Re: PlayStation All-Stars Battle Royale - Rayman?
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:42 pm
Go replay Candy Cheteaux. Right now.
I know...clowns.stan423321 wrote:Go replay Candy Cheteaux. Right now.
In that case you'd better steer clear of Stephen King's It.schmooky.luke wrote:No way...ever since I saw the The Dark Knight ( have you seen Christopher Nolan's Batman trilogy?) clowns where never the same again...you know...the joker.Rayman502 wrote:Maybe you can become a clown
I don't even know what your talking about.spiraldoor wrote:In that case you'd better steer clear of Stephen King's It.
schmooky.luke wrote:I don't even know what your talking about.spiraldoor wrote:In that case you'd better steer clear of Stephen King's It.
Even special kids deserve some good education.spiraldoor wrote:That's good to hear.
Well I'm not 12 years old. MUAHAHAHAHAHA!!!sergiomonty wrote:
Also known as
You must be 12 years old...
Even special kids deserve some good education.
So the book is pretty scary?spiraldoor wrote:The film is just Tim Curry being hammy and over-the-top, but the book is actually pretty unsettling.
What's the movie rated? Just wondering...I wanna know the rating before I go watching anything I haven't seen.RayFan9876 wrote:Yeah, the book is definitely well done. The movie actually could have been a lot scarier if they would have just thrown on some kind of dark filter and maybe done disproportionate shots of Tim instead of ones making him obviously look like a silly clown. It's not hard, the filmography was just bad.
What context of 'rating' are you even referring to?schmooky.luke wrote:What's the movie rated?RayFan9876 wrote:Yeah, the book is definitely well done. The movie actually could have been a lot scarier if they would have just thrown on some kind of dark filter and maybe done disproportionate shots of Tim instead of ones making him obviously look like a silly clown. It's not hard, the filmography was just bad.
Haven't you ever heard of ratings like G PG PG-13 R and other ratings like that?RayFan9876 wrote:What context of 'rating' are you even referring to?
Duh, but they differ per region, and I couldn't tell if you were asking that or what percent it might have gotten on the Rotten Tomatoes.schmooky.luke wrote:Haven't you ever heard of ratings like G PG PG-13 R and other ratings like that?RayFan9876 wrote:What context of 'rating' are you even referring to?
Thanks Rayfan!RayFan9876 wrote:As far as I know it's rated R, but I can't be arsed to remember or look. Google it yourself, you silly spawn of the Twenty-First Century.
Where do you get all these nicknames?RayFan9876 wrote:I think I've just been praised for explaining the deep inner-workings of a search engine.
Is there anything else you want to know, my earnest child?
From my ass. Would you rather I pull them from somewhere else?schmooky.luke wrote:Where do you get all these nicknames?RayFan9876 wrote:I think I've just been praised for explaining the deep inner-workings of a search engine.
Is there anything else you want to know, my earnest child?
Do you give anybody else these nicknames?RayFan9876 wrote:From my ass. Would you rather I pull them from somewhere else?