Page 20 of 26
Re: cnat registr
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 6:45 pm
by spiraldoor
Why did you bring the pr0oO group to Pirate-Community? Were there spammers here that you had to stop?
Re: cnat registr
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 7:42 pm
by Tobbe
Re: cnat registr
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 8:19 pm
by spiraldoor
Forest City Enterprises?
Re: cnat registr
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 8:38 pm
by Sh@Dow
FCY-JMDK-WLKY wrote:And what're the chances in favour of a) divine creator existing and b) that creator coming in and shaping everything on the planet in 7 days (or 6, really, since he just had a lie-in on Sunday)? They're just as high as the chances of the tooth fairy, easterbunny, flying spaghettimonster, or any number of other mythological creatures creating themselves in the most bizarre ever orgy and us being the result of the smoke emanating from their post-coital cigarette. There's no evidence whatsoever to prove the existence of any of it, but they're still more likely to you than Darwinian evolution? If that's the case I pity you.
I can put it differently. Germ-theory (i.e. the theory that disease is caused by germs, bacteria and viruses) is globally accepted as being correct, right? The evidence to support this theory, on the other hand, is far less substantiated than the evidence proving the theory of evolution. Why, then, does no one but an absolute lunatic question the validity of germ-theory? The theory of evolution has existed for over 150 years, and has been challenged more than any other - if there was evidence out there of any kind in any true scientific field, it would not still be used today.
The bit about your highschool class doesn't prove anything either, unless they had to make a choice between following either a religion class or a scientific class dealing with evolution. All that can be inferred from what you're saying at the moment is that they didn't want to be confronted with religious beliefs against their will, which is their right. It says nothing, however, about why they didn't want to hear about it. Frankly I envy the fact that they had a choice, as I personally got stuck in a catholic highschool and as such didn't have a way out of religion classes.
- God
Re: cnat registr
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 9:35 pm
by Matyuv
Re: cnat registr
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 9:55 pm
by spiraldoor
I don't understand the direction this thread is going in.
Re: cnat registr
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 9:59 pm
by Matyuv
What was it about originally anyway? :/
Re: cnat registr
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:01 pm
by Shawn
Some troll was wondering how to register.
Re: cnat registr
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:02 pm
by Serza5
He didn't know what an e-mail was
Re: cnat registr
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:03 pm
by Mountain Goat
Re: cnat registr
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:04 pm
by Shawn
Love that guy.
Re: cnat registr
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:08 pm
by Mountain Goat
Re: cnat registr
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:14 pm
by El Dango
OH GOD! I know you're joking, but... OH GOD!
Re: cnat registr
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:18 pm
by Mountain Goat
Why - it is so bad?
He should become a mod.
Re: cnat registr
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:23 pm
by El Dango
mostwanted82 wrote:Why - it is so bad?
You called him cute and posted a heart.
Re: cnat registr
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:24 pm
by Mountain Goat
Why not? I thought you know I'm joking. I was just in a jokin'-mode
Re: cnat registr
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:25 pm
by Shawn
I don't think "<3" is supposed to be a heart.
Re: cnat registr
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:27 pm
by El Dango
mostwanted82 wrote:Why not? I thought you know I'm joking. I was just in a jokin'-mode
I know, but still... o__0
Re: cnat registr
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:27 pm
by Serza5
Shawn wrote:I don't think "<3" is supposed to be a heart.
"<3" is supposed to be heart. Although I think it looks more like a double scoop ice cream.
Re: cnat registr
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:56 pm
by Sh@Dow
Shawn wrote:I don't think "<3" is supposed to be a heart.
It is.
God.
