despite the gold you desire potentially laying at the end of the road. If you don't want to be alive and happy, you would simply rather be dead overall, then that's preferring the qualities of death over the qualities of life, which is not what this discussion is about.saerleiya wrote:You both know that it's not always the case.
And to reiterate for the sake of others and for the sake of trying one final time to enable Sonicbrawler's reading ability: Cowardice is, like a lot of other things, a unit of measurement, much like temperature, though obviously abstract, and also reciprocatable. The lack of heat is described as coldness. The lack of cowardice is described as bravery, and the lack of bravery is described as cowardice. What one chooses to identify as 'cold' obviously changes depending on the person and the situation, as is the case with a coward or a courageous person - there is no objective statement that claims that one particular place is 'hot', much like how there is no objective statement that claims that one particular person who committed suicide is a coward. However, what is undeniable is that places that contain temperature contain heat, as that's a qualification for temperature - and likewise, cowardice and courage must also coexist. Obviously, I'm using the word 'cowardice' here and not 'bravery', because I've refuted the idea depressive suicide being an act of bravery (anti-cowardice) in my own point of view, and I'm not going to use the term 'lack of bravery', because that's literally what 'cowardice' means.
A particular plant that's naturally able to survive in incredible heat will be viewed as having an extremely high tolerance to temperature, but if the temperature raises to the point where it is no longer able to survive, it will still have succumbed to the effects of overheating; lost to overheating, but still high-tolerance. A particular person that's naturally able to put up with incredible hardship will be viewed as being extremely courageous, but if it becomes harder to the point where they will no longer be able to put up with it, they will have succumbed to the effects of cowardice; lost to cowardice, but still admirably courageous.
This is not a difficult concept to wrap your head around, Sonicbrawler. Pushing aside whether it is cowardice or not, this clearly describes why I'm not necessarily referring to people who succumb to what I believe to be cowardice as cowards.
-
Serza5

- Posts: 48387
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 7:51 pm
- Location: MOTHER FUCKING SCOTLAND OH YEAH BABY
- Contact:
- Tings: 490135
Re: Off Topic
Ads we fucking talked about this and we had advised you to at least have the fucking decency to take this to PM.
The fact that this conversation is still going on is fucking amazing.
The fact that this conversation is still going on is fucking amazing.
-
Adsolution

- Posts: 22233
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 4:55 pm
- Contact:
- Tings: 110541
Re: Off Topic
Yeah, I know right? Conversations that last a fucking while, contain lengthy fucking replies and don't move as fucking smooth as fucking butter are inherently indecent, right?Serza5 wrote:The fact that this conversation is still going on is fucking amazing.
Others have clearly been contributing here and there as well, they wouldn't have been able to do so if the conversation were private.
Re: Off Topic
I already knew the concept. Like water is very helpful for life, but can still kill you if you consume too much of it.Adsolution wrote:And to reiterate for the sake of others and for the sake of trying one final time to enable Sonicbrawler's reading ability: Cowardice is, like a lot of other things, a unit of measurement, much like temperature, though obviously abstract, and also reciprocatable
-
Shrooblord

- Posts: 15762
- Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 5:07 pm
- Location: The Buccaneer MK. II
- Tings: 68850
Re: Off Topic
That's a funny point you raise, actually. I was just sketching up some storyboards for my game yesterday and although I realised that I cannot draw Ly for shit (really, she looks terrible), I kept drawing because I wanted to get the storyboard out, keeping in the back of my mind that it's probably a good idea that I study up on some reference pictures of her before I continue with frames she features in.Adsolution wrote:To create another example, art blocks, feeling unmotivated to do creative things is usually due to being afraid that you won't be able to come up with something creative. You're too afraid to trust yourself, and the fear of disappointing others and yourself is a huge factor. Pushing these fears aside is all that's needed to help you, hence why things like marijuana typically aid creativity - they make you confident and abolish the sociological fear that's holding you back.
What to take from that is: don't be afraid of yourself or your own doings, even if you hate them, that's good, for you will know why you hate them and you will now how to improve yourself/your art. The result: no art block.
====
Correct and incorrect. You seem to have missed another definition of will as it is used in this discussion: will in the meaning of willpower means the mind. "I do not have the will to live" means "My mind cannot take the notion of life anymore", not "I do not want to live". These are very minute but crucially important differences as I'm seeing that these misinterpretations are making both of you unnecessarily angry at each other.sonicbrawler182 wrote:"I do not have a wish to live."
"I do not have a desire to live."
"I do not have a motivation to live."
"I do not have a will to live."
Think of 'will' as it is used in Fable (do you know the game Fable?). They don't mean 'the want to do something'; they mean 'the power in the mind to do something'. Manipulating objects with will is called 'telekinesis', not 'moving stuff with your muscles' (which it would be called if will, in this discussion, meant what you're holding it to mean).
Not trying to be all in-your-face and snooty about definitions here, but thought I'd clear the confusion up as I see there is some hanging around.
====
Although I see where your concern comes from, Serza - I mean, you guys are probably afraid this gets too heated -, I enjoy seeing some more lively conversation. Heated discussion doesn't mean people are going to off each other with words. Sonic and Ads are keeping it incredibly civil still, even if either are or are not insulting the other. I've enjoyed reading people's opinions on the matter and would not want the forum to shy this discussion away. That would feel like censorship.
But, I guess, if you feel that is what is to happen, the mods rule this land... I shut my mouth.
Re: Off Topic
I don't think the conversation was a problem, but it is getting heavier now. I didn't really know what to say until a few hours ago, but that was still a bit shallow.Shrooblord wrote: Although I see where your concern comes from, Serza - I mean, you guys are probably afraid this gets too heated -, I enjoy seeing some more lively conversation. Heated discussion doesn't mean people are going to off each other with words. Sonic and Ads are keeping it incredibly civil still, even if either are or are not insulting the other. I've enjoyed reading people's opinions on the matter and would not want the forum to shy this discussion away. That would feel like censorship.
But, I guess, if you feel that is what is to happen, the mods rule this land... I shut my mouth.
Strange to think that's Robin Williams' deaht which caused everything to happen. We will still miss you, Robin
Gonna keep on doing stuff around there for myself. Internship is almost done and I'll have even more time after it, even if I will go to Seattle for Pax Prime and to Montréal right after.
-
Serza5

