Rayman Pirate-Community

Ah, ok - thanks Stan.

RayFan9876 wrote:My hair is a bird, therefore your argument is invalid.

I'm glad you didn't get to see it Shroob, especially cause you didn't know what 34 was about. Me, on the other hand... :C This image will be burned into my brain forever.

Spanex wrote:I'm glad you didn't get to see it Shroob, especially cause you didn't know what 34 was about. Me, on the other hand... :C This image will be burned into my brain forever.

I Google it like most people would, and the first thing I see is Rayman jacking off. Interestingly enough, all these images were drawn very well - by that I mean they looked like professional artwork, which raises some very odd questions.

Plenty of fetish/porn "artists" around, they often have amazing grasp of anatomy, which makes things even uncannier. I won't go into detail about the link that was put here. Sometimes an image would get so much popularity among fetishists that they would undeniably hit the deviantART front page, sometimes uncensored and available for anyone to see.

Well, enough about this. I suppose a sig from me is required now. Though I believe the jar of tings is going to win.

Holy mother of fucking allah, what did you guys do to give Spanex thoughts about rule 34 on DeviantART?

My vote will go to either Powerpatrick, Hunchman or Haruka.
Shame on Des for trying to win by revealing his/her gender, if he/she/it has one.

Were I to lose this contest, I'd consider people do not care about my gender and thus would not tolerate any more bitching about it. I win either way.

RayTunes wrote:Holy mother of fucking allah, what did you guys do to give Spanex thoughts about rule 34 on DeviantART?

(Rayman3ds linked a 34 of Rayman two pages back and it was early in the morning. Don't blame me!)

I did not say 34 on devART, I said porn/fetish on devART (not that it makes much difference, but it's still there.), and also I would never search willingly for this kind of stuff. Most images (luckily not many) I come across happen have made it to the front page, which I visit daily. And when they do, the thumbnails often seem to show a good work of anatomy, almost enviously good. But that's all there's to it. It's a real shame what the skill is being used for.

Spanex wrote:

RayTunes wrote:Holy mother of fucking allah, what did you guys do to give Spanex thoughts about rule 34 on DeviantART?

(Rayman3ds linked a 34 of Rayman two pages back and it was early in the morning. Don't blame me!)

I would never search willingly for this kind of stuff. Most images (luckily not many) I come across happen to be on the front page, which I visit daily. And when they do, the thumbnails often seem to show a good work of anatomy, almost enviously good. It's a real shame what the skill is being used for.

I agree with this one-hundred percent. However, is there a particular reason that these artists are so good at what they do?

RayFan9876 wrote:

Spanex wrote:

RayTunes wrote:Holy mother of fucking allah, what did you guys do to give Spanex thoughts about rule 34 on DeviantART?

(Rayman3ds linked a 34 of Rayman two pages back and it was early in the morning. Don't blame me!)

I would never search willingly for this kind of stuff. Most images (luckily not many) I come across happen to be on the front page, which I visit daily. And when they do, the thumbnails often seem to show a good work of anatomy, almost enviously good. It's a real shame what the skill is being used for.

I agree with this one-hundred percent. However, is there a particular reason that these artists are so good at what they do?

I once knew a person who had a fetish for feet (yes, seriously.) his artwork was very comical, but feet were an exception. Often oversized and very detailed. I think it has to do with the fetishist's interest for that particular body part. You know what happens when you draw one thing very often. You become good at drawing it.

Spanex wrote:I once knew a person who had a fetish for feet (yes, seriously.)

Actually, for some reason I do not quite understand, this is a very common fetish.

Yeah, well, google up a list of common fetishes and feast your eyes on gawking and doubletaking.

Spanex wrote:

RayFan9876 wrote:

Spanex wrote:

RayTunes wrote:Holy mother of fucking allah, what did you guys do to give Spanex thoughts about rule 34 on DeviantART?

(Rayman3ds linked a 34 of Rayman two pages back and it was early in the morning. Don't blame me!)

I would never search willingly for this kind of stuff. Most images (luckily not many) I come across happen to be on the front page, which I visit daily. And when they do, the thumbnails often seem to show a good work of anatomy, almost enviously good. It's a real shame what the skill is being used for.

I agree with this one-hundred percent. However, is there a particular reason that these artists are so good at what they do?

I once knew a person who had a fetish for feet (yes, seriously.) his artwork was very comical, but feet were an exception. Often oversized and very detailed. I think it has to do with the fetishist's interest for that particular body part. You know what happens when you draw one thing very often. You become good at drawing it.

That makes sense, and I guess art-wise you could become a very good artist in general if your fetish shifted every few months!

Signature wise I'm definitely voting for Matyuv and Haruka,

DesLife wrote:Were I to lose this contest, I'd consider people do not care about my gender and thus would not tolerate any more bitching about it. I win either way.

Sure you will get a vote of mine

People have still the chance to participate until day 26th November at 23:59h in the Portuguese hour.

13 entries are good by the way

Does anyone remember the record of entries in all these 32 editions? Unless this edition breaks the record.

Was not Hoodlum Halloween?

Perhaps we should record our number of sigs for every SOTM in the list.

Agree with that idea