Page 169 of 263
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 1:07 am
by Serza5
Adsolution wrote:8.5/10 - Love the new signature, it's a fruitful successor to your other, but the left side of the image feels slightly empty.
It does, but how do I fix it? Wallace doesn't look good being on just one side, and it doesn't look right without the text being there, and text of both sides would look silly.
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 1:30 am
by Adsolution
I have a feeling the name should go in the top left corner, or at least a different corner than it's in now. Maybe shifting Wallace a tiny bit over to the right afterward would fill up the space. Not much, just a little.
Rate that signature!
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 1:31 am
by Minor-T5
I see you've got a new sig Serza! Nice.
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 1:34 am
by Adsolution
schmooky.luke wrote:I see you've got a new sig Serza! Nice.
You gonna rank it?
As for your signature, 10/10. I like the GIF and I like the quote. :>
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 1:41 am
by Serza5
Adsolution wrote:I have a feeling the name should go in the top left corner, or at least a different corner than it's in now. Maybe shifting Wallace a tiny bit over to the right afterward would fill up the space. Not much, just a little.
Might have to see what I can do then, unfortunately I merge all my layers before I round off the edges and as the noob I am I don't save an un-rounded copy of the sig.
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 1:46 am
by Adsolution
There's no real need to merge the layers, seeing as nothing except the background overlaps the corners.

Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 3:44 am
by Keane
10/10
Nice and with better username.
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 4:17 am
by Minor-T5
Adsolution wrote:schmooky.luke wrote:I see you've got a new sig Serza! Nice.
You gonna rank it?
As for your signature, 10/10. I like the GIF and I like the quote. :>
Thanks Adsolution

. And as for yours, I would give it a 10/10...well...because its Rayman Revenge of the Dark!

Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 8:58 pm
by Serza5
Adsolution wrote:There's no real need to merge the layers, seeing as nothing except the background overlaps the corners.

Even if I did keep most of it un-merged I usually do effects on top of the layers so even if I did move him i'd have to re-apply all the effects or else it'd look wonky.

Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 11:19 pm
by Nannerb3
9/10, not as good as Lin Bei-Fong, but still a good signature.
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 11:45 pm
by Serza5
Y u no like Wallace?
Also your sig needs some updating.

Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 12:14 am
by Adsolution
Updating in the form of rounded edges?
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 12:18 am
by Keane
The text looks out of place on greenbottle's sig.
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 12:30 am
by Nannerb3
Serza5 wrote:Y u no like Wallace?
Also your sig needs some updating.

I don't know who Wallace is, but it's a nice sig. xD
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2012 11:34 pm
by Serza5
Adsolution wrote:Updating in the form of rounded edges?
No I mean a completely new one.
TBH I think the current one is horrible.

Of course I say that for all my old sigs but still.
EDIT : Rate new Wallace fags.

Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 7:38 pm
by Danone
10/10 I love that blue background.
(Don't rate me if you don't want since I have multiples sigs)
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2012 3:50 pm
by Serza5
9/10 for your R4 prototype one, it'd be perfect if you fixed up Rayman.

The colours on him look a bit off.
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 7:48 pm
by Rayman fan2000
10/10 The background looks pretty cool and I like seeing anime style.
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 12:13 pm
by Rayrobi
6/10 many things in your sig doesn't fit to each other
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 1:29 am
by Serza5
@RF2k : 5/10, like Robi said the aspects of the sig don't blend in together at all (I.e. the character, border, text etc). Plus that plain white background is a no no even if it isn't the majority of the sig.
@Rayrobi : No idea if I already rated it but 6/10, I like the edges and the text but otherwise it's pretty meh and out of proportion. Also the text at the bottom is nothing exciting.