All '

' mark statements that contain accusation with no actual statement.
sonicbrawler182 wrote:More pointless fluff where you talk big and show that you are ignoring nearly everything I say, yet again. Moving on...
sonicbrawler182 wrote:First of all, the dictionary definitions should have been enough because they make my point pretty concisely clear.
sonicbrawler182 wrote:Also, cut it with the cheesy puns. You aren't being smart or funny with them, and frankly, I don't think anyone would appreciate someone going besides the point to try and make puns (that double as false, ignorant accusations) when discussing the matter of depressive suicide.
I like how topical puns aren't allowed for some reason, in spite of all else. I still don't understand why.
sonicbrawler182 wrote:merely pretend you have in your confirmation bias
sonicbrawler182 wrote:instead of trying to be witty, you'd actually be able to make a reasonable point, or maybe you'd actually see where your fault is, learn something from it and, as a result, have a better understanding of how depressive suicide (or even depression in general) works.
sonicbrawler182 wrote:Total of three times now. You have on three occasions likened suicidal people to cowards.
Search for the word 'threshold' in this thread.
sonicbrawler182 wrote:You made the most direct claim you have made this entire time. That wasn't a matter of poor wording (way too stark a contrast to the opposite view), that was the truth coming out, the most defined and extreme stance you've claimed to have in this discussion.
So one isn't allowed to back out of a claim that they hardly remember making? I don't believe they are the same thing, but at the time I made that post, your introduction of 'weak will' I guess left me somewhat off-guard.
If you aren't willing to move past that despite me personally dismissing something I said earlier as being inaccurate, then screw you man, you make me want to kill myself.
sonicbrawler182 wrote:I meant depressive suicide specifically. I've been multi-tasking, so I have made a few mistakes that I have edit out after the fact. Sorry for the confusion.
Oh? I don't believe you, I think that was the truth coming out.
Typo due to a lack of context or a mental slip, they're both mistakes and both deserve a chance to be refuted, as they no longer apply to the current situation no matter what you think.
sonicbrawler182 wrote:At least some part of you believes all suicidal people are cowards (though considering how this whole discussion has gone, I doubt it's a small part, kinda was getting the impression you felt that before you even directly said it).
Search for the word 'threshold' in this thread.
saerleiya wrote:You both know that it's not always the case.
Again, don't simplify what someone's said. I'm not applying cowardice as strictly a motive for [depressive] suicide, rather as a motive for things on a more subconscious level, taking a prominent role in our day-to-day activities as well. Depressive suicide, and I've explained why, I find to be related to decisions that occur in our minds that reflect cowardice, or backing out of an ordeal. It doesn't matter if the ordeal is tedious and mundane and poses a high chance of failure, the failure to see it through is due to not wanting to have to put up with the challenge, despite the gold you desire potentially laying at the end of the road. If you don't want to be alive and happy, you would simply rather be dead overall, then that's preferring the qualities of death over the qualities of life, which is not what this discussion is about.
And to reiterate for the sake of others and for the sake of trying one final time to enable Sonicbrawler's reading ability: Cowardice is, like a lot of other things, a unit of measurement, much like temperature, though obviously abstract, and also reciprocatable. The lack of heat is described as coldness. The lack of cowardice is described as bravery, and the lack of bravery is described as cowardice. What one chooses to identify as 'cold' obviously changes depending on the person and the situation, as is the case with a coward or a courageous person - there is no objective statement that claims that one particular place is 'hot', much like how there is no objective statement that claims that one particular person who committed suicide is a coward. However, what is undeniable is that places that contain temperature contain heat, as that's a qualification for temperature - and likewise, cowardice and courage must also coexist. Obviously, I'm using the word 'cowardice' here and not 'bravery', because I've refuted the idea depressive suicide being an act of bravery (anti-cowardice) in my own point of view, and I'm not going to use the term 'lack of bravery', because that's literally what 'cowardice' means.
A particular plant that's naturally able to survive in incredible heat will be viewed as having an extremely high tolerance to temperature, but if the temperature raises to the point where it is no longer able to survive, it will still have succumbed to the effects of overheating; lost to overheating, but still high-tolerance. A particular person that's naturally able to put up with incredible hardship will be viewed as being extremely courageous, but if it becomes harder to the point where they will no longer be able to put up with it, they will have succumbed to the effects of cowardice; lost to cowardice, but still admirably courageous.
This is not a difficult concept to wrap your head around, Sonicbrawler. Pushing aside whether it is cowardice or not, this clearly describes why I'm not necessarily referring to people who succumb to what I believe to be cowardice as cowards.