Rayman Pirate-Community

8/10 - while the aesthetical placement of things in your signature is basically perfect, I do think it seems far too oversaturated.

10/10, Nice composition, Adsolution.

7/10 blurrryyyy

5/10 the top left corner is bugging me to no end. Not to mention the fact that the sig doesn't blend well at all.

5/10 the font looks awful.

Hm? Standing by your logic your sig is worth 2/10 then.

Serza5 wrote:Hm? Standing by your logic your sig is worth 2/10 then.

That's awesome, You're awesome. Are all scottish women this awesome?

7/10. Dunno why but colours don't fit together very well for me in this sig (grey and pink ).

I don't think the colour combo is bad it's more-so to do with the fact that the sig doesn't blend these colours in too well.

Rayman3DS wrote:

Serza5 wrote:Hm? Standing by your logic your sig is worth 2/10 then.

That's awesome, You're awesome. Are all scottish women this awesome?

Why don't you go ask Acarr? She's a sexy Scottish lady much like myself.

@Saer : The image gets 6/10 because meh, not a bad looking sig just not outstanding by any manner of means But your sig as a whole loses points for being that tad too big; the image, one of your quotes and the link would be fine.

Serza5 wrote:I don't think the colour combo is bad it's more-so to do with the fact that the sig doesn't blend these colours in too well.

Rayman3DS wrote:

Serza5 wrote:Hm? Standing by your logic your sig is worth 2/10 then.

That's awesome, You're awesome. Are all scottish women this awesome?

Why don't you go ask Acarr? She's a sexy Scottish lady much like myself.

If she's anything like you, I probably wouldn't even bother.

7/10 for Rayman3DS - I think the main problem is that the background is too dark.

Adsolution wrote:7/10 for Rayman3DS - I think the main problem is that the background is too dark.

Yeah, made it a long time ago. Probably should change it..
9/10 for yours

7/10, this one is better but aye the black background doesn't look nice It'd be kick ass if it was completely transparent. I'm also not fond of Rayman's positioning.

10/10 Background is cool and the text glows.
EDIT: Wait, no it doesn't.

Nah it just has a black glow behind it.

4/10 for the following reasons :

• Text has ugly pixels floating around it
• Parappa is poorly rendered
• Plain blue background is plain (but I give it credit for not being an eye sore)

Serza5 wrote:Nah it just has a black glow behind it.

4/10 for the following reasons :

• Text has ugly pixels floating around it
• Parappa is poorly rendered
• Plain blue background is plain (but I give it credit for not being an eye sore)

Sorry, GIMP doesn't download on this laptop for some reason, So I had to use MS Paint.
Also, that is an official render of Parappa from Playstation All-Stars Battle Royale.

Then they did a poor job anti-aliasing it and checking for white pixels in a couple of spots.
--No need to rate me, but if you want to, you can.--

Excess pixels isn't the problem with the render, it's more like they took out too many pixels to it looks like that he was poorly cut. That or you made it like that yourself since MS Paint (Even it's W7's ver) doesn't support transparency.

Serza5 wrote:Excess pixels isn't the problem with the render, it's more like they took out too many pixels to it looks like that he was poorly cut. That or you made it like that yourself since MS Paint (Even it's W7's ver) doesn't support transparency.

The only version of the picture I could find was JPEG, and GIMP will refuse to download for some reason.

Well you certainly shouldn't be working with MS Paint for obvious reasons. Even if it's a prorgram which focuses on art more than photo manipulation that'd still be much better than paint.