Rayman Pirate-Community

< learned that the blue pigment on M&Ms can cure Spinal injuries that can leave a person paralyzed BUT. it turns your SKIN BLUE.
< thinks its cool, but they try it on mice and they look adorable with blue paws and skin



< daaws forever at the blue skin

< thinks that that would look strange, but not adorable.

PluMGMK wrote:< thinks that that would look strange, but not adorable.

< added picture and still thinks its cute

< now agrees. < had pictured a different shade of blue.

If < were a lab mouse, < would rather be one of the ones force fed M&Ms than be given diseases and dissected. Anyway, I don't think the blue look would work on humans...

< Thinks they should use humans and not force those poor animals.

SuperSunshine wrote:< Thinks they should use humans and not force those poor animals.

< thinks Avatar still looks like a good film
< SUGGESTS EVERYONE TO TAKE PART IN THE SOTM, TEENSIES QUIZ QUEST AND EL DANGO'S COMPETITION RIGHT NOOOOW

< wonders when the DVD will be out.

< would buy it
< suggests everyone to read <'s previous post

El Dango wrote:< hopes it will be more sunny tomorrow.

< is glad this actually happened.

Acarr wrote:< would buy it
< suggests everyone to read <'s previous post

< would participate if < didn't have to make a presentation (< had a good idea)

< approves of brutal cruelty to animals if it will help to cure diseases that affect humans

< is not amused by the Icelandic cloud of volcanic ash and dust which is currently stopping anyone from flying to or from Britain or Ireland

spiraldoor wrote:< approves of brutal cruelty to animals if it will help to cure diseases that affect humans

< is not surprised
< agrees up to a point, but thinks there is a limit though, like if anaesthetic can be applied then it should be if it's painful

< finds the blue skin quite disturbing
< thinks products for humans should be tested on humans

< asks why? Do you not value a human life more than a mouses? Only so many tests can be done on humans, plus there are not so many volunteers.

< thinks things should be tested on condemned criminals or suicidal people or masochists.

< thinks thats a good idea.

<Disagrees with all of the above. I believe that if the tests prior to the actual animal testing (which often isn't as cruel as it is made out to be) provide sufficient evidence to suggest that the substance might not be harmful to humans, animal testing is perfectly acceptable, although I believe that animal testing should only be carried out if there is definitely sufficient evidence to suggest that it might not be harmful to the animal, as I believe that as a dominant species, we should have regard for nature and anything related to it. Animals in the laboratories tend to die after a few days after testing anyway, so I heard in a presentation. I believe that it is necessary to carry out tests on human volunteers if the animal testing stage is successful, although I believe tests on criminals is wrong, as there is still the chance to rehabilitate them.

< agrees with Sam and finds Quickfist, SS and Serza naive. < doesn't care how many rats or mice scientists have to experiment on in order to make progress.
< hates disrespect for science.

Quickfist wrote:< thinks things should be tested on condemned criminals or suicidal people or masochists.

Sorry, but that's the most stupid thing < has heard in a long time.