- Posts: 48387
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 7:51 pm
- Location: MOTHER FUCKING SCOTLAND OH YEAH BABY
- Contact:
- Tings: 490135
Re: Off Topic
I'll apologise for what I said as it came from pure annoyance and the exact thing I said was out of line. I do not wish to say that heated discussions aren't allowed but sometimes, when it's between two members who aren't known for getting along, that you fear it's going to turn into a flamed argument, or believe it to have gone down that road already.
Re: Off Topic
Members have strong personality on RPC, it seems...
-
rolesfamily

- Posts: 10232
- Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 6:43 pm
- Tings: 74925
Re: Off Topic
Wow quite a few things here lately I never thought I'd see.
Re: Off Topic
I have a question for the wiki users: Did you know the French and the English Wiki are ignoring each other about searches? I guess it's because they are two different versions of the same website instead of being two sections of it, making equivalent pages searches difficult.
I noticed that as Master asked me some help for the translation of the 'Switches' page: I made a quick search on the English wiki, and nothing appeared as I typed the equivalent in French. However, as I was looking for the in-game description of a Switch on google, the french page made by boomboleros7 instantly popped out in the first results. I told myself "damn, fortunately I haven't created the page yet on the English wiki XD"...
I noticed that as Master asked me some help for the translation of the 'Switches' page: I made a quick search on the English wiki, and nothing appeared as I typed the equivalent in French. However, as I was looking for the in-game description of a Switch on google, the french page made by boomboleros7 instantly popped out in the first results. I told myself "damn, fortunately I haven't created the page yet on the English wiki XD"...
-
PluMGMK

- Posts: 40515
- Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 9:00 pm
- Location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cErgMJSgpv0
- Contact:
- Tings: 136641
Re: Off Topic
Well, they are two different sites, like any other multilingual Wiki. Surely doing it any other way would involve lots of unnecessary complications.
-
Shrooblord

- Posts: 15762
- Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 5:07 pm
- Location: The Buccaneer MK. II
- Tings: 68850
Re: Off Topic
A specialised Google Search bar might be nice though (the type of thing that can also be easily achieved by adding "site: raymanpc.com" to the search, except it's implemented for people not in the know) to avoid such complications.
-
technology4617

- Posts: 2340
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 6:25 am
- Location: Small children.
- Tings: 10
Re: Off Topic
Hey, if anyone's interested, I'm going to be doing a livestream of my first playthrough of Five Nights at Freddy's at noon tomorrow PST (that's 9pm for you children in Europe). Should be fun, perhaps even scary, but be sure to pop by if you can.
http://twitch.tv/technology4617
http://twitch.tv/technology4617
Re: Off Topic
You’re a child as well.technology4617 wrote:…that's 9pm for you children in Europe…
-
Hunchman801

- Posts: 87661
- Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2003 6:50 pm
- Location: Paris, France
- Contact:
- Tings: 640417
Re: Off Topic
Too bad, I'll be out tomorrow night. That game looks pretty cool though!
Re: Off Topic
I just heard about that game yesterday. Is it recent?
-
ikke471

- Posts: 7077
- Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 6:25 pm
- Location: Who knows? Did you check your closet? I would If I were you...
- Contact:
- Tings: 0
Re: Off Topic
it's fairly recent but holy shit is it scary


