Rayman Pirate-Community

spiraldoor wrote:

dingodile555 wrote: *MASSIVE FACEPALM*

YOU DON'T HIJACK TITANS IN GOW3, THE TITANS ARE THE PLAYER'S ALLIES AND THE ACTUAL ENVIRONMENTS THAT THE LEVELS ARE SET ON, AND ARE THOUSANDS OF TIMES BIGGER THAN THE ONES IN CRASH OF THE TITANS FOR FUCK'S SAKE.

Once again sounds like someone hasn't seen the actual GoW3 titans gameplay footage:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBJIz-fv-Ng
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NbD7-DMAjRk

Lijik wrote:

spiraldoor wrote:

dingodile555 wrote: *MASSIVE FACEPALM*

YOU DON'T HIJACK TITANS IN GOW3, THE TITANS ARE THE PLAYER'S ALLIES AND THE ACTUAL ENVIRONMENTS THAT THE LEVELS ARE SET ON, AND ARE THOUSANDS OF TIMES BIGGER THAN THE ONES IN CRASH OF THE TITANS FOR FUCK'S SAKE.

Once again sounds like someone hasn't seen the actual GoW3 titans gameplay footage:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBJIz-fv-Ng
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NbD7-DMAjRk

You sound like someone who thinks Cyclopes are Titans.

If you want to see what a Titan in GOW looks like, watch this video from around 2:30 to 2:43.

YES, YOU CAN HIJACK CYCLOPES IN GOW3. BUT THERE WAS AN ENEMY WHICH COULD DO THIS IN GOW2, WHICH WAS RELEASED SEVEN MONTHS BEFORE CRASH OF THE TITANS, THUS FUCKING YOUR LITTLE RIP-OFF CONSPIRACY THEORY. IF ANYTHING, IT'S THE OTHER WAY AROUND.

By the way, your quote mixes me up with dingo. This looks stupid, so fix it please.

dingodile555 wrote:

Hahahahaha no, cause you're a dick. And since I'M a dick I decided to do it again.

Now that thats outta the way, can we go back to discussing THE ACTUAL FUCKING GAME THIS TOPIC IS ABOUT. I don't know if you've checked, but the topic isn't "Spiraldoor gets easily and hilariously riled up about a bunch of shit that has barely anything to do with a new rabbids game". As funny as this all is, I kinda wanna talk about the game.

You know.

The one we just got a whole list of new info about.

Sure, let's talk about Rabbids Go Home.

Go on. You first.

Official Nintendo Magazine wrote:- took almost a year to decide what direction to go with the game

I wonder what they mean with that... had they already decided that it was going to be a rabbids game, or did they consider making it a Rayman game?

And I still hope that the fact that Rayman is out of the title also means that Rayman has other things to do... like defeating some real enemies.
Damn you, Ubisoft! Why don't you at least tell us if Rayman will return anytime soon?

OK let's settle this - next time someone argues about HD TV, they'll get a warning.

Drolpiraat wrote:

Official Nintendo Magazine wrote:- took almost a year to decide what direction to go with the game

I wonder what they mean with that... had they already decided that it was going to be a rabbids game, or did they consider making it a Rayman game?

And I still hope that the fact that Rayman is out of the title also means that Rayman has other things to do... like defeating some real enemies.
Damn you, Ubisoft! Why don't you at least tell us if Rayman will return anytime soon?

A year? Wow, why doesn't that surprise me? I hope that while rabbids are playing Supermarket Sweep, Rayman will finally get some much needed peace away from them. But in fairness, I'm not sure anyone in Ubi are allowed to let these things slip; to quote a former employee who has a DA account, "you can't just waltz out of Ubisoft with a hard drive full of goodies"

dingodile555 wrote: BLU RAY COULD BE A RAYMAN CHARACTER

OH my God....
Why did I find that funny?

dingodile555 wrote: BLU RAY COULD BE A RAYMAN CHARACTER

What, a disk?

Heh, a disk.

Not a very challenging boss though.

Yeah. It could easily get scratched or smudged...

Or shattered.

But it could blind you if the sun reflected off it. D8

Well, Ray-Ray will just have to wear sunglasses.

Drolpiraat wrote:

Official Nintendo Magazine wrote:- took almost a year to decide what direction to go with the game

I wonder what they mean with that... had they already decided that it was going to be a rabbids game, or did they consider making it a Rayman game?

And I still hope that the fact that Rayman is out of the title also means that Rayman has other things to do... like defeating some real enemies.
Damn you, Ubisoft! Why don't you at least tell us if Rayman will return anytime soon?

Well I can only hope Rayman is on an extended vacation. But as I said in RaymanZone somewhere, Ubisoft may plan to retract their 'bungee chord' and continue with the Rabbid franchise. Their plans are, after all, based upon profit gain.

Xenon wrote: Their plans are, after all, based upon profit gain.

<explodes with agreement>

We still have three really good platformers, though.

spiraldoor wrote:We still have three really good platformers, though.

They're starting to age though...

They age well.

Unlike milk.

Indeed